Stefaniak Aleksandr B, Bowers Lauren N, Cottrell Gabe, Erdem Ergin, Knepp Alycia K, Martin Stephen, Pretty Jack, Duling Matthew G, Arnold Elizabeth D, Wilson Zachary, Krider Benjamin, LeBouf Ryan F, Virji M Abbas, Sirinterlikci Arif
Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.
School of Engineering, Mathematics, and Science, Robert Morris University, Moon Township, Pennsylvania 15108, United States.
J Chem Health Saf. 2021 Aug 31;28(6):444-456. doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.1c00041.
Material extrusion-type fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3-D printing is a valuable tool for education. During FFF 3-D printing, thermal degradation of the polymer releases small particles and chemicals, many of which are hazardous to human health. In this study, particle and chemical emissions from 10 different filaments made from virgin (never printed) and recycled polymers were used to print the same object at the polymer manufacturer's recommended nozzle temperature ("normal") and at a temperature higher than recommended ("hot") to simulate the real-world scenarios of a person intentionally or unknowingly printing on a machine with a changed setting. Emissions were evaluated in a college teaching laboratory using standard sampling and analytical methods. From mobility sizer measurements, particle number-based emission rates were 81 times higher; the proportion of ultrafine particles (diameter <100 nm) were 4% higher, and median particle sizes were a factor of 2 smaller for hot-temperature prints compared with normal-temperature prints (all -values <0.05). There was no difference in emission characteristics between recycled and virgin acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid polymer filaments. Reducing contaminant release from FFF 3-D printers in educational settings can be achieved using the hierarchy of controls: (1) elimination/substitution (e.g., training students on principles of prevention-through-design, limiting the use of higher emitting polymer when possible); (2) engineering controls (e.g., using local exhaust ventilation to directly remove contaminants at the printer or isolating the printer from students); (3) administrative controls such as password protecting printer settings and establishing and enforcing adherence to a standard operating procedure based on a proper risk assessment for the setup and use (e.g., limiting the use of temperatures higher than those specified for the filaments used); and (4) maintenance of printers.
材料挤出式熔丝制造(FFF)3D打印是一种很有价值的教育工具。在FFF 3D打印过程中,聚合物的热降解会释放出小颗粒和化学物质,其中许多对人体健康有害。在本研究中,使用由原始(从未打印过)和回收聚合物制成的10种不同细丝的颗粒和化学物质排放,在聚合物制造商推荐的喷嘴温度(“正常”)和高于推荐温度(“高温”)下打印同一物体,以模拟人们有意或无意在设置改变的机器上打印的实际场景。在大学教学实验室中使用标准采样和分析方法对排放进行评估。根据迁移率粒度仪测量结果,基于颗粒数量的排放率高出81倍;超细微颗粒(直径<100nm)的比例高出4%,与常温打印相比,高温打印的中位粒径小2倍(所有p值<0.05)。回收的和原始的丙烯腈丁二烯苯乙烯及聚乳酸聚合物细丝的排放特性没有差异。在教育环境中,可通过以下控制层级减少FFF 3D打印机的污染物释放:(1)消除/替代(例如,对学生进行预防设计原则培训,尽可能限制使用排放较高的聚合物);(2)工程控制(例如,使用局部排气通风直接去除打印机处的污染物或使打印机与学生隔离);(3)行政控制,如对打印机设置进行密码保护,并根据对设置和使用的适当风险评估制定和执行对标准操作程序的遵守情况(例如,限制使用高于所用细丝规定温度的温度);以及(4)打印机维护。