Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 3;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00648-z.
Action to address the structural determinants of health inequalities is prioritized in high-level initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and many national health strategies. Yet, the focus of much local policy and practice is on behaviour change. Research shows that whilst lifestyle approaches can improve population health, at best they fail to reduce health inequalities because they fail to address upstream structural determinants of behaviour and health outcomes. In health research, most efforts have been directed at three streams of work: understanding causal pathways; evaluating the equity impact of national policy; and developing and evaluating lifestyle/behavioural approaches to health improvement. As a result, there is a dearth of research on effective interventions to reduce health inequalities that can be developed and implemented at a local level.
To describe an initiative that aimed to mainstream a focus on health equity in a large-scale research collaboration in the United Kingdom and to assess the impact on organizational culture, research processes and individual research practice.
The study used multiple qualitative methods including semi-structured interviews, focus groups and workshops (n = 131 respondents including Public Advisers, university, National Health Service (NHS), and local and document review.
utilizing Extended Normalization Process Theory (ENPT) and gender mainstreaming theory, the evaluation illuminated (i) the processes developed by Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast to integrate ways of thinking and acting to tackle the upstream social determinants of health inequities (i.e. to mainstream a health equity focus) and (ii) the factors that promoted or frustrated these efforts.
Findings highlight the role of contextual factors and processes aimed at developing and implementing a robust strategy for mainstreaming health equity as building blocks for transformative change in applied health research.
在联合国可持续发展目标和许多国家卫生战略等高级别倡议中,优先考虑解决健康不平等的结构性决定因素。然而,许多地方政策和实践的重点是行为改变。研究表明,虽然生活方式方法可以改善人口健康,但充其量它们未能减少健康不平等,因为它们未能解决行为和健康结果的上游结构性决定因素。在健康研究中,大多数努力都集中在三个方面的工作上:了解因果途径;评估国家政策的公平影响;以及开发和评估改善生活方式/行为的方法来促进健康。因此,缺乏能够在地方一级开发和实施的减少健康不平等的有效干预措施的研究。
描述一项旨在将关注健康公平的重点纳入英国大规模研究合作的计划,并评估其对组织文化、研究过程和个人研究实践的影响。
该研究采用了多种定性方法,包括半结构化访谈、焦点小组和研讨会(n=131 名受访者,包括公众顾问、大学、国民保健制度(NHS)和地方和文件审查)。
利用扩展的规范化进程理论(ENPT)和性别主流化理论,评估结果阐明了(i)应用健康研究和护理西北海岸合作组织为整合解决健康不平等的上游社会决定因素(即主流关注健康公平)的思维和行动方式而开发的过程,以及(ii)促进或阻碍这些努力的因素。
研究结果强调了旨在制定和实施主流健康公平的稳健战略的背景因素和进程的作用,这是应用健康研究变革的基石。