• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同乳酸菌及其组合对青贮苜蓿发酵过程的调控:青贮特性、细菌群落动态及其功能转变。

Different lactic acid bacteria and their combinations regulated the fermentation process of ensiled alfalfa: ensiling characteristics, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts.

作者信息

Bai Jie, Ding Zitong, Ke Wencan, Xu Dongmei, Wang Museng, Huang Wenkang, Zhang Yixin, Liu Fang, Guo Xusheng

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, China.

出版信息

Microb Biotechnol. 2021 May;14(3):1171-1182. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13785. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1111/1751-7915.13785
PMID:33666350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085944/
Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the adaptation and competition of Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus and Enterococcus faecalis inoculated in alfalfa silage alone or in combination on the fermentation quality, dynamics of bacterial community, and their functional shifts using single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing technology. Before ensiling, alfalfa was inoculated with L. plantarum (Lp), P. pentosaceus (Pp), E. faecalis (Ef) or their combinations (LpPp, LpEf, LpPpEf) and sampled at 1, 3, 7, 14 and 60 days. After 60-days fermentation, the Lp-, Pp- and LpPp-inoculated silages had lower pH but greater concentrations of lactic acid were observed in Pp, LpEf and LpPpEf-inoculated silages. The inoculants altered the keystone taxa and the bacterial community dynamics in different manners, where L. plantarum, Weissella cibaria and L. pentosaceus dominated the bacterial communities after 14 days-fermentation in all treatments. The silages with better fermentation quality had simplified bacterial correlation structures. Moreover, different inoculants dramatically changed the carbohydrate, amino acid, energy, nucleotide and vitamin metabolism of bacterial communities during ensiling. Results of the current study indicate that effect of different inoculants on alfalfa silage fermentation was implemented by modulating the succession of bacterial community, their interactions and metabolic pathways as well during ensiling.

摘要

本研究的目的是利用单分子实时(SMRT)测序技术,研究单独或组合接种植物乳杆菌、戊糖片球菌和粪肠球菌的苜蓿青贮饲料的适应性和竞争性,以及对发酵品质、细菌群落动态及其功能转变的影响。青贮前,苜蓿接种植物乳杆菌(Lp)、戊糖片球菌(Pp)、粪肠球菌(Ef)或它们的组合(LpPp、LpEf、LpPpEf),并在第1、3、7、14和60天取样。经过60天的发酵,接种Lp、Pp和LpPp的青贮饲料pH值较低,但在接种Pp、LpEf和LpPpEf的青贮饲料中观察到更高的乳酸浓度。接种剂以不同方式改变了关键类群和细菌群落动态,在所有处理中,发酵14天后,植物乳杆菌、食窦魏斯氏菌和戊糖乳杆菌在细菌群落中占主导地位。发酵品质较好的青贮饲料具有简化的细菌相关结构。此外,不同的接种剂在青贮过程中显著改变了细菌群落的碳水化合物、氨基酸、能量、核苷酸和维生素代谢。本研究结果表明,不同接种剂对苜蓿青贮发酵的影响是通过调节青贮过程中细菌群落的演替、它们的相互作用和代谢途径来实现的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/cdb3cbb3b6dc/MBT2-14-1171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/54b842b806bb/MBT2-14-1171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/1f3f56979890/MBT2-14-1171-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/b14445c891e4/MBT2-14-1171-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/cdb3cbb3b6dc/MBT2-14-1171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/54b842b806bb/MBT2-14-1171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/1f3f56979890/MBT2-14-1171-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/b14445c891e4/MBT2-14-1171-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/8085944/cdb3cbb3b6dc/MBT2-14-1171-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Different lactic acid bacteria and their combinations regulated the fermentation process of ensiled alfalfa: ensiling characteristics, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts.不同乳酸菌及其组合对青贮苜蓿发酵过程的调控:青贮特性、细菌群落动态及其功能转变。
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 May;14(3):1171-1182. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13785. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Metagenomics analysis reveals the performance of homo- and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria in alfalfa silage fermentation, bacterial community, and functional profiles.宏基因组学分析揭示了同型和异型发酵乳酸菌在苜蓿青贮发酵、细菌群落和功能谱中的性能。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad163.
3
Dry matter content and inoculant alter the metabolome and bacterial community of alfalfa ensiled at high temperature.干物质含量和接种剂会改变高温青贮苜蓿的代谢组和细菌群落。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023 Jun;107(11):3443-3457. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12535-y. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar.添加和不添加乳酸菌接种剂及糖的直接刈割苜蓿青贮过程中微生物群落的动态变化
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jun;122(6):1456-1470. doi: 10.1111/jam.13456. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Storage Temperature Is More Effective Than Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculations in Manipulating Fermentation and Bacterial Community Diversity, Co-Occurrence and Functionality of the Whole-Plant Corn Silage.在调控全株玉米青贮发酵、细菌群落多样性、共存关系和功能方面,贮藏温度比接种乳酸菌更有效。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0010122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00101-22. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Bacterial Community and Fermentation Quality of Ensiling Alfalfa With Commercial Lactic Acid Bacterial Additives.添加商业乳酸菌制剂的苜蓿青贮饲料的细菌群落与发酵品质
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 22;13:836899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.836899. eCollection 2022.
7
Novel lactic acid bacteria strains as inoculants on alfalfa silage fermentation.新型乳酸菌菌株作为苜蓿青贮发酵的接种剂。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 29;9(1):8007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44520-9.
8
Effect of lactobacilli inoculation on protein and carbohydrate fractions, ensiling characteristics and bacterial community of alfalfa silage.乳酸菌接种对苜蓿青贮饲料蛋白质和碳水化合物组分、青贮特性及细菌群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 5;13:1070175. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1070175. eCollection 2022.
9
Changes in physico-chemical characteristics and viable bacterial communities during fermentation of alfalfa silages inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum.添加植物乳杆菌发酵苜蓿青贮过程中理化特性和活菌群落的变化。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jun 28;37(7):127. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03095-2.
10
Dynamics of Bacterial Community and Fermentation Quality during Ensiling of Wilted and Unwilted Leaf Silage with or without Lactic Acid Bacterial Inoculants.萎蔫和未萎蔫叶片青贮中添加或不添加乳酸菌发酵剂时细菌群落动态和发酵品质。
mSphere. 2019 Aug 7;4(4):e00341-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00341-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of additives on nutrient composition, fermentation quality, microflora structure and metabolites of silage.添加剂对青贮饲料营养成分、发酵品质、微生物菌群结构及代谢产物的影响
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 23;12:1635386. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1635386. eCollection 2025.
2
High-moisture alfalfa silage fermentation: a comparative study on the impact of additives including formic acid, , cinnamon essential oil, and wood vinegar.高水分苜蓿青贮发酵:关于甲酸、肉桂精油和木醋液等添加剂影响的比较研究
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul 23:e0000325. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00003-25.
3
High temperatures and antibacterial plant additives change the fermentation quality, free amino acids and lactic acid bacteria fermentation type in Caragana Korshinskii silage.

