• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MIA 和 MSKCC 列线图是否有助于选择黑色素瘤患者进行前哨淋巴结活检?

Are the MIA and MSKCC nomograms useful in selecting patients with melanoma for sentinel lymph node biopsy?

机构信息

Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1167-1173. doi: 10.1002/jso.27231. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1002/jso.27231
PMID:36905337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10147582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

The Melanoma Institute of Australia (MIA) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomograms were developed to help guide sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) decisions. Although statistically validated, whether these prediction models provide clinical benefit at National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-endorsed thresholds is unknown. We conducted a net benefit analysis to quantify the clinical utility of these nomograms at risk thresholds of 5%-10% compared to the alternative strategy of biopsying all patients. External validation data for MIA and MSKCC nomograms were extracted from respective published studies.

RESULTS

The MIA nomogram provided added net benefit at a risk threshold of 9% but net harm at 5%-8% and 10%. The MSKCC nomogram provided added net benefit at risk thresholds of 5% and 9%-10% but net harm at 6%-8%. When present, the magnitude of net benefit was small (1-3 net avoidable biopsies per 100 patients).

CONCLUSION

Neither model consistently provided added net benefit compared to performing SLNB for all patients.

DISCUSSION

Based on published data, use of the MIA or MSKCC nomograms as decision-making tools for SLNB at risk thresholds of 5%-10% does not clearly provide clinical benefit to patients.

摘要

背景与方法

澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所(MIA)和纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)的列线图旨在帮助指导前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)决策。尽管经过统计学验证,但这些预测模型在国家综合癌症网络指南认可的阈值下是否提供临床获益尚不清楚。我们进行了净收益分析,以量化在 5%-10%的风险阈值下,这些列线图相对于对所有患者进行活检的替代策略的临床实用性。从各自发表的研究中提取了 MIA 和 MSKCC 列线图的外部验证数据。

结果

MIA 列线图在风险阈值为 9%时提供了额外的净收益,但在 5%-8%和 10%时则带来了净损害。MSKCC 列线图在风险阈值为 5%和 9%-10%时提供了额外的净收益,但在 6%-8%时则带来了净损害。如果存在净收益,则其幅度较小(每 100 例患者中可避免 1-3 例活检)。

