Cardno ChemRisk, San Francisco, California, USA.
Cardno ChemRisk, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 Oct;17(10):464-479. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1798012. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
In this pilot-scale study, a wide range of potential emissions were evaluated for four types of additive manufacturing (AM) machines. These included material extrusion (using acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene [ABS]); material jetting (using liquid photopolymer); powder bed fusion (using nylon); and vat photopolymerization (using liquid photopolymer) in an industrial laboratory setting. During isolated operation of AM machines, adjacent area samples were collected for compounds of potential concern (COPCs), including total and individual volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nano- and micron-sized particulate matter, and inorganic gases. A total of 61 compounds were also sampled using a canister followed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis. Most COPCs were not detected or were measured at concentrations far below relevant occupational exposure limits (OELs) during AM machine operations. Submicron particles, predominantly nanoparticles, were produced during material extrusion printing using ABS at approximately 12,000 particles per cubic centimeter (p cm) above background. After subtracting the mean background concentration, the mean concentration for material extrusion printing operations correlated with a calculated emission rate of 2.8 × 10 p min under the conditions tested. During processing of parts produced using material jetting or powder bed fusion, emissions were generally negligible, although concentrations above background of respirable and total dust were measured during processing of powder bed fusion parts. Results of this pilot-scale study indicate that airborne emissions associated with AM operations are variable, depending on printing and parts handling processes, raw materials, and ventilation characteristics. Although personal samples were not collected in this pilot-scale study, the results can be used to inform future exposure assessments. Based on the results of this evaluation, measurement of submicron particles emitted during material extrusion printing operations and dust associated with handling parts manufactured using powder bed fusion processes should be included in exposure assessments.
在这项初步研究中,我们评估了四种增材制造(AM)机器的各种潜在排放。这些机器包括材料挤出(使用丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯 [ABS]);材料喷射(使用液态光聚合物);粉末床熔合(使用尼龙);以及在工业实验室环境中使用光聚合(使用液态光聚合物)。在 AM 机器的单独运行期间,收集了相邻区域的样品,用于潜在关注化合物(COPC),包括总挥发性有机化合物(VOC)和个体挥发性有机化合物、纳米和微米级颗粒物以及无机气体。还使用罐采集了总共 61 种化合物,然后进行气相色谱和质谱分析。在 AM 机器运行过程中,大多数 COPC 未被检测到或浓度远低于相关职业接触限值(OEL)。在使用 ABS 进行材料挤出打印时,会产生亚微米颗粒,主要是纳米颗粒,其浓度约为背景值上方每立方厘米 12,000 个颗粒(p cm)。减去平均背景浓度后,材料挤出打印操作的平均浓度与在测试条件下计算出的 2.8×10 p min 的排放率相关。在使用材料喷射或粉末床熔合制造零件的过程中,排放通常可以忽略不计,尽管在处理粉末床熔合零件时测量到了背景以上的可吸入粉尘和总粉尘浓度。这项初步研究的结果表明,与 AM 操作相关的空气传播排放是可变的,这取决于打印和零件处理过程、原材料和通风特性。尽管在这项初步研究中未收集个人样本,但这些结果可用于为未来的暴露评估提供信息。基于此评估的结果,应在暴露评估中包括材料挤出打印操作中排放的亚微米颗粒和与处理使用粉末床熔合工艺制造的零件相关的粉尘的测量。