本文引用的文献

1
The bacterial community and metabolome dynamics and their interactions modulate fermentation process of whole crop corn silage prepared with or without inoculants.细菌群落和代谢组动态及其相互作用调节了添加或不添加接种剂的全株玉米青贮发酵过程。
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 Mar;14(2):561-576. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13623. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Sequencing and microbiota transplantation to determine the role of microbiota on the fermentation type of oat silage.测序和微生物移植以确定微生物群在燕麦青贮发酵类型中的作用。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Aug;309:123371. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123371. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
3
The reconstitution mechanism of napier grass microiota during the ensiling of alfalfa and their contributions to fermentation quality of silage.
高温和抗菌植物添加剂会改变柠条锦鸡儿青贮饲料的发酵品质、游离氨基酸和乳酸菌发酵类型。
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04153-7.
4
Fermentation Characteristics, Nutrient Content, and Microbial Population of L. Silage Produced with Different Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives.不同乳酸菌添加剂制作的李氏青贮饲料的发酵特性、营养成分及微生物种群
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;15(13):1955. doi: 10.3390/ani15131955.
5
Impact of on the fermentation quality, nutritional enhancement, and microbial dynamics of whole plant soybean silage.关于[具体内容缺失]对全株大豆青贮饲料发酵品质、营养强化及微生物动态的影响
Front Microbiol. 2025 May 19;16:1565951. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1565951. eCollection 2025.
6
Enhancing alfalfa and sorghum silage quality using agricultural wastes: fermentation dynamics, microbial communities, and functional insights.利用农业废弃物提高苜蓿和高粱青贮饲料品质:发酵动力学、微生物群落及功能见解
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 May 30;25(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06722-4.
7
The Effect of Silage Microbial Inoculants on the Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa.青贮微生物接种剂对WL358HQ苜蓿青贮品质的影响
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 29;13(5):1026. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13051026.
8
Effects of different additives on fermentation characteristics, nutrient composition and microbial communities of Leymus chinensis silage.不同添加剂对羊草青贮发酵特性、营养成分及微生物群落的影响
BMC Microbiol. 2025 May 15;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04023-2.
9
Assessing the Impact of Silage Inoculants on the Quality of Adina Alfalfa Silage.评估青贮接种剂对水团花苜蓿青贮品质的影响。
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 7;13(4):841. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040841.
10
Producing high-quality and safe whole-plant quinoa silage through selecting variety and harvest time.通过选择品种和收获时间来生产高质量、安全的藜麦全株青贮饲料。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06326-y.
苜蓿青贮过程中象草微芽的再形成机制及其对青贮发酵品质的贡献。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Feb;297:122391. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122391. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Bacterial diversity and fermentation quality of Moringa oleifera leaves silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and stored at different temperatures.添加乳酸菌发酵剂并在不同温度下贮藏的辣木叶片青贮的细菌多样性和发酵品质。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Jul;284:349-358. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.139. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
Fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa and stylo silage mixed with Moringa oleifera leaves.紫花苜蓿和柳枝稷青贮中添加辣木叶对青贮发酵品质及微生物群落的影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Jul;284:240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.129. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Modulation of Metabolome and Bacterial Community in Whole Crop Corn Silage by Inoculating Homofermentative and Heterofermentative .通过接种同型发酵菌和异型发酵菌对全株玉米青贮饲料中代谢组和细菌群落的调控
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 23;9:3299. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03299. eCollection 2018.
7
Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant.无菌和非无菌苜蓿青贮过程中添加或不添加植物乳杆菌接种剂时微生物群落动态和发酵品质。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Mar;275:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.067. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Dynamics of a microbial community during ensiling and upon aerobic exposure in lactic acid bacteria inoculation-treated and untreated barley silages.青贮过程中以及接种乳酸菌处理和未处理大麦青贮有氧暴露期间微生物群落的动态变化。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Feb;273:212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.041. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum.评价饲用大豆与大田玉米或高粱混贮的发酵品质和微生物群落。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Oct;265:563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning.关键种作为微生物群落结构和功能的驱动因子。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Sep;16(9):567-576. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1.