Abramson Erika L, Patel Vaishali, Pfoh Elizabeth R, Kaushal Rainu
Erika Abramson, MD, MS, Departments of Pediatrics and Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Rm M 610A, New York, NY 10065, Tel: 212-746-3929, Fax: 212-746-3140, Email:
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Oct 26;7(4):994-1006. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-04-RA-0069.
Physicians are expending tremendous resources transitioning to new electronic health records (EHRs), with electronic prescribing as a key functionality of most systems. Physician dissatisfaction post-transition can be quite marked, especially initially. However, little is known about how physicians' experiences using new EHRs for e-prescribing evolve over time. We previously published a qualitative case study about the early physician experience transitioning from an older to a newer, more robust EHR, in the outpatient setting, focusing on their perceptions of the electronic prescribing functionality.
Our current objective was to examine how perceptions about using the new HER evolved over time, again with a focus on electronic prescribing.
We interviewed thirteen internists at an academic medical center-affiliated ambulatory care clinic who transitioned to the new EHR two years prior. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze semi-structured interviews and generate key themes.
We identified five themes: efficiency and usability, effects on safety, ongoing training requirements, customization, and competing priorities for the EHR. We found that for even experienced e-prescribers, achieving prior levels of perceived prescribing efficiency took nearly two years. Despite the fact that speed in performing prescribing-related tasks was highly important, most were still not utilizing system short cuts or customization features designed to maximize efficiency. Alert fatigue remained common. However, direct transmission of prescriptions to pharmacies was highly valued and its benefits generally outweighed the other features considered poorly designed for physician workflow.
Ensuring that physicians are able to do key prescribing tasks efficiently is critical to the perceived value of e-prescribing applications. However, successful transitions may take longer than expected and e-prescribing system features that do not support workflow or require constant upgrades may further prolong the process. Additionally, as system features continually evolve, physicians may need ongoing training and support to maintain efficiency.
医生们正在投入大量资源向新的电子健康记录(EHR)过渡,电子处方是大多数系统的关键功能。过渡后医生的不满情绪可能会很明显,尤其是在初期。然而,对于医生使用新EHR进行电子处方的体验如何随时间演变,人们了解甚少。我们之前发表了一篇定性案例研究,讲述了门诊环境中医生从较旧的EHR过渡到更新、更强大的EHR的早期体验,重点是他们对电子处方功能的看法。
我们当前的目标是研究对使用新EHR的看法如何随时间演变,同样以电子处方为重点。
我们采访了一家学术医疗中心附属门诊诊所的13名内科医生,他们在两年前过渡到了新的EHR。我们采用扎根理论方法分析半结构化访谈并生成关键主题。
我们确定了五个主题:效率和可用性、对安全性的影响、持续培训需求、定制以及EHR的相互竞争的优先事项。我们发现,即使对于经验丰富的电子开方者来说,达到之前的开方效率水平也需要近两年时间。尽管执行与开方相关任务的速度非常重要,但大多数人仍未使用旨在提高效率的系统快捷方式或定制功能。警报疲劳仍然很常见。然而,处方直接传输到药房受到高度重视,其好处通常超过了其他被认为对医生工作流程设计不佳的功能。
确保医生能够高效地完成关键的开方任务对于电子处方应用的感知价值至关重要。然而,成功过渡可能比预期的时间更长,不支持工作流程或需要不断升级的电子处方系统功能可能会进一步延长这一过程。此外,随着系统功能不断发展,医生可能需要持续的培训和支持来保持效率。