• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何(或不)……在进行健康研究时如何纳入公平性:试用 8Quity 工具的经验教训。

How to do (or not to do)…how to embed equity in the conduct of health research: lessons from piloting the 8Quity tool.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, 308, Third Floor, Elegance Tower, Plot No. 8, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi 110025, India.

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):571-578. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad010.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czad010
PMID:36760178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10089062/
Abstract

Global health research reflects and can either perpetuate or challenge the complex power hierarchies and inequities that characterize our health systems and the societies in which they are situated. The imperative to embed equity in health research aligns with broader efforts globally to promote equitable partnerships among researchers, and between researchers and the communities potentially impacted by their research, or with whom knowledge is co-produced. We describe lessons learnt from piloting a heuristic and diagnostic tool for researchers to assess integration of equity considerations into their research practices. The '8Quity' tool comprises eight domains of equity we developed which roughly correspond to the typical stages in the research process-from team formation to capacity strengthening, research ethics and governance to relationships with research partners, participants and stakeholders beyond the project period. Resources that detail how this can be done on a practical level are also shared, corresponding to each of the eight domains. We acknowledge that tools like 8Quity may be helpful, even necessary, but are insufficient for the broader societal changes required to ensure equity in the research enterprise. However, by firmly setting intentions and accountabilities within our research practices, we (as researchers) can play a role, however modest, in turning the tide of the injustices that leave some communities behind.

摘要

全球卫生研究反映并可能加剧或挑战我们的卫生系统和所在社会的复杂权力等级和不平等现象。将公平性纳入卫生研究的必要性与全球范围内更广泛的努力一致,即促进研究人员之间以及研究人员与可能受其研究影响或与其共同产生知识的社区之间的公平伙伴关系。我们描述了从试点研究人员评估其研究实践中公平性考虑因素整合情况的启发式和诊断工具中吸取的经验教训。“8Quity”工具包括我们开发的八个公平领域,大致对应研究过程的典型阶段,从团队组建到能力建设,从研究伦理和治理到与项目期间之外的研究伙伴、参与者和利益相关者的关系。还分享了与八个领域相对应的详细说明如何在实践层面上实现这一目标的资源。我们承认,像 8Quity 这样的工具可能是有帮助的,甚至是必要的,但对于确保研究企业公平所需的更广泛的社会变革来说是不够的。然而,通过在我们的研究实践中坚定地设定意图和问责制,我们(作为研究人员)可以在扭转使一些社区落后的不公正现象的潮流中发挥微不足道的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ff/10089062/192ea0550661/czad010f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ff/10089062/192ea0550661/czad010f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ff/10089062/192ea0550661/czad010f1.jpg

相似文献

1
How to do (or not to do)…how to embed equity in the conduct of health research: lessons from piloting the 8Quity tool.如何(或不)……在进行健康研究时如何纳入公平性:试用 8Quity 工具的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):571-578. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad010.
2
Assessing how global health partnerships function: an equity-informed critical interpretive synthesis.评估全球卫生伙伴关系如何运作:基于公平性的批判性解释性综合分析。
Global Health. 2021 Jul 2;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00726-z.
3
A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on.经过125年的发展,如今开展了多步骤分析并共同制定了原则,以支持与利物浦热带医学院建立公平的伙伴关系。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 31;4(5):e0002091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002091. eCollection 2024.
4
Fostering the conduct of ethical and equitable research practices: the imperative for integrated knowledge translation in research conducted by and with indigenous community members.促进道德和公平的研究实践:由原住民社区成员开展并与他们合作开展的研究中进行综合知识转化的必要性。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Nov 26;4:45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0131-1. eCollection 2018.
5
The CCGHR Principles for Global Health Research: Centering equity in research, knowledge translation, and practice.CCGHR 全球健康研究原则:以研究、知识转化和实践为中心,关注公平。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112530. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112530. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
Making a commitment to ethics in global health research partnerships: a practical tool to support ethical practice.在全球卫生研究伙伴关系中坚守伦理道德:支持道德实践的实用工具。
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Mar;12(1):137-46. doi: 10.1007/s11673-014-9604-6. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
8
Co-designing a health promotion program for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander girls: lessons learnt.为澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民女孩共同设计一个促进健康的项目:经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Apr 1;38(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad011.
9
Building and Sustaining Effective Partnerships for Training the Next Generation of Global Health Leaders.建立和维持有效的伙伴关系,以培养下一代全球卫生领导者。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3214. eCollection 2021.
10
COVID-19 and unintended steps towards further equity in global health research.COVID-19 和全球卫生研究进一步公平化的意外步骤。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011888.

引用本文的文献

1
How equitable is the conduct of public health research? Findings across case studies from India and Australia.公共卫生研究的开展有多公平?来自印度和澳大利亚的案例研究结果
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 8;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02593-1.
2
A Review of Reviews of Patient-Reported Measures in Psychosis: Need to Consider Factors Affecting Equity and the Involvement of Patients.精神病患者报告测量的综述之综述:需要考虑影响公平性的因素及患者的参与情况。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2025 Jan 11;6(1):sgae032. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae032. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Is decolonisation sufficient?去殖民化是否足够?
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011564.
2
The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.全球卫生伙伴关系估值的公平工具。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00316. Print 2022 Apr 28.
3
Overcoming structural barriers to sharing power with communities in global health research priority-setting: Lessons from the Participation for Local Action project in Karnataka, India.克服全球健康研究优先事项设定中与社区分享权力的结构性障碍:来自印度卡纳塔克邦参与地方行动项目的经验教训。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec;17(12):3334-3352. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2058048. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
4
A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research.促进卫生研究中伦理惠益分享的框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008096.
5
Considerations for improving diversity, equity and inclusivity within research designs and teams.考虑在研究设计和团队中提高多样性、公平性和包容性。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jan;307:114295. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114295. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
6
Toward intersectional and culturally relevant sex and gender analysis in health research.朝向健康研究中的交叉和文化相关的性与性别分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114459. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114459. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
7
Structural Intersectionality as a New Direction for Health Disparities Research.结构交叉性作为健康不平等研究的新方向。
J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Sep;62(3):350-370. doi: 10.1177/00221465211032947. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
Sharing power in global health research: an ethical toolkit for designing priority-setting processes that meaningfully include communities.在全球卫生研究中共享权力:一个用于设计有意义地纳入社区的优先事项设定过程的伦理工具包。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 25;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01453-y.
9
Directing Research Toward Health Equity: a Health Equity Research Impact Assessment.引导研究促进健康公平:健康公平研究影响评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2803-2808. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06789-3. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
From fringe to centre-stage: experiences of mainstreaming health equity in a health research collaboration.从边缘到中心舞台:在健康研究合作中实现健康公平主流化的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 3;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00648-z.