• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Consent Approach and Patient Notification in Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials in Critical Care.

作者信息

Krutsinger Dustin C, Courtright Katherine R

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; and.

Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jul;22(7):977-978. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-218ED.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-218ED
PMID:40198799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254144/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a50/12254144/4cd0c292df12/AnnalsATS.202502-218EDUf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a50/12254144/4cd0c292df12/AnnalsATS.202502-218EDUf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a50/12254144/4cd0c292df12/AnnalsATS.202502-218EDUf1.jpg

相似文献

1
Consent Approach and Patient Notification in Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials in Critical Care.重症监护实用比较效果试验中的同意方法与患者告知
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jul;22(7):977-978. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-218ED.
2
Eliciting Patient Preferences for Pragmatic Critical Care Trials: A Qualitative Study.探究患者对实用重症监护试验的偏好：一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jul;22(7):1027-1034. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1122OC.
3
Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach.参与实用透析试验的意愿：医生决策自主权和同意方式的重要性。
Trials. 2017 Oct 11;18(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2217-8.
4
Who is willing to participate in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials without consent?谁愿意未经同意就参与低风险的实用型临床试验呢？
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;73(12):1557-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2332-1. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
5
Patients' beliefs regarding informed consent for low-risk pragmatic trials.患者对低风险实用临床试验知情同意的看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0424-3.
6
Telephone communication of HIV testing results for improving knowledge of HIV infection status.通过电话沟通艾滋病毒检测结果以提高对艾滋病毒感染状况的认知。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD009192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009192.pub2.
7
Comparison of Approaches for Notification and Authorization in Pragmatic Clinical Research Evaluating Commonly Used Medical Practices.评估常用医疗实践的实用临床研究中通知与授权方法的比较
Med Care. 2017 Nov;55(11):970-978. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000762.
8
Public preferences on written informed consent for low-risk pragmatic clinical trials in Spain.公众对西班牙低风险实用临床试验书面知情同意书的偏好。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;83(9):1921-1931. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13305. Epub 2017 Jun 11.
9
An Ethically Supported Framework for Determining Patient Notification and Informed Consent Practices When Using Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.在医疗保健中使用人工智能时确定患者通知和知情同意实践的伦理支持框架。
Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):572-578. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 May 22.
10
Alignment between the research question, design, and terminology is required in manual therapy trials: a methodological study.手法治疗试验中需要研究问题、设计和术语之间保持一致：一项方法学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;183:111817. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111817. Epub 2025 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliciting Patient Preferences for Pragmatic Critical Care Trials: A Qualitative Study.探究患者对实用重症监护试验的偏好：一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jul;22(7):1027-1034. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1122OC.
2
Making the Ethical Oversight of All Clinical Trials Fit for Purpose.使所有临床试验的伦理监督符合目的。
JAMA. 2025 Jan 7;333(1):75-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0269.
3
Public perception of participation in low-risk clinical trials in critical care using waived consent: a Canadian national survey.公众对使用豁免同意参与重症监护低风险临床试验的看法：一项加拿大全国性调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jul;71(7):1015-1022. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02723-3. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
The Need for Change in Generating Evidence for the Critically Ill.为重症患者生成证据方面变革的必要性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Dec 1;208(11):1156-1157. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-0997VP.
5
Systematic Review of the "Pragmatism" of Pragmatic Critical Care Trials.实用主义重症监护试验的“实用主义”系统评价
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jul 22;4(7):e0738. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000738. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of enrollment into ARDS and sepsis trials published between 2009 and 2019 in major journals.一项对 2009 年至 2019 年间在主要期刊上发表的 ARDS 和脓毒症试验入组情况的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2021 Nov 15;25(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03804-1.
7
A Qualitative Analysis of Factors Influencing Critical Care Trial Enrollment Among Surrogates.影响代理人参与重症监护试验招募因素的定性分析
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Mar;37(3):430-434. doi: 10.1177/0885066621998978. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
8
The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.实用临床试验设计和实施中引发的伦理挑战：关键利益攸关方的访谈研究。
Trials. 2019 Dec 23;20(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3899-x.
9
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults.重症成年患者中平衡晶体液与生理盐水的比较
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach.参与实用透析试验的意愿：医生决策自主权和同意方式的重要性。
Trials. 2017 Oct 11;18(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2217-8.