Fitting J W, Bradley T D, Easton P A, Lincoln M J, Goldman M D, Grassino A
Meakins-Christie Laboratories, McGill University, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Université de Montreál, Quebec, Canada.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Mar;64(3):959-65. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.3.959.
To assess rib cage muscle fatigue and its relationship to diaphragmatic fatigue, we recorded the electromyogram (EMG) of the parasternal intercostals (PS), sternocleidomastoid (SM), and platysma with fine wire electrodes and the EMG of the diaphragm (DI) with an esophageal electrode. Six normal subjects were studied during inspiratory resistive breathing. Two different breathing patterns were imposed: mainly diaphragmatic or mainly rib cage breathing. The development of fatigue was assessed by analysis of the high-to-low (H/L) ratio of the EMG. To determine the appropriate frequency bands for the PS and SM, we established their EMG power spectrum by Fourier analysis. The mean and SD for the centroid frequency was 312 +/- 16 Hz for PS and 244 +/- 48 Hz for SM. When breathing with the diaphragmatic patterns, all subjects showed a fall in H/L of the DI and none had a fall in H/L of the PS or SM. During rib cage emphasis, four out of five subjects showed a fall in H/L of the PS and five out of six showed a fall in H/L of the SM. Four subjects showed no fall in H/L of the DI; the other two subjects were unable to inhibit diaphragm activity to a substantial degree and did show a fall in H/L of the DI. Activity of the platysma was minimal or absent during diaphragmatic emphasis but was usually strong during rib cage breathing. We conclude that fatigue of either the diaphragm or the parasternal and sternocleidomastoid can occur independently according to the recruitment pattern of inspiratory muscles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为评估胸廓肌肉疲劳及其与膈肌疲劳的关系,我们用细线电极记录了胸骨旁肋间肌(PS)、胸锁乳突肌(SM)和颈阔肌的肌电图(EMG),并用食管电极记录了膈肌(DI)的EMG。对6名正常受试者在吸气阻力呼吸期间进行了研究。施加了两种不同的呼吸模式:主要为膈肌呼吸或主要为胸廓呼吸。通过分析EMG的高/低(H/L)比值来评估疲劳的发展。为确定PS和SM的合适频段,我们通过傅里叶分析建立了它们的EMG功率谱。PS的质心频率均值和标准差为312±16Hz,SM为244±48Hz。当采用膈肌呼吸模式时,所有受试者的DI的H/L均下降,而PS或SM的H/L均未下降。在强调胸廓呼吸时,五名受试者中有四名的PS的H/L下降,六名受试者中有五名的SM的H/L下降。四名受试者的DI的H/L未下降;另外两名受试者无法充分抑制膈肌活动,其DI的H/L确实下降。在强调膈肌呼吸时,颈阔肌的活动最小或没有,但在胸廓呼吸时通常较强。我们得出结论,膈肌或胸骨旁肌和胸锁乳突肌的疲劳可根据吸气肌的募集模式独立发生。(摘要截断于250字)