Suppr超能文献

使用充水导管比较中心静脉压、食管压和口腔闭塞压以评估健康成年人胸膜压力变化

Comparison of central venous, oesophageal and mouth occlusion pressure with water-filled catheters for estimating pleural pressure changes in healthy adults.

作者信息

Flemale A, Gillard C, Dierckx J P

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1988 Jan;1(1):51-7.

PMID:3366236
Abstract

The validity of the central venous and water-filled oesophageal catheter technique as a measure of pleural pressure changes was tested in ten healthy subjects in different body positions during inspiratory efforts with occluded airways, by comparing the simultaneous changes in mouth pressure (delta Pm) taken to represent pleural pressure changes, in central venous pressure (delta Pcv) and in oesophageal pressure (delta Poes). delta Pcv/delta Pm values were close to unity in the sitting and left lateral positions, whereas in the supine and right lateral position, substantial deviations from unity were found in some instances. delta Poes/delta Pm values were close to unity in all positions, except some rare instances. No appreciable phase difference between delta Pm/delta Poes and delta Pm/delta Pcv was found when the amplitude ratios were close to unity. We conclude that valid measurements of pleural pressure changes can be obtained in most instances with the central venous and the water-filled oesophageal catheter system according to the occlusion test procedure.

摘要

通过比较代表胸膜压力变化的口腔压力(ΔPm)、中心静脉压(ΔPcv)和食管压力(ΔPoes)的同步变化,对10名健康受试者在气道阻塞吸气时处于不同体位下,中心静脉和充水食管导管技术作为测量胸膜压力变化的有效性进行了测试。在坐位和左侧卧位时,ΔPcv/ΔPm值接近1,而在仰卧位和右侧卧位时,在某些情况下发现与1有显著偏差。除了一些罕见情况外,在所有体位下ΔPoes/ΔPm值都接近1。当振幅比接近1时,未发现ΔPm/ΔPoes和ΔPm/ΔPcv之间有明显的相位差。我们得出结论,根据闭塞试验程序,在大多数情况下,使用中心静脉和充水食管导管系统可以获得胸膜压力变化的有效测量值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验