• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国用药史共享计划对一家三级教学医院护理流程及终端用户体验的影响:队列研究与横断面研究

Impact of a Nationwide Medication History Sharing Program on the Care Process and End-User Experience in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital: Cohort Study and Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Cho Jungwon, Yoo Sooyoung, Lee Eunkyung Euni, Lee Ho-Young

机构信息

College of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pharmacy, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 20;12:e53079. doi: 10.2196/53079.

DOI:10.2196/53079
PMID:38533775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11004625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timely and comprehensive collection of a patient's medication history in the emergency department (ED) is crucial for optimizing health care delivery. The implementation of a medication history sharing program, titled "Patient's In-home Medications at a Glance," in a tertiary teaching hospital aimed to efficiently collect and display nationwide medication histories for patients' initial hospital visits.

OBJECTIVE

As an evaluation was necessary to provide a balanced picture of the program, we aimed to evaluate both care process outcomes and humanistic outcomes encompassing end-user experience of physicians and pharmacists.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study and a cross-sectional study to evaluate both outcomes. To evaluate the care process, we measured the time from the first ED assessment to urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) initiation from electronic health records. To assess end-user experience, we developed a 22-item questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale, including 5 domains: information quality, system quality, service quality, user satisfaction, and intention to reuse. This questionnaire was validated and distributed to physicians and pharmacists. The Mann-Whiteny U test was used to analyze the PCI initiation time, and structural equation modeling was used to assess factors affecting end-user experience.

RESULTS

The time from the first ED assessment to urgent PCI initiation at the ED was significantly decreased using the patient medication history program (mean rank 42.14 min vs 28.72 min; Mann-Whitney U=346; P=.03). A total of 112 physicians and pharmacists participated in the survey. Among the 5 domains, "intention to reuse" received the highest score (mean 4.77, SD 0.37), followed by "user satisfaction" (mean 4.56, SD 0.49), while "service quality" received the lowest score (mean 3.87, SD 0.79). "User satisfaction" was significantly associated with "information quality" and "intention to reuse."

CONCLUSIONS

Timely and complete retrieval using a medication history-sharing program led to an improved care process by expediting critical decision-making in the ED, thereby contributing to value-based health care delivery in a real-world setting. The experiences of end users, including physicians and pharmacists, indicated satisfaction with the program regarding information quality and their intention to reuse.

摘要

背景

在急诊科及时全面地收集患者用药史对于优化医疗服务至关重要。在一家三级教学医院实施了一项名为“患者居家用药一览”的用药史共享项目,旨在高效收集并展示患者初次就诊时的全国用药史。

目的

由于需要进行评估以全面了解该项目,我们旨在评估护理过程结果和人文结果,包括医生和药剂师的最终用户体验。

方法

我们进行了一项队列研究和一项横断面研究以评估这两种结果。为评估护理过程,我们从电子健康记录中测量了从首次急诊科评估到紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)开始的时间。为评估最终用户体验,我们使用5点李克特量表编制了一份包含22个条目的问卷,包括5个领域:信息质量、系统质量、服务质量、用户满意度和再使用意愿。该问卷经过验证并分发给医生和药剂师。使用曼-惠特尼U检验分析PCI开始时间,并使用结构方程模型评估影响最终用户体验的因素。

结果

使用患者用药史项目后,从首次急诊科评估到急诊科紧急PCI开始的时间显著缩短(平均秩次42.14分钟对28.72分钟;曼-惠特尼U = 346;P = 0.03)。共有112名医生和药剂师参与了调查。在5个领域中,“再使用意愿”得分最高(平均4.77,标准差0.37),其次是“用户满意度”(平均4.56,标准差0.49),而“服务质量”得分最低(平均3.87,标准差0.79)。“用户满意度”与“信息质量”和“再使用意愿”显著相关。

