Li Lingyao, Ma Zihui, Lee Hyesoo, Lee Sanggyu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Apr 1;56:102142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102142. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
The U.S. has taken multiple measures to contain the spread of COVID-19, including the implementation of lockdown orders and social distancing practices. Evaluating social distancing is critical since it reflects the risk of close human interactions. While questionnaire surveys or mobility data-based systems have provided valuable insights, social media data can contribute as an additional instrument to help monitor the risk of human interactions during the pandemic. For this reason, this study introduced a social media-based approach that quantifies the pro/anti-lockdown ratio as an indicator of the risk of human interactions. With the aid of natural language processing and machine learning techniques, this study classified the lockdown-related tweets and quantified the pro/anti-lockdown ratio for each state over time. The anti-lockdown ratio showed a moderate and negative correlation with the state-level social distancing index on a weekly basis, suggesting that people are more likely to travel out of the state where the higher anti-lockdown level is observed. The study further showed that the perception expressed on social media could reflect people's behaviors. The findings of the study are of significance for government agencies to assess the risk of close human interactions and to evaluate their policy effectiveness in the context of social distancing and lockdown.
美国已采取多项措施遏制新冠病毒的传播,包括实施封锁令和保持社交距离措施。评估社交距离至关重要,因为它反映了密切人际互动的风险。虽然问卷调查或基于移动数据的系统提供了有价值的见解,但社交媒体数据可作为一种额外工具,有助于在疫情期间监测人际互动风险。因此,本研究引入了一种基于社交媒体的方法,将支持/反对封锁的比率量化为人际互动风险的指标。借助自然语言处理和机器学习技术,本研究对与封锁相关的推文进行了分类,并随时间推移对每个州的支持/反对封锁比率进行了量化。每周,反对封锁比率与州级社交距离指数呈中度负相关,这表明在反对封锁程度较高的州,人们更有可能离开该州出行。该研究进一步表明,社交媒体上表达的看法能够反映人们的行为。该研究结果对于政府机构评估密切人际互动风险以及在社交距离和封锁背景下评估其政策有效性具有重要意义。