Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Indoor Air. 2021 Jul;31(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/ina.12791. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Material extrusion (ME) desktop 3D printing is known to strongly emit nanoparticles (NP), and the need for risk management has been recognized widely. Four different engineering control measures were studied in real-life office conditions by means of online NP measurements and indoor aerosol modeling. The studied engineering control measures were general ventilation, local exhaust ventilation (LEV), retrofitted enclosure, and retrofitted enclosure with LEV. Efficiency between different control measures was compared based on particle number and surface area (SA) concentrations from which SA concentration was found to be more reliable. The study found out that for regular or long-time use of ME desktop 3D printers, the general ventilation is not sufficient control measure for NP emissions. Also, the LEV with canopy hood attached above the 3D printer did not control the emission remarkably and successful position of the hood in relation to the nozzle was found challenging. Retrofitted enclosure attached to the LEV reduced the NP emissions 96% based on SA concentration. Retrofitted enclosure is nearly as efficient as enclosure attached to the LEV (reduction of 89% based on SA concentration) but may be considered more practical solution than enclosure with LEV.
材料挤出(ME)桌面 3D 打印技术会大量排放纳米颗粒(NP),因此人们广泛认识到需要对其进行风险管理。本研究在实际办公环境中通过在线 NP 测量和室内气溶胶建模的方式,对四种不同的工程控制措施进行了研究。所研究的工程控制措施包括一般通风、局部排气通风(LEV)、改造外壳和带 LEV 的改造外壳。基于粒子数量和表面积(SA)浓度对不同控制措施的效率进行了比较,发现 SA 浓度更可靠。研究结果表明,对于 ME 桌面 3D 打印机的常规或长时间使用,一般通风不是控制 NP 排放的有效措施。此外,在 3D 打印机上方附加集气罩的 LEV 也不能显著控制排放,并且发现集气罩相对于喷嘴的成功位置具有挑战性。附加在 LEV 上的改造外壳可将 NP 排放量减少 96%(基于 SA 浓度)。改造外壳的效率几乎与附加 LEV 的外壳相同(基于 SA 浓度减少 89%),但与带 LEV 的外壳相比,它可能被认为是更实用的解决方案。