Kelleni Mina T
Pharmacology Department, College of Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.
SN Compr Clin Med. 2021;3(4):919-923. doi: 10.1007/s42399-021-00824-4. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
In this manuscript, we discuss the expectations versus the real-world results of four repurposed COVID-19 drugs: tocilizumab, remdesivir, favipiravir, and dexamethasone from a clinical and pharmacovigilant point of view. We suggest that though the results of two-phase III double-blind clinical trials have been less than expected, tocilizumab has a real remaining potential to treat selected critical cases of COVID-19 beyond clinical trials until more data are revealed. On the contrary, remdesivir, though its FDA approval, and favipiravir are least likely to benefit COVID-19 patients. Moreover, we recommend that the RECOVERY dexamethasone should only be considered for critical hospitalized COVID-19 patients and we urge physicians in developing countries to avoid using it in mild-moderate COVID-19 cases. Finally, we recommend considering a personalized risk-benefit ratio before a decision is made using any of these drugs.
在本手稿中,我们从临床和药物警戒的角度讨论了四种重新用于治疗COVID-19的药物:托珠单抗、瑞德西韦、法匹拉韦和地塞米松的预期效果与实际疗效。我们认为,尽管两项III期双盲临床试验的结果不尽如人意,但在有更多数据公布之前,托珠单抗在临床试验之外仍有实际潜力治疗部分选定的COVID-19重症病例。相反,瑞德西韦尽管已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,以及法匹拉韦,对COVID-19患者受益可能性最小。此外,我们建议,“康复”试验中的地塞米松仅应考虑用于COVID-19住院重症患者,我们敦促发展中国家的医生避免在COVID-19轻症至中症病例中使用该药。最后,我们建议在使用这些药物中的任何一种之前做出决定时,应考虑个性化的风险效益比。