结论

使用用药史共享项目及时完整地检索信息,通过加快急诊科的关键决策改善了护理过程,从而有助于在现实环境中提供基于价值的医疗服务。包括医生和药剂师在内的最终用户的体验表明,他们对该项目的信息质量和再使用意愿感到满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/bda5124a101d/medinform-v12-e53079-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/8d8605598fc3/medinform-v12-e53079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/8afe494504fe/medinform-v12-e53079-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/bda5124a101d/medinform-v12-e53079-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/8d8605598fc3/medinform-v12-e53079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/8afe494504fe/medinform-v12-e53079-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d6/11004625/bda5124a101d/medinform-v12-e53079-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a Nationwide Medication History Sharing Program on the Care Process and End-User Experience in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital: Cohort Study and Cross-Sectional Study.全国用药史共享计划对一家三级教学医院护理流程及终端用户体验的影响:队列研究与横断面研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 20;12:e53079. doi: 10.2196/53079.
2
A Comparison of Patient and Provider Perspectives on an Electronic Health Record-Based Discharge Communication Tool: Survey Study.患者与医疗服务提供者对基于电子健康记录的出院沟通工具的看法比较:调查研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jan 29;8:e60506. doi: 10.2196/60506.
3
Best practices: improving patient outcomes and costs in an ACO through comprehensive medication therapy management.最佳实践:通过全面药物治疗管理改善 ACO 中的患者预后和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Dec;20(12):1152-8.
4
Continuity of care with a one-click medication history program: Patient's in-home medications at a glance.一键式用药史程序实现连续护理:患者在家中的用药一览无余。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104710. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104710. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
Pharmacist-acquired medication histories in a university hospital emergency department.大学医院急诊科药师获取的用药史
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Dec 15;63(24):2500-3. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060028.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
User Experience of Persons Using Ingestible Sensor-Enabled Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Infection: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.使用可摄入传感器增强型暴露前预防措施预防 HIV 感染的使用者的用户体验:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 May 3;12:e53596. doi: 10.2196/53596.
8
A Pilot of Digital Whiteboards for Improving Patient Satisfaction in the Emergency Department: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.一项关于使用数字白板提高急诊科患者满意度的试点研究:非随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 21;7:e44725. doi: 10.2196/44725.
9
Best Practices: Improving Patient Outcomes and Costs in an ACO Through Comprehensive Medication Therapy Management.最佳实践:通过全面药物治疗管理改善 ACO 中的患者预后和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Dec;20(12):1152-8.
10
Medication Therapy Management: 10 Years of Experience in a Large Integrated Health Care System.药物治疗管理:在大型综合性医疗保健系统中的 10 年经验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Sep;26(9):1057-1066. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1057.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Delphi Process in Acupuncture Decision Making: Overall Descriptions and Quality Assessment of Delphi Reports.改进针灸决策中的德尔菲法:德尔菲报告的总体描述与质量评估
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 30;17:4243-4256. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S481947. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of complete medication history to identify and correct transitions-of-care medication errors at psychiatric hospital admission.使用完整的用药史在精神科住院时识别和纠正医疗照护转接中的用药错误。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0279903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279903. eCollection 2023.
2
Effects of a pharmacy-driven medication history program on patient outcomes.药房驱动的用药史方案对患者结局的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Sep 22;79(19):1652-1662. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac143.
3
Continuity of care with a one-click medication history program: Patient's in-home medications at a glance.
一键式用药史程序实现连续护理:患者在家中的用药一览无余。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104710. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104710. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Evaluative Frameworks and Models for Health Information Systems (HIS) and Health Information Technologies (HIT).健康信息系统 (HIS) 和健康信息技术 (HIT) 的评估框架和模型。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:280-285. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210914.
5
Measuring Success of Patients' Continuous Use of Mobile Health Services for Self-management of Chronic Conditions: Model Development and Validation.测量患者使用移动医疗服务进行慢性病自我管理的持续使用效果:模型开发与验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 13;23(7):e26670. doi: 10.2196/26670.
6
Physicians' Use of the Computerized Physician Order Entry System for Medication Prescribing: Systematic Review.医生使用计算机化医嘱录入系统开具药物处方:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e22923. doi: 10.2196/22923.
7
Evaluating health information technologies: A systematic review of framework recommendations.评估健康信息技术:框架建议的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Oct;142:104247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104247. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
8
Identifying the Roles of Healthcare Leaders in HIT Implementation: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence.确定医疗保健领导者在医疗信息技术实施中的角色:对定量和定性证据的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082865.
9
What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model.增强在线健康信息网站感知益处的质量因素有哪些?更新的德洛恩和麦克林信息系统成功模型的应用。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 May;137:104093. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104093. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
Toward Value-Based Healthcare through Interactive Process Mining in Emergency Rooms: The Stroke Case.通过急诊交互式流程挖掘实现基于价值的医疗保健:中风案例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 20;16(10):1783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101783.