Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):892-904. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01062-3. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Universities contribute to economic growth and national competitiveness by equipping students with higher-order thinking and academic skills. Despite large investments in university science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, little is known about how the skills of STEM undergraduates compare across countries and by institutional selectivity. Here, we provide direct evidence on these issues by collecting and analysing longitudinal data on tens of thousands of computer science and electrical engineering students in China, India, Russia and the United States. We find stark differences in skill levels and gains among countries and by institutional selectivity. Compared with the United States, students in China, India and Russia do not gain critical thinking skills over four years. Furthermore, while students in India and Russia gain academic skills during the first two years, students in China do not. These gaps in skill levels and gains provide insights into the global competitiveness of STEM university students across nations and institutional types.
大学通过培养学生的高阶思维和学术技能为经济增长和国家竞争力做出贡献。尽管在大学科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育方面投入了大量资金,但对于 STEM 本科生的技能如何在各国和不同机构的选择性之间进行比较,人们知之甚少。在这里,我们通过收集和分析来自中国、印度、俄罗斯和美国数万名计算机科学和电气工程专业学生的纵向数据,为这些问题提供了直接的证据。我们发现各国之间以及不同机构选择性之间的技能水平和收益存在明显差异。与美国相比,中国、印度和俄罗斯的学生在四年内没有获得批判性思维技能。此外,尽管印度和俄罗斯的学生在前两年获得了学术技能,但中国的学生却没有。这些技能水平和收益方面的差距为我们提供了一个了解各国和不同类型机构的 STEM 大学生全球竞争力的视角。