Suppr超能文献

原发性食管运动障碍行食管肌层切开术后全胃底折叠术与部分胃底折叠术的长期结果

Long-term result of total versus partial fundoplication after esophagomyotomy for primary esophageal motor disorders.

作者信息

Zhu Zi-Jiang, Chen Long-Qi, Duranceau Andre

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9385-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selection of the type of fundoplication or the necessity for an added fundoplication after esophagomyotomy (Heller's operation) for the treatment of achalasia remains controversial. The present retrospective study was designed to compare the long-term results of total and partial fundoplication on the myotomized esophagus.

METHODS

Between 1978 and 1998, a total of 64 consecutive patients with achalasia or diffuse esophageal spasm underwent esophagomyotomy and an antireflux operation via a left thoracotomy approach. Twenty-one had a total fundoplication (Nissen Group) during the period 1978-1983. After 1984 and until 1998, the remaining 43 patients were treated with addition of a Belsey Mark IV partial fundoplication (Belsey Group) to protect the myotomized esophagus. Clinical, radiologic, radionuclide transit, manometric, 24-h pH monitoring, and endoscopic assessments were obtained before and after the operation.

RESULTS

There were no operative deaths or major complications in either group. After 6 years of follow-up the Belsey group was compared to the Nissen group. A higher frequency of dysphagia (7/18 versus 3/31; p=0.025), more barium stasis (9/13 versus 10/27; p=0.056), and increased radionuclide material retention (52.4% versus 29.2%; p=0.044) were observed in the Nissen group. These findings were confirmed by endoscopy, which showed increased esophageal lumen dilation (10/15 versus 8/26; p=0.026) and more frequent food retention (11/15 versus 6/26; p=0.002). Functionally, both operations successfully reduced the lower esophageal sphincter pressure gradient (from 23.8 to 7.7 mmHg for the Nissen group, and from 27.4 to 8.2 mmHg for the Belsey group; p=0.656). In the Nissen group, the esophageal diameter observed on radiology increased from 3.9 cm preoperatively to 5.5 cm postoperatively (p=0.012), whereas it remained identical for the Belsey group (ranging from 5.4 cm to 5.3 cm; p=0.695). Reoperation to relieve recurrent dysphagia and esophageal retention was necessary in 8 patients from the Nissen group and in 1 patient from the Belsey group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When treating achalasia or diffuse esophageal spasm by esophageal myotomy and an antireflux operation, a total fundoplication adds too much resistance to allow esophageal emptying and is considered as inappropriate. A partial fundoplication provides proper antireflux effects without causing significant esophageal emptying difficulties.

摘要

背景

对于贲门失弛缓症的治疗,在食管肌层切开术(赫勒手术)后选择胃底折叠术的类型或是否有必要附加胃底折叠术仍存在争议。本回顾性研究旨在比较完全胃底折叠术和部分胃底折叠术对切开肌层的食管的长期效果。

方法

1978年至1998年间,共有64例连续的贲门失弛缓症或弥漫性食管痉挛患者通过左胸切口进行了食管肌层切开术和抗反流手术。1978年至1983年期间,21例患者接受了完全胃底折叠术(nissen组)。1984年之后至1998年,其余43例患者接受了附加Belsey Mark IV部分胃底折叠术(Belsey组)以保护切开肌层的食管。在手术前后进行了临床、放射学、放射性核素通过时间、测压、24小时pH监测和内镜评估。

结果

两组均无手术死亡或严重并发症。随访6年后,将Belsey组与nissen组进行比较。nissen组吞咽困难发生率更高(7/18对3/31;p=0.025),钡剂潴留更多(9/13对10/27;p=0.056),放射性核素物质潴留增加(52.4%对29.2%;p=0.044)。内镜检查证实了这些发现,内镜检查显示食管腔扩张增加(10/15对8/26;p=0.026)和食物潴留更频繁(11/15对6/26;p=0.002)。在功能上,两种手术均成功降低了食管下括约肌压力梯度(nissen组从23.8降至7.7 mmHg,Belsey组从27.4降至8.2 mmHg;p=0.656)。在nissen组,放射学观察到的食管直径从术前的3.9 cm增加到术后的5.5 cm(p=0.012),而Belsey组则保持不变(范围从5.4 cm到5.3 cm;p=0.695)。nissen组有8例患者和Belsey组有1例患者因复发性吞咽困难和食管潴留而需要再次手术(p<0.001)。

结论

在通过食管肌层切开术和抗反流手术治疗贲门失弛缓症或弥漫性食管痉挛时,完全胃底折叠术增加了过多阻力,导致食管排空不畅,被认为不合适。部分胃底折叠术可提供适当的抗反流效果,而不会引起明显的食管排空困难。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验