• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国按县划分的与医疗保健可及性相关的死亡率地理可视化

Geographic Visualization of Mortality in the United States as Related to Healthcare Access by County.

作者信息

Widrich Jason, Nation Shelley, Chippada Prithvi, Wiener Eric, Jenkins Eldon, Peters Landan

机构信息

Anesthesiology, College of Medicine - Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, USA.

Industrial Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jan 20;13(1):e12820. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12820.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.12820
PMID:33643729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7885744/
Abstract

This investigation analyzed the impact of place-based inequities on mortality rates in 2014. The team combined mortality data with metrics on health care accessibility, socioeconomic deprivation, and other variables available from publicly available data sets. The investigation team created a centralized database for visualizations that combined mortality data by diagnosis, socioeconomic data, health resource data, and an index of area deprivation. Choropleth maps, scatterplots, and regression analyses were performed to identify the major areas of mortality and how well different measures of the social determinants of health (SDOH) correlate to mortality data. A bivariate color scheme to visually capture both outcomes and SDOH in a choropleth map was shown to be a compact and novel manner to display complex epidemiologic data.

摘要

本调查分析了2014年基于地点的不平等对死亡率的影响。该团队将死亡率数据与医疗保健可及性、社会经济剥夺及其他可从公开数据集中获取的变量指标相结合。调查团队创建了一个用于可视化的集中数据库,该数据库整合了按诊断分类的死亡率数据、社会经济数据、卫生资源数据以及地区剥夺指数。进行了分级统计图、散点图和回归分析,以确定死亡率的主要区域,以及健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的不同衡量指标与死亡率数据的关联程度。在分级统计图中使用双变量配色方案直观呈现结果和SDOH,被证明是一种紧凑且新颖的方式来展示复杂的流行病学数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/feee79bf2e2a/cureus-0013-00000012820-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/2915d1a5c91d/cureus-0013-00000012820-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/e5e4ba0e06a4/cureus-0013-00000012820-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/99063c281561/cureus-0013-00000012820-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/f357325c4d1a/cureus-0013-00000012820-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/4bc3c878c1c0/cureus-0013-00000012820-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/feee79bf2e2a/cureus-0013-00000012820-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/2915d1a5c91d/cureus-0013-00000012820-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/e5e4ba0e06a4/cureus-0013-00000012820-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/99063c281561/cureus-0013-00000012820-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/f357325c4d1a/cureus-0013-00000012820-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/4bc3c878c1c0/cureus-0013-00000012820-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece6/7885744/feee79bf2e2a/cureus-0013-00000012820-i06.jpg

相似文献

1
Geographic Visualization of Mortality in the United States as Related to Healthcare Access by County.美国按县划分的与医疗保健可及性相关的死亡率地理可视化
Cureus. 2021 Jan 20;13(1):e12820. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12820.
2
Understanding individual health-related social needs in the context of area-level social determinants of health: The case for granularity.在地区层面的健康社会决定因素背景下理解个体与健康相关的社会需求:粒度的重要性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 16;8(1):e78. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.519. eCollection 2024.
3
Should We Implement Geographic or Patient-Reported Social Determinants of Health Measures In Cardiovascular Patients.我们应该在心血管病患者中实施基于地理或患者报告的健康社会决定因素的措施吗?
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jan 21;31(1):9-22. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.1.9. eCollection 2021 Winter.
4
Introduction of an Area Deprivation Index Measuring Patient Socioeconomic Status in an Integrated Health System: Implications for Population Health.在综合卫生系统中引入衡量患者社会经济地位的地区剥夺指数:对人群健康的影响
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Aug 11;4(3):1238. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1238. eCollection 2016.
5
The geographic alignment of primary care Health Professional Shortage Areas with markers for social determinants of health.初级保健卫生专业短缺地区与健康决定因素标志物的地理定位。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0231443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231443. eCollection 2020.
6
An evaluation of the index of medical underservice. Results from a rural consumer survey.医疗服务不足指数评估。一项农村消费者调查的结果。
Med Care. 1984 Oct;22(10):877-89. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198410000-00001.
7
Area deprivation and attachment to a general practitioner through centralized waiting lists: a cross-sectional study in Quebec, Canada.地区剥夺和通过集中式候诊名单与全科医生的联系:加拿大魁北克的一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 4;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0887-9.
8
The health status of southern children: a neglected regional disparity.南方儿童的健康状况:一个被忽视的地区差异。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e746-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0366. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
9
Trends in Health Disparities, Health Inequity, and Social Determinants of Health Research: A 17-Year Analysis of NINR, NCI, NHLBI, and NIMHD Funding.健康差异、健康不平等及健康研究的社会决定因素趋势:对美国国立护理研究院、国立癌症研究所、国立心肺血液研究所及国立少数族裔健康与健康不平等研究所17年资助情况的分析
Nurs Res. 2018 May/Jun;67(3):231-241. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000278.
10
Social Determinants of Health and Adolescent Pregnancy: An Analysis From the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health.健康的社会决定因素与青少年怀孕:来自青少年到成人健康全国纵向研究的分析
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jun;58(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) older adults: Impact of socioeconomic disadvantage on inpatient hospitalizations.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿及其他性取向和性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)老年人健康的社会决定因素:社会经济劣势对住院治疗的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0330612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330612. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: Final Data for 2017.死亡:2017年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(9):1-77.
2
Estimating County-Level Mortality Rates Using Highly Censored Data From CDC WONDER.利用疾控中心 WONDER 高度删失数据估计县死亡率。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 13;16:E76. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180441.
3
Association of Primary Care Physician Supply With Population Mortality in the United States, 2005-2015.2005-2015 年美国初级保健医生供给与人口死亡率的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):506-514. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7624.
4
Growth and Persistence of Place-Based Mortality in the United States: The Rural Mortality Penalty.美国基于地点的死亡率的增长和持续存在:农村死亡率惩罚。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):155-162. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304787. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
5
Development of a spatially complete floodplain map of the conterminous United States using random forest.利用随机森林制作美国本土全流域泛滥平原地图
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:942-953. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.353. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
6
Population characteristics and geographic coverage of primary care facilities.基层医疗设施的人口特征与地理覆盖范围
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3221-8.
7
Multiple Imputation by Fully Conditional Specification for Dealing with Missing Data in a Large Epidemiologic Study.在大型流行病学研究中采用全条件设定多重填补法处理缺失数据
Int J Stat Med Res. 2015;4(3):287-295. doi: 10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.03.7. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
8
Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories.健康不平等:定义、概念与理论
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jun 24;8:27106. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.27106. eCollection 2015.
9
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.社区社会经济劣势与30天再入院率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):765-74. doi: 10.7326/M13-2946.
10
Using GIS and perceived distance to understand the unequal geographies of healthcare in lower-income urban neighbourhoods.利用 GIS 和感知距离了解低收入城市社区医疗保健的不平等地理分布。
Geogr J. 2012;178(1):18-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00411.x.