Suppr超能文献

鼻咽拭子阴性的COVID-19患者的诊断:放射学和临床诊断的可靠性以及与血清学相比的准确性

Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Patients with Negative Nasopharyngeal Swabs: Reliability of Radiological and Clinical Diagnosis and Accuracy Versus Serology.

作者信息

Mirijello Antonio, Zarrelli Michele, Miscio Giuseppe, de Matthaeis Angela, Piscitelli Pamela, Carbonelli Cristiano Matteo, Di Giorgio Annabella, Inglese Michele, Ciliberti Gianluca Libero, Marciano Carmen, Borelli Cristina, Vergara Doriana, Castorani Giulia, Orciulo Grazia Vittoria, Di Mauro Lazzaro, Carella Massimo, Simeone Annalisa, Copetti Massimiliano, Leone Maurizio Angelo, De Cosmo Salvatore

机构信息

Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

Unit of Neurology, Department of Medical Sciences, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;11(3):386. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030386.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relies on the positivity of nasopharyngeal swab. However, a significant percentage of symptomatic patients may test negative. We evaluated the reliability of COVID-19 diagnosis made by radiologists and clinicians and its accuracy versus serology in a sample of patients hospitalized for suspected COVID-19 with multiple negative swabs.

METHODS

Admission chest CT-scans and clinical records of swab-negative patients, treated according to the COVID-19 protocol or deceased during hospitalization, were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists and two clinicians, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 254 patients, 169 swab-confirmed cases and one patient without chest CT-scan were excluded. A total of 84 patients were eligible for the reliability study. Of these, 21 patients died during hospitalization; the remaining 63 underwent serological testing and were eligible for the accuracy evaluation. Of the 63, 26 patients showed anti-Sars-Cov-2 antibodies, while 37 did not. The inter-rater agreement was "substantial" (kappa 0.683) between radiologists, "moderate" (kappa 0.454) between clinicians, and only "fair" (kappa 0.341) between radiologists and clinicians. Both radiologic and clinical evaluations showed good accuracy compared to serology.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiologic and clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 for swab-negative patients proved to be sufficiently reliable and accurate to allow a diagnosis of COVID-19, which needs to be confirmed by serology and follow-up.

摘要

背景

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的诊断依赖于鼻咽拭子检测呈阳性。然而,相当一部分有症状的患者检测结果可能为阴性。我们评估了放射科医生和临床医生对COVID-19诊断的可靠性及其与血清学相比在因疑似COVID-19住院且多次拭子检测阴性的患者样本中的准确性。

方法

分别由两名放射科医生和两名临床医生对按照COVID-19方案治疗或在住院期间死亡的拭子检测阴性患者的入院胸部CT扫描和临床记录进行回顾性评估。

结果

在254例患者中,排除了169例拭子确诊病例和1例无胸部CT扫描的患者。共有84例患者符合可靠性研究的条件。其中,21例患者在住院期间死亡;其余63例接受了血清学检测,符合准确性评估的条件。在这63例患者中,26例显示抗Sars-CoV-2抗体,37例未显示。放射科医生之间的评分者间一致性为“实质性”(kappa 0.683),临床医生之间为“中等”(kappa 0.454),放射科医生和临床医生之间仅为“一般”(kappa 0.341)。与血清学相比,放射学和临床评估均显示出良好的准确性。

结论

对于拭子检测阴性的患者,COVID-19的放射学和临床诊断被证明具有足够的可靠性和准确性,足以做出COVID-19的诊断,但需要通过血清学和随访来确认。

相似文献

2
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2.
4
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3.

引用本文的文献

5
A "Galactic" Chest X-ray.一张“星系状”胸部X光片。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 18;11(5):899. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050899.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验