Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 26;57(3):200. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030200.
The potential benefits of the scientific insights gleaned from years of treating ME/CFS for the emerging symptoms of COVID-19, and in particular Longhaul- or Longhauler-COVID-19 are discussed in this opinion article. Longhaul COVID-19 is the current name being given to the long-term sequelae (symptoms lasting beyond 6 weeks) of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multiple case definitions for ME/CFS exist, but post-exertional malaise (PEM) is currently emerging as the 'hallmark' symptom. The inability to identify a unique trigger of ME/CFS, as well as the inability to identify a specific, diagnostic laboratory test, led many physicians to conclude that the illness was psychosomatic or non-existent. However, recent research in the US and the UK, championed by patient organizations and their use of the internet and social media, suggest underlying pathophysiologies, e.g., oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. The similarity and overlap of ME/CFS and Longhaul COVID-19 symptoms suggest to us similar pathological processes. We put forward a unifying hypothesis that explains the precipitating events such as viral triggers and other documented exposures: For their overlap in symptoms, ME/CFS and Longhaul COVID-19 should be described as Post Active Phase of Infection Syndromes (PAPIS). We further propose that the underlying biochemical pathways and pathophysiological processes of similar symptoms are similar regardless of the initiating trigger. Exploration of the biochemical pathways and pathophysiological processes should yield effective therapies for these conditions and others that may exhibit these symptoms. ME/CFS patients have suffered far too long. Longhaul COVD-19 patients should not be subject to a similar fate. We caution that failure to meet the now combined challenges of ME/CFS and Longhaul COVID-19 will impose serious socioeconomic as well as clinical consequences for patients, the families of patients, and society as a whole.
本文讨论了从多年治疗 ME/CFS 中获得的科学见解对 COVID-19 新出现症状的潜在益处,特别是对“长新冠”或“长新冠患者”的益处。长新冠是目前用于描述 SARS-CoV-2 感染后持续超过 6 周的长期后遗症(症状)的名称。目前存在多种 ME/CFS 的病例定义,但体力活动后不适(PEM)目前正在成为“标志性”症状。由于无法确定 ME/CFS 的独特触发因素,也无法确定特定的诊断性实验室测试,许多医生得出结论认为这种疾病是心身疾病或不存在的。然而,最近在美国和英国进行的研究,以及患者组织的倡导和他们对互联网和社交媒体的利用,表明存在潜在的病理生理学机制,例如氧化应激和线粒体功能障碍。ME/CFS 和长新冠症状的相似性和重叠表明我们存在相似的病理过程。我们提出了一个统一的假设,解释了类似的诱发事件,如病毒触发因素和其他有记录的暴露:鉴于症状的重叠,ME/CFS 和长新冠应被描述为感染后活跃期综合征(PAPIS)。我们进一步提出,无论起始触发因素如何,相似症状的潜在生化途径和病理生理过程是相似的。探索生化途径和病理生理过程应该能够为这些疾病和其他可能表现出这些症状的疾病提供有效的治疗方法。ME/CFS 患者已经遭受了太久的痛苦。长新冠患者不应该遭受类似的命运。我们警告说,如果不能应对 ME/CFS 和长新冠的共同挑战,将对患者、患者家属和整个社会造成严重的社会经济和临床后果。