• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贲门失弛缓症的手术治疗:食管肌层切开术和贝尔西修复术的效果

Surgical treatment of achalasia: results with esophagomyotomy and Belsey repair.

作者信息

Little A G, Soriano A, Ferguson M K, Winans C S, Skinner D B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 May;45(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64520-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64520-1
PMID:3365039
Abstract

To address the controversy regarding the choice of operation for achalasia, the cases of 57 patients having operation, 38 for the first time (Group 1) and 19 with a previous procedure (Group 2), were reviewed. Surgical emphasis was on hiatal dissection to maximize exposure and use of the Belsey fundoplication to achieve cardiac competence without obstruction. Operative mortality was 1 (1.8%) of 57 patients. In group 1, 21 of the 38 had prior pneumatic dilations. All were treated with esophagomyotomy and a Belsey fundoplication. Clinical results are excellent or good in 30 (88%) of the 34 patients for whom follow-up is available, and are similar in patients with and without prior dilation. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure decreased from 22.3 to 7.7 mm Hg (p less than 0.001), and pH testing shows no reflux in any of 13 patients. In Group 2, previous operations were esophagomyotomy in 13, esophagomyotomy plus a Nissen fundoplication in 3, and a Nissen fundoplication only in 3. The initial operation failed because of inadequate myotomy in 6 patients, an obstructive Nissen fundoplication in 6, and reflux esophagitis in 7. In these 7 patients, acid reflux testing documented reflux due to cardiac incompetence and delayed clearance. Reoperations included takedown of a Nissen fundoplication in 6, esophagomyotomy and Belsey procedure in 15, Belsey procedure in 1, and resection plus colon interposition in 2. Clinical results are excellent or good in 12 (75%) of the patients with follow-up. These conclusions can be drawn. (1) Esophagomyotomy and Belsey fundoplication lowers LES pressure and provides good results with low risk, even after pneumatic dilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为解决贲门失弛缓症手术方式选择上的争议,我们回顾了57例接受手术的患者病例,其中38例为首次手术(第1组),19例曾接受过手术(第2组)。手术重点在于食管裂孔解剖以最大化暴露,并采用贝尔西胃底折叠术来实现贲门功能正常且无梗阻。57例患者的手术死亡率为1例(1.8%)。在第1组中,38例患者中有21例曾接受过气囊扩张。所有患者均接受了食管肌层切开术和贝尔西胃底折叠术。在有随访资料的34例患者中,30例(88%)的临床结果为优或良,有或无先前扩张的患者结果相似。食管下括约肌(LES)压力从22.3毫米汞柱降至7.7毫米汞柱(p<0.001),pH测试显示13例患者中无一例有反流。在第2组中,先前的手术包括13例食管肌层切开术、3例食管肌层切开术加nissen胃底折叠术、3例仅行nissen胃底折叠术。6例患者因肌层切开不充分导致初次手术失败,6例因nissen胃底折叠术梗阻,7例因反流性食管炎。在这7例患者中,酸反流测试证实反流是由于贲门功能不全和清除延迟所致。再次手术包括6例拆除nissen胃底折叠术、15例食管肌层切开术和贝尔西手术、1例贝尔西手术、2例切除加结肠间置术。在有随访的患者中,12例(75%)的临床结果为优或良。可得出以下结论。(1)食管肌层切开术和贝尔西胃底折叠术可降低LES压力,即使在气囊扩张后也能以低风险取得良好效果。(摘要截短至250字)

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment of achalasia: results with esophagomyotomy and Belsey repair.贲门失弛缓症的手术治疗:食管肌层切开术和贝尔西修复术的效果
Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 May;45(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64520-1.
2
Objective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux after short esophagomyotomy for achalasia with the use of manometry and pH monitoring.使用测压法和pH监测对贲门失弛缓症短食管肌切开术后胃食管反流进行客观评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Jan;111(1):107-12; discussion 112-3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70406-3.
3
Long-term result of total versus partial fundoplication after esophagomyotomy for primary esophageal motor disorders.原发性食管运动障碍行食管肌层切开术后全胃底折叠术与部分胃底折叠术的长期结果
World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9385-8.
4
Comparison of thoracoscopic and laproscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication for primary motility disorders.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Sep;16 Suppl 1:S34-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00181-5.
5
Efficacy of the transthoracic modified Heller myotomy in children with achalasia--a 21-year experience.经胸改良Heller肌切开术治疗儿童贲门失弛缓症的疗效——21年经验总结
J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Feb;32(2):338-41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90206-2.
6
A prospective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux before and after treatment of achalasia patients: pneumatic dilation versus transthoracic limited myotomy.贲门失弛缓症患者治疗前后胃食管反流的前瞻性评估:气囊扩张术与经胸局限性肌切开术对比
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jul;92(7):1109-12.
7
Treatment of achalasia: esophagomyotomy with antireflux procedure.
Can J Surg. 1980 Nov;23(6):588-9.
8
Transthoracic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: analysis of long-term results.经胸Heller肌切开术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症:长期结果分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;81(6):2044-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.039.
9
Intraoperative esophageal manometry: our experience.术中食管测压:我们的经验。
Dis Esophagus. 1997 Oct;10(4):253-61. doi: 10.1093/dote/10.4.253.
10
Prospective evaluation of 24 hour ambulatory pH metry in Belsey Mark IV antireflux surgery.贝尔西Mark IV抗反流手术中24小时动态pH测量的前瞻性评估
Gut. 1994 Nov;35(11):1529-35. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.11.1529.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical treatment of achalasia in children: is an added antireflux procedure necessary?
Pediatr Surg Int. 1996 Mar;11(2-3):134-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00183745. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
2
Long-term result of total versus partial fundoplication after esophagomyotomy for primary esophageal motor disorders.原发性食管运动障碍行食管肌层切开术后全胃底折叠术与部分胃底折叠术的长期结果
World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9385-8.
3
Very late results of esophagomyotomy for patients with achalasia: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and acid reflux studies in 67 patients for a mean follow-up of 190 months.贲门失弛缓症患者行食管肌层切开术的远期结果:67例患者的临床、内镜、组织学、测压及酸反流研究,平均随访190个月。
Ann Surg. 2006 Feb;243(2):196-203. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197469.12632.e0.
4
Objective analysis of gastroesophageal reflux after laparoscopic heller myotomy: an anti-reflux procedure is required.腹腔镜Heller肌切开术后胃食管反流的客观分析:需要一种抗反流手术。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8932-8. Epub 2004 Nov 11.
5
The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症治疗策略的成本效益
Dig Dis Sci. 2002 Jul;47(7):1516-25. doi: 10.1023/a:1015811001267.
6
Efficacy and safety of cardiomyotomy in patients with achalasia after failure of pneumatic dilatation.气囊扩张失败后贲门失弛缓症患者行贲门肌层切开术的疗效与安全性。
Dig Dis Sci. 1999 Nov;44(11):2277-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1026613005846.
7
Surgery for achalasia: 1998.贲门失弛缓症的手术治疗:1998年。
J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Sep-Oct;3(5):447-55. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80096-1.
8
Comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.胸腔镜与腹腔镜下贲门失弛缓症Heller肌切开术的比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Nov-Dec;2(6):561-6. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80057-7.
9
Achalasia: the usefulness of manometry for evaluation of treatment.贲门失弛缓症:食管测压在评估治疗效果中的作用
Dig Dis Sci. 1999 Mar;44(3):536-41. doi: 10.1023/a:1026601322665.
10
Effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia.气囊扩张术对贲门失弛缓症患者胃食管反流的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 May;42(5):998-1002. doi: 10.1023/a:1018884919125.