• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.美国 1999 年至 2008 年因分心驾驶导致的死亡趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2213-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
2
Demographic characteristics and trends of cell phone use while driving citations in selected states in the United States, 2010-2020.2010-2020 年美国部分州开车时使用手机罚单的人口统计学特征和趋势。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(6):788-794. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2351605. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Distracted Driving Laws and Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities.分心驾驶法规与机动车事故死亡人数
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3621. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
Fatalities of pedestrians, bicycle riders, and motorists due to distracted driving motor vehicle crashes in the U.S., 2005-2010.2005-2010 年美国因分心驾驶机动车事故导致的行人和骑车人、机动车驾驶者死亡人数。
Public Health Rep. 2013 Nov-Dec;128(6):436-42. doi: 10.1177/003335491312800603.
5
Watch for motorcycles! The effects of texting and handheld bans on motorcyclist fatalities.注意摩托车!禁止发短信和手持设备对摩托车手死亡的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Nov;216:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
The role of alcohol use on recent trends in distracted driving.酒精使用在分心驾驶近期趋势中的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.025. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
7
Prevalence and trends of distracted driving in Canada.加拿大分心驾驶的流行趋势和变化。
J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
Bans on Cellphone Use While Driving and Traffic Fatalities in the United States.美国的开车时禁止使用手机和交通死亡人数。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):731-739. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001391.
9
Cell phone use while driving laws and motor vehicle driver fatalities: differences in population subgroups and location.驾驶时使用手机的法律和机动车驾驶员死亡人数:人口亚组和地点的差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Association between mobile phone traffic volume and road crash fatalities: A population-based case-crossover study.手机话务量与道路交通事故死亡人数之间的关联:基于人群的病例交叉研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating medical student's attitudes about road accident risks: A cross-sectional study.调查医学生对道路交通事故风险的态度:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;7(2):e1913. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1913. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
In-Car Environment Control Using an SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface with Visual Stimuli Presented on Head-Up Display: Performance Comparison with a Button-Press Interface.基于 SSVEP 的脑-机接口结合头显呈现的视觉刺激进行车内环境控制:与按键接口的性能比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;24(2):545. doi: 10.3390/s24020545.
3
Surfing in the streets: How problematic smartphone use, fear of missing out, and antisocial personality traits are linked to driving behavior.街头冲浪:智能手机使用问题、错失恐惧和反社会人格特质与驾驶行为有何关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284984. eCollection 2023.
4
Factors affecting road safety compliance in a low- and middle-income country: An observational study from Lebanon.影响低收入和中等收入国家道路安全合规性的因素:来自黎巴嫩的一项观察性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;2(3):e0000154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000154. eCollection 2022.
5
Technology for reducing distracted driving in developing countries: the level of usage and intention to use in Indonesia.发展中国家减少分心驾驶的技术:印度尼西亚的使用水平和使用意愿
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 23;8(11):e11709. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11709. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Review of Research on Road Traffic Operation Risk Prevention and Control.道路交通安全运行风险防控研究述评
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 25;19(19):12115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912115.
7
Acceptance of criteria for health and driver scoring in the general public in Germany.德国普通公众对健康和驾驶评分标准的认可。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250224. eCollection 2021.
8
Driving Safety in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年及青年的驾驶安全
Diabetes Spectr. 2020 Nov;33(4):352-357. doi: 10.2337/ds20-0021.
9
Complementary Deep and Shallow Learning with Boosting for Public Transportation Safety.深度学习与浅层学习互补,并结合提升方法在公共交通安全中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 19;20(17):4671. doi: 10.3390/s20174671.
10
A Review of Data Analytic Applications in Road Traffic Safety. Part 1: Descriptive and Predictive Modeling.道路交通安全数据分析应用综述。第 1 部分:描述性和预测性建模。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;20(4):1107. doi: 10.3390/s20041107.

本文引用的文献

1
Novice drivers' risky driving behavior, risk perception, and crash risk: findings from the DRIVE study.新手驾驶员的危险驾驶行为、风险认知与撞车风险:DRIVE研究的结果
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1638-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150367. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
2
The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving.驾驶时对风险的认知以及接听和拨打手机的重要性所产生的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 May;41(3):438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
3
Presence of passengers: does it increase or reduce driver's crash potential?乘客的存在:它会增加还是降低驾驶员的撞车可能性?
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Sep;40(5):1703-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
4
A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance.关于手机对驾驶员表现影响的荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1282-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
5
The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance.使用MP3播放器练习对驾驶性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):704-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.014. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
6
The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers.驾驶员注意力分散对青少年驾驶员及其乘客受伤严重程度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
7
The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.分心对青少年驾驶员撞车类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
8
Cell phones and driving: review of research.手机与驾驶:研究综述
Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Jun;7(2):89-106. doi: 10.1080/15389580600651103.
9
Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study.手机在导致伤者前往医院就诊的机动车碰撞事故中的作用:一项病例交叉研究。
BMJ. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55. Epub 2005 Jul 12.
10
Driver's exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment.驾驶员在其自然驾驶环境中受到的干扰。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1093-101. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.007. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

美国 1999 年至 2008 年因分心驾驶导致的死亡趋势。

Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2213-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179
PMID:20864709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2951952/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined trends in distracted driving fatalities and their relation to cell phone use and texting volume.

METHODS

The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) records data on all road fatalities that occurred on public roads in the United States from 1999 to 2008. We studied trends in distracted driving fatalities, driver and crash characteristics, and trends in cell phone use and texting volume. We used multivariate regression analysis to estimate the relation between state-level distracted driving fatalities and texting volumes.

RESULTS

After declining from 1999 to 2005, fatalities from distracted driving increased 28% after 2005, rising from 4572 fatalities to 5870 in 2008. Crashes increasingly involved male drivers driving alone in collisions with roadside obstructions in urban areas. By use of multivariate analyses, we predicted that increasing texting volumes resulted in more than 16,000 additional road fatalities from 2001 to 2007.

CONCLUSIONS

Distracted driving is a growing public safety hazard. Specifically, the dramatic rise in texting volume since 2005 appeared to be contributing to an alarming rise in distracted driving fatalities. Legislation enacting texting bans should be paired with effective enforcement to deter drivers from using cell phones while driving.

摘要

目的

我们研究了分心驾驶死亡事故的趋势及其与手机使用和短信发送量的关系。

方法

死亡事故分析报告系统(FARS)记录了 1999 年至 2008 年期间在美国公共道路上发生的所有道路死亡事故的数据。我们研究了分心驾驶死亡事故、驾驶员和碰撞特征的趋势,以及手机使用和短信发送量的趋势。我们使用多元回归分析来估计州级分心驾驶死亡事故与短信发送量之间的关系。

结果

自 1999 年至 2005 年下降后,2005 年后分心驾驶死亡事故增加了 28%,从 2005 年的 4572 起增加到 2008 年的 5870 起。事故越来越多地涉及独自驾驶的男性驾驶员,在城市地区与路边障碍物发生碰撞。通过多元分析,我们预测,2001 年至 2007 年,短信发送量的增加导致了超过 16000 人额外的道路死亡事故。

结论

分心驾驶是一个日益严重的公共安全隐患。具体来说,自 2005 年以来短信发送量的急剧增加似乎导致了分心驾驶死亡事故的惊人上升。应颁布禁止发短信的立法,并配以有效的执行措施,以阻止驾驶员在驾驶时使用手机。