Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jul 29;71(709):e604-e613. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0178. Print 2021 Aug.
In England, GPs are independent contractors working to a national contract. Since 2017, the contract requires GPs to use electronic tools to proactively identify moderate and severe frailty in people aged ≥65 years, and offer interventions to help those identified to stay well and maintain independent living. Little is currently known about GPs' views of this contractual requirement.
To explore GPs' views of identifying frailty and offering interventions for those living with moderate or severe frailty.
A sequential mixed-methods study of GPs in the East Midlands region of England - namely Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, and Northamptonshire - undertaken between January and May 2019.
GPs were made aware of the study via professional organisations' newsletters and bulletins, GP email lists, and social media, and were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and, based on those survey responses, GPs with a range of GP and practice characteristics, as well as views on identifying frailty, were selected to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis.
In total, 188 out of 3058 (6.1%) GPs responded to the survey and 18 GPs were interviewed. GPs were broadly supportive of identifying frailty, but felt risk-stratification tools lacked sensitivity and specificity, and wanted evidence showing clinical benefit. Frailty identification increased workload and was under-resourced, with limited time for, and access to, necessary interventions. GPs felt they lacked knowledge about frailty and more education was required to better understand it.
Proactively identifying and responding to frailty in primary care requires GP education, highly sensitive and specific risk-stratification tools, better access to interventions to lessen the impact of frailty, and adequate resourcing to achieve potential clinical impact.
在英国,全科医生是独立承包商,按照国家合同工作。自 2017 年以来,合同要求全科医生使用电子工具主动识别 65 岁及以上人群的中度和重度虚弱,并提供干预措施,帮助那些被识别的人保持健康并维持独立生活。目前,全科医生对这一合同要求的看法知之甚少。
探讨全科医生对识别虚弱和为中度或重度虚弱患者提供干预措施的看法。
2019 年 1 月至 5 月期间,在英格兰东米德兰兹地区(即德比郡、莱斯特郡、林肯郡、诺丁汉郡和北安普敦郡)对全科医生进行了一项顺序混合方法研究。
通过专业组织的通讯和公告、全科医生电子邮件列表和社交媒体向全科医生告知该研究,并邀请他们完成在线问卷调查。使用描述性统计分析对回应进行分析,并根据这些调查回应,选择具有不同全科医生和实践特征以及对识别虚弱的看法的全科医生参加半结构化电话访谈。使用框架分析对访谈记录进行分析。
共有 3058 名全科医生中的 188 名(6.1%)回应了调查,其中 18 名全科医生接受了访谈。全科医生普遍支持识别虚弱,但他们认为风险分层工具缺乏敏感性和特异性,并希望有证据表明其具有临床益处。虚弱识别增加了工作量且资源不足,用于必要干预的时间和途径有限。全科医生认为他们缺乏有关虚弱的知识,需要更多的教育来更好地理解它。
在初级保健中主动识别和应对虚弱需要全科医生教育、高度敏感和特异性的风险分层工具、更好地获得减轻虚弱影响的干预措施以及足够的资源来实现潜在的临床影响。