Caritas Association Ettlingen, 76275 Ettlingen, Germany.
VIBRAC Centre for Vibroacoustic Therapy and Research, Eino Roiha Foundation, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 16;18(4):1904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041904.
Dementia is a growing issue in modern society. Non-pharmacological interventions such as music are suggested as the primary methods for symptom management. Therapeutic potential may also be found in sound/mechanical low frequency vibrations (LFV) that share the core characteristics of music, but these are lesser understood. The aim of the proposed scoping review is to explore the responses of persons with dementia to LFV, e.g., vibroacoustic therapy or whole-body vibration. The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology guidelines. An extensive search in BMC, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Pedro, ProQuest Central, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature sources in Clinical Trials, Current Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and manual search of relevant journals is planned to find all relevant research papers. The paper selection, full-text assessment, and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. Participants' responses to the interventions and the experiment designs, including methodological challenges, will be analysed and compared. Results may highlight potential gaps in reporting and comparing sound and mechanical vibration approaches and promote better understanding of their potential for managing the symptoms of dementia. Furthermore, the possible relationships between LFV and music-based interventions may become clearer.
痴呆症是现代社会日益严重的问题。非药物干预措施,如音乐,被认为是症状管理的主要方法。声音/机械低频振动(LFV)也可能具有治疗潜力,其具有音乐的核心特征,但人们对其了解较少。本研究旨在探讨痴呆症患者对 LFV 的反应,例如声振疗法或全身振动。该综述将遵循 Joanna Briggs 研究所的方法学指南。计划在 BMC、CINAHL、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、EMBASE、ERIC、MEDLINE(OvidSP)、PEDro、ProQuest 中心、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science 以及临床试验、当前对照试验的灰色文献来源、Google Scholar 和相关期刊的手工搜索中进行广泛搜索,以找到所有相关研究论文。将由两名独立评审员进行论文选择、全文评估和数据提取。将分析和比较参与者对干预措施的反应以及实验设计,包括方法学挑战。结果可能突出报告和比较声音和机械振动方法的潜在差距,并促进更好地理解它们管理痴呆症症状的潜力。此外,LFV 和基于音乐的干预措施之间的可能关系将变得更加清晰。