Krutsinger Dustin C, Hetland Breanna D, O'Leary Kelly L, Halpern Scott D, Courtright Katherine R
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, 12284University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
12284University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing, Omaha, NE, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Mar;37(3):430-434. doi: 10.1177/0885066621998978. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
We sought to identify factors that influence surrogate decision makers' decisions to enroll patients into a critical care randomized controlled trial.
We conducted a qualitative study embedded within a randomized controlled trial testing the effect of a behavioral nudge intervention for surrogate decision makers on enrollment rate in a sham ventilatory weaning trial among patients with acute respiratory failure. Participants were adult surrogate decision makers of patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The study was conducted in 10 ICUs across 2 urban hospitals within an academic medical center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvanaia, United States. Immediately following their trial enrollment decision, surrogate decision makers were asked to enter free-text responses about the factors that influenced their decision. Responses were analyzed using content analysis.
Of the 90 (49%) participants who provided free-text responses, the mean age was 54.9 years (SD 14.3), 69 (79%) were Caucasian, and 48 (53%) were the spouse of the eligible patient. We identified 5 themes influencing enrollment decisions: (i) trial characteristics, (ii) patient clinical condition, (iii) decision making processes, (iv) altruism, and (v) enrollment attempt. Among surrogates who enrolled the patient in the trial (n = 40), the most commonly cited factors were helping future patients (n = 24, 60%) and following the patient's wishes (n = 11, 28%). In contrast, those who declined enrollment (n = 50) most commonly reported that the patient was too sick (n = 27, 54%) and that they feared complicating the patient's condition (n = 11, 22%).
Surrogates who enroll patients into trials most often cite altruistic motivations, while those who decline enrollment are most often concerned with the severity of the patients' condition.
我们试图确定影响替代决策者决定让患者参加重症监护随机对照试验的因素。
我们在一项随机对照试验中进行了一项定性研究,该试验测试了针对替代决策者的行为助推干预对急性呼吸衰竭患者假通气撤机试验入选率的影响。参与者是接受急性呼吸衰竭机械通气患者的成年替代决策者。该研究在美国宾夕法尼亚州费城的一个学术医疗中心的2家城市医院的10个重症监护病房进行。在替代决策者做出试验入选决定后,立即要求他们输入关于影响其决定的因素的自由文本回复。使用内容分析法对回复进行分析。
在提供自由文本回复的90名(49%)参与者中,平均年龄为54.9岁(标准差14.3),69名(79%)为白种人,48名(53%)是符合条件患者的配偶。我们确定了影响入选决定的5个主题:(i)试验特征,(ii)患者临床状况,(iii)决策过程,(iv)利他主义,以及(v)入选尝试。在让患者参加试验的替代决策者(n = 40)中,最常提到的因素是帮助未来患者(n = 24,60%)和遵循患者的意愿(n = 11,28%)。相比之下,那些拒绝入选的人(n = 50)最常报告患者病情过重(n = 27,54%)以及他们担心使患者病情复杂化(n = 11,22%)。
让患者参加试验的替代决策者最常提及利他动机,而拒绝入选的替代决策者最常担心患者病情的严重程度。