Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jun 21;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01925-3.
With their close connection to community and increasing preventive health remit, local governments are well positioned to implement policies and programs to address health inequities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence of equity-focused policy action in this sector. We aimed to understand how local government representatives approach equity in the development and implementation of health and wellbeing policies and programs, and to identify potential enablers for strengthening an equity focus.
We conducted semi-structured interviews (June 2022-January 2023) with 29 health directorate representatives from 21 local governments in Victoria, Australia. Representatives were recruited from urban, regional and rural local government areas, with varying levels of socioeconomic position. Data was analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, informed by social determinants of health theory and a public policy decision making framework.
Local governments approach health equity in different ways including focusing on priority populations, disadvantaged geographic areas, or by targeting the upstream determinants of health, such as housing and employment. Enabling factors for more equity-oriented local government policy action included those internal to local governments: (i) having a clear conceptualisation of equity, (ii) fostering a strong equity-centric culture, and (iii) developing organisational-wide competency in health equity. External factors related to key stakeholder groups that support and/or influence local governments included: (iv) strong support from community, (v) state government leadership and legislation, and (vi) supportive local partners, networks and NGO's.
Local governments have a responsibility to implement policies and programs that improve health and reduce health inequities. Local government's capacity to leverage resources, structures, processes and relationships, internally and across sectors and community, will be key to strengthening equity-oriented local government health policies and programs.
由于与社区的紧密联系以及不断增加的预防保健职权,地方政府完全有能力实施政策和计划,以解决健康不平等问题。然而,在这一领域,缺乏以公平为重点的政策行动的证据。我们旨在了解地方政府代表在制定和实施健康和福利政策和计划时如何处理公平问题,并确定加强公平重点的潜在促进因素。
我们对澳大利亚维多利亚州 21 个地方政府的 29 名卫生署代表进行了半结构化访谈(2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 1 月)。这些代表是从城市、地区和农村地区的地方政府招募的,社会经济地位各不相同。数据采用 Braun 和 Clarke 的反思性主题分析进行了归纳分析,该分析受健康决定因素和公共政策决策框架的影响。
地方政府以不同的方式处理健康公平问题,包括关注重点人群、弱势地理区域,或针对健康的上游决定因素,如住房和就业。更注重地方政府政策行动公平性的促进因素包括地方政府内部的因素:(一)对公平有明确的概念化;(二)培养强大的以公平为中心的文化;(三)在整个组织中发展健康公平方面的能力。与支持和/或影响地方政府的主要利益相关者群体有关的外部因素包括:(四)来自社区的大力支持;(五)州政府的领导和立法;以及(六)支持性的地方伙伴、网络和非政府组织。
地方政府有责任实施改善健康和减少健康不平等的政策和计划。地方政府利用资源、结构、流程和关系的能力,无论是内部的还是跨部门和社区的,都将是加强以公平为导向的地方政府卫生政策和计划的关键。