Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Brain Behav. 2021 May;11(5):e02090. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2090. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Circadian rhythms shift toward an evening preference during adolescence, a developmental period marked by greater focus on the social domain and salience of social hierarchies. The circadian system influences maturation of cognitive architecture responsible for motivation and reward, and observation of responses to reward cues has provided insights into neurocognitive processes that underpin adolescent social development. The objective was to investigate whether circadian phase of entrainment (chronotype) predicted both reward-related response inhibition and social status, and to explore whether mediator and moderator relationships existed between chronotype, reward processing, and social status outcomes.
Participants were 75 adolescents aged 13-14 years old (41 females) who completed an eye tracking paradigm that involved an inhibitory control task (antisaccade task) within a nonsocial reward (Card Guessing Game) and a social reward (Cyberball Game) context. Chronotype was calculated from weekend midsleep and grouped into early, intermediate, and later terciles. Participants indicated subjective social status compared with peers in seven domains.
An intermediate and later chronotype predicted improved inhibitory control in the social versus nonsocial reward context. Chronotype also predicted higher perceived social status in two domains (powerful, troublemaker). Intermediate chronotypes reported higher "Powerful" status whereas later chronotypes were higher on "Troublemaker." Improved social reward-related performance predicted only the higher powerful scores and chronotype moderated this relationship. Improved inhibitory control to social reward predicted higher subjective social status in the intermediate and later chronotype group, an effect that was absent in the early group.
This behavioral study found evidence that changes toward a later phase of entrainment predicts social facilitation effects on inhibitory control and higher perceived power among peers. It is proposed here that circadian delayed phase in adolescence is linked to approach-related motivation, and the social facilitation effects could reflect a social cognitive capacity involved in the drive to achieve social rank.
青春期期间,昼夜节律向傍晚偏好转变,这是一个以更加关注社交领域和社会等级制度为特征的发展阶段。昼夜节律系统影响负责动机和奖励的认知结构的成熟,观察对奖励线索的反应为理解支撑青少年社交发展的神经认知过程提供了线索。本研究旨在调查昼夜节律相位(睡眠类型)是否可以预测奖励相关的反应抑制和社会地位,以及是否存在睡眠类型、奖励处理和社会地位结果之间的中介和调节关系。
参与者为 75 名年龄在 13-14 岁(41 名女性)的青少年,他们完成了一个眼动追踪范式,该范式包括一个抑制控制任务(反扫视任务),在非社交奖励(猜牌游戏)和社交奖励(Cyberball 游戏)环境中进行。睡眠类型是根据周末的平均入睡时间计算的,并分为早期、中期和晚期三组。参与者在七个领域与同龄人比较主观社会地位。
中间和晚期的睡眠类型预测了在社交与非社交奖励环境中更好的抑制控制。睡眠类型还预测了两个领域(有权力、麻烦制造者)的更高感知社会地位。中间型睡眠类型报告了更高的“有权力”地位,而晚期型睡眠类型则在“麻烦制造者”方面得分更高。改善的社会奖励相关表现仅预测了更高的有权力得分,而睡眠类型调节了这种关系。改善的对社会奖励的抑制控制预测了中间和晚期睡眠类型组的更高主观社会地位,而在早期睡眠类型组中则没有这种关系。
这项行为研究提供了证据表明,向更晚的相位转变预示着社交促进对抑制控制的影响,以及在同龄人中更高的感知权力。这里提出的是,青春期的昼夜节律延迟与接近相关的动机有关,而社交促进效应可能反映了参与实现社会等级的社会认知能力。