Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Grecia", Catanzaro, Italy -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Apr;57(2):273-279. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06581-3. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
People affected by osteoporosis and fragility fractures often report disability and poor health-related quality of life. Albeit rehabilitation has a crucial role in older people, post-menopausal women and other subjects with high risk of fragility fractures, the rehabilitation perspective has been poorly investigated in the available guidelines for osteoporosis. The aim of this systematic review was to systematically evaluate the quality of guidelines for osteoporosis from a rehabilitation perspective.
On May 2020, we performed a systematic search on medical literature of all guidelines published in the last 10 years on PubMed, Pedro, and international guideline databases. The study selection was based on key terms "exercise," "physical activity" or "rehabilitation." All authors independently assessed the methodological quality through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, consisting of six domains (scope, stakeholder involvement, rigor and development, clarity of presentation, applicability, editorial independence).
Out of 331 documents retrieved, a total of 34 guidelines were selected after the screening phases. Twenty (58.8%) high quality guidelines were reported. According to AGREE II instrument, a mean score of 78.1±21.8% was reported for "scope and purpose" domain; for stakeholder involvement, the mean score was 58.1±22.1%; the rigor of development was good (mean score of 61.3±27.3%); for clarity of presentation the mean score was 79.4±20.3%; the applicability was poor (mean score of 30.9±25.2%); for editorial independence the mean score was 75.1±24.6%. Rehabilitation recommendations for osteoporotic patients were reported in 21 (61.8%) of the selected guidelines.
This is the first systematic analysis evaluating quality of the guidelines for osteoporosis using AGREE II instrument. Starting from a state of the art of the currently available evidence, we could conclude that therapeutic exercise at moderate to high intensity is encouraged by several guidelines for the management of people with osteoporosis and fragility fractures. More than half of guidelines were of high-quality. However, most guidelines are lacking specific indications about exercise features. This study might support the implementation of a rehabilitation perspective in the guidelines for osteoporotic patients.
患有骨质疏松症和脆性骨折的人通常会出现残疾和健康相关生活质量下降。尽管康复对于老年人、绝经后妇女和其他高脆性骨折风险人群至关重要,但在现有的骨质疏松症指南中,康复视角的研究甚少。本系统评价旨在从康复角度系统评估骨质疏松症指南的质量。
2020 年 5 月,我们在 PubMed、Pedro 和国际指南数据库中对过去 10 年发表的所有指南进行了系统检索,检索词为“exercise”“physical activity”或“rehabilitation”。所有作者均通过 Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II 工具独立评估方法学质量,该工具由 6 个领域组成(范围、利益相关者参与、严谨性和开发、表述清晰度、适用性、编辑独立性)。
在 331 篇文献中,经过筛选后共选择了 34 篇指南。报告了 20 篇(58.8%)高质量指南。根据 AGREE II 工具,“范围和目的”领域的平均评分为 78.1±21.8%;利益相关者参与的平均评分为 58.1±22.1%;开发的严谨性较好(平均评分为 61.3±27.3%);表述清晰度的平均评分为 79.4±20.3%;适用性较差(平均评分为 30.9±25.2%);编辑独立性的平均评分为 75.1±24.6%。21 篇(61.8%)选定的指南中报告了骨质疏松症患者的康复建议。
这是首次使用 AGREE II 工具系统分析评估骨质疏松症指南的质量。从目前可用证据的现状出发,我们可以得出结论,几项骨质疏松症和脆性骨折患者管理指南鼓励进行中等至高强度的治疗性运动。超过一半的指南为高质量。然而,大多数指南缺乏关于运动特征的具体指示。本研究可能支持在骨质疏松症患者指南中实施康复视角。