结论

与对所有患者进行 SLNB 相比,两种模型均未一致提供额外的净收益。

讨论

根据已发表的数据,在 5%-10%的风险阈值下,使用 MIA 或 MSKCC 列线图作为 SLNB 的决策工具并不能为患者提供明确的临床获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb0/10147582/79b881019b9f/nihms-1882065-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb0/10147582/79b881019b9f/nihms-1882065-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb0/10147582/79b881019b9f/nihms-1882065-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Are the MIA and MSKCC nomograms useful in selecting patients with melanoma for sentinel lymph node biopsy?MIA 和 MSKCC 列线图是否有助于选择黑色素瘤患者进行前哨淋巴结活检?
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1167-1173. doi: 10.1002/jso.27231. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
Population-Based Validation of the MIA and MSKCC Tools for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status.基于人群的 MIA 和 MSKCC 工具预测前哨淋巴结状态的验证。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Mar 1;159(3):260-268. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6904.
3
Clinical Utility of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Nomograms.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检列线图的临床应用
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jan 1;238(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000886. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
4
Improved Risk Prediction Calculator for Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Melanoma: The Melanoma Institute Australia Nomogram.澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图:改良的黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性风险预测计算器。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;38(24):2719-2727. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02362. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Sentinel lymph node positivity in melanoma: Which risk prediction tool is most accurate?黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结阳性:哪种风险预测工具最准确?
Surgery. 2024 Oct;176(4):1143-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.035. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
6
Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis and validation study of the MSKCC nomogram in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结转移的危险因素及 MSKCC 列线图的验证研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov;42(11):1002-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys150.
7
Applicability of two different validated models to predict axillary non-sentinel lymph node status by sentinel node biopsy in a single Italian center.在意大利的一个单一中心,两种不同的验证模型通过前哨淋巴结活检预测腋窝非前哨淋巴结状态的适用性。
Breast Cancer. 2015 Jul;22(4):350-5. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0485-z. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
8
Validation of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients an international comparison.MSKCC 列线图预测前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移的验证:国际比较。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(7):538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
Comparative validation of online nomograms for predicting nonsentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer.预测前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结状态的在线列线图的比较验证
Arch Surg. 2011 Sep;146(9):1035-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.201.
10
Predicting the likelihood of additional lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer: validation of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram.预测前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌中额外淋巴结转移的可能性:纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)列线图的验证。
J Clin Pathol. 2014 Feb;67(2):112-9. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201524. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of risk prediction models for sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma in a high UV index region.高紫外线指数地区黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移风险预测模型的验证
JAAD Int. 2025 Jun 6;21:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2025.04.012. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparing Two Gene Expression Profile Tests to Standard of Care for Identifying Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma at Low Risk of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.比较两种基因表达谱检测与识别前哨淋巴结阳性低风险皮肤黑色素瘤患者的标准治疗方法。
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2025 May 3;5(3):261-267. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10438. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
3
A Prospective, Multicenter Analysis of Recurrence-Free Survival After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Decisions Influenced by the 31-GEP.一项受31基因表达谱影响的前哨淋巴结活检决策后无复发生存率的前瞻性多中心分析
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70839. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70839.
4
Surgical Management of Thick Primary Cutaneous Melanoma in the US.美国原发性厚皮黑色素瘤的手术治疗
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(4):e70578. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70578.
5
A prospective, multicenter analysis of the integrated 31-gene expression profile test for sentinel lymph node biopsy (i31-GEP for SLNB) test demonstrates reduced number of unnecessary SLNBs in patients with cutaneous melanoma.一项针对前哨淋巴结活检的综合31基因表达谱检测(i31-GEP用于SLNB)的前瞻性多中心分析表明,皮肤黑色素瘤患者中不必要的前哨淋巴结活检数量有所减少。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 3;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03640-x.
6
ASO Author Reflections: Eroding Utility of Prognostic Tools for Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis During Two Decades.美国骨科学会作者反思:二十年来黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移预后工具的效用逐渐降低。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2767-2768. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16771-y. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
7
Declining Clinical Utility of Tools for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Status: A Single Institution Experience from 2000 to 2021.预测前哨淋巴结活检状态工具的临床效用下降:2000年至2021年的单机构经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1463-1472. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16698-4. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
8
Are Nomograms Useful for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Melanoma Patients?列线图对预测黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结状态有用吗?
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;131(4):685-693. doi: 10.1002/jso.27976. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
9
The 31-Gene Expression Profile Test Outperforms AJCC in Stratifying Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Stage I Cutaneous Melanoma.31基因表达谱检测在I期皮肤黑色素瘤患者复发风险分层方面优于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 9;16(2):287. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020287.
10
Validation of the Melanoma Institute of Australia's Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Risk Prediction Tool for Cutaneous Melanoma.澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所前哨淋巴结活检风险预测工具对皮肤黑色素瘤的验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2737-2746. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14862-w. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Performance and Clinical Usefulness in Prediction Models With Survival Outcomes: Practical Guidance for Cox Proportional Hazards Models.评估生存结局预测模型的性能和临床实用性:Cox 比例风险模型的实用指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jan;176(1):105-114. doi: 10.7326/M22-0844. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review.医疗保健中基于人工智能的预测模型的指南和质量标准:一项范围综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 10;5(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7.
3
Predicting sentinel node positivity in patients with melanoma: external validation of a risk-prediction calculator (the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram) using a large European population-based patient cohort.预测黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性:使用大型欧洲基于人群的患者队列对风险预测计算器(澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图)进行外部验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;185(2):412-418. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19895. Epub 2021 May 9.
4
External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?预后模型的外部验证:是什么、为什么、如何、何时以及何地?
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling in Cutaneous Melanoma: Identifying the Knowledge Gaps and Assessing the Clinical Benefit.皮肤黑色素瘤的预后基因表达谱分析:识别知识空白并评估临床获益。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Sep 1;156(9):1004-1011. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1729.
6
Improved Risk Prediction Calculator for Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients With Melanoma: The Melanoma Institute Australia Nomogram.澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所列线图:改良的黑色素瘤患者前哨淋巴结阳性风险预测计算器。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;38(24):2719-2727. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02362. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis.解读决策曲线分析的简易分步指南。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Oct 4;3:18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0064-7. eCollection 2019.
8
Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators.报告和解读决策曲线分析:研究人员指南。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
9
Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移的完全解剖或观察
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2211-2222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210.
10
Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use.使用决策曲线评估风险预测模型的临床影响:正确解读和合理使用指南
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 20;34(21):2534-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.5654. Epub 2016 May 31.