• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《教练-运动员关系问卷(ArCART-Q)的直接和元版本在阿拉伯语中的验证:与运动员对个人表现的满意度的关系》

The Validation of Direct and Meta Versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (ArCART-Q) in the Arabic Language: Their Relationship to Athlete's Satisfaction with Individual Performance.

机构信息

The College of Basic Education, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Al Adiliya Area, Kuwait City 13092, Kuwait.

Faculty of Sport Sciences, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):1998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041998.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18041998
PMID:33669505
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7922148/
Abstract

: The first aim of this study is to achieve validation of the direct and meta-perspective versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire in the Arabic language, and the second aim of this study is to determine the quality of the coach-athlete relationship to athlete' satisfaction with individual performance according to sport participation type, sport duration, and sport achievement. : A total of 259 athletes with a mean age of 22 years were recruited from various athletic clubs in Kuwait. Participants completed The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire and The Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire. For this study, the factorial structure of the Arabic version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) was used in Kuwait and was prepared with both direct and meta perspectives. : The results of this study show evidence of the validity of the direct and meta-perspective Arabic versions of the CART-Q. The fit indices of the data collected by direct-method were as follows (x/df = 2.21; RMSEA = 0.06; CFI = 0.98; GFI = 0.95; AGFI = 0.91); data for the meta-method were as follows (x/df = 2.32; RMSEA = 0.08; CFI = 0.99; GFI = 0.93; AGFI = 0.87). Female participants have obtained higher means than males from all questionnaires. : The results of the present study could help coaches and athletes from the Middle East to understand the reasons and methods that lead to a quality coach-athlete relationship.

摘要

: 本研究的首要目的是在阿拉伯语中验证直接和元视角版本的《教练员-运动员关系问卷》的有效性,其次是根据运动参与类型、运动持续时间和运动成绩确定教练员-运动员关系的质量与运动员对个人表现的满意度。: 本研究共招募了 259 名年龄在 22 岁左右的科威特各体育俱乐部的运动员。参与者完成了《教练员-运动员关系问卷》和《运动员满意度问卷》。在本研究中,科威特使用了《教练员-运动员关系问卷》(CART-Q)阿拉伯语版本的因子结构,采用直接和元视角两种方式进行准备。: 本研究结果表明,直接和元视角的阿拉伯语 CART-Q 版本具有有效性证据。直接方法收集的数据拟合指数如下(x/df = 2.21;RMSEA = 0.06;CFI = 0.98;GFI = 0.95;AGFI = 0.91);元方法的数据如下(x/df = 2.32;RMSEA = 0.08;CFI = 0.99;GFI = 0.93;AGFI = 0.87)。所有问卷中,女性参与者的得分均高于男性参与者。: 本研究的结果可以帮助来自中东的教练和运动员了解导致优质教练员-运动员关系的原因和方法。

相似文献

1
The Validation of Direct and Meta Versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (ArCART-Q) in the Arabic Language: Their Relationship to Athlete's Satisfaction with Individual Performance.《教练-运动员关系问卷(ArCART-Q)的直接和元版本在阿拉伯语中的验证:与运动员对个人表现的满意度的关系》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):1998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041998.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire for Coaches and Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷马来语版对教练和运动员的心理测量特性
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;31(3):241-251. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.3.19. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Basic Psychological Needs and Sports Satisfaction Among Brazilian Athletes and Coaches: The Mediating Role of the Dyadic Relationship.巴西运动员和教练的基本心理需求与运动满意度:二元关系的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 12;10:2543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02543. eCollection 2019.
4
Coach-athlete attachment and the quality of the coach-athlete relationship: implications for athlete's well-being.教练与运动员的依恋关系及教练-运动员关系的质量:对运动员幸福感的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(15):1454-64. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.898183. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
What makes coaches tick? The impact of coaches' intrinsic and extrinsic motives on their own satisfaction and that of their athletes.教练的动力源自何处?教练的内在和外在动机对其自身满意度以及运动员满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Oct;18(5):664-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00705.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
6
Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q).教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q)的比利时教练版本的心理测量特性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20(5):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x.
7
The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation.教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q):编制与初步验证
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004 Aug;14(4):245-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x.
8
Effects of coaches' autonomy support on athletes' aggressive behavior and athlete burnout: verification of the mediating effects of coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy.教练自主支持对运动员攻击性行为和运动员倦怠的影响:教练-运动员关系和团队效能中介效应的验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1388185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388185. eCollection 2024.
9
Initial Validation of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire in a Sample of Portuguese Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷在葡萄牙运动员样本中的初步验证
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1360-1377. doi: 10.1177/00315125241254437. Epub 2024 May 17.
10
Communication Strategies: The Fuel for Quality Coach-Athlete Relationships and Athlete Satisfaction.沟通策略:优质教练-运动员关系及运动员满意度的助推器
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 24;10:2156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02156. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial Validation of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire in a Sample of Portuguese Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷在葡萄牙运动员样本中的初步验证
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1360-1377. doi: 10.1177/00315125241254437. Epub 2024 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication Strategies: The Fuel for Quality Coach-Athlete Relationships and Athlete Satisfaction.沟通策略:优质教练-运动员关系及运动员满意度的助推器
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 24;10:2156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02156. eCollection 2019.
2
Coaching effectiveness: the coach-athlete relationship at its heart.教练效能:核心在于教练与运动员的关系。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Aug;16:154-158. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 26.
3
Effects of big-five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach-athlete dyads.大五人格特质对中国教练-运动员二元组中关系质量和满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):568-80. doi: 10.1111/sms.12329. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
4
Coach-athlete attachment and the quality of the coach-athlete relationship: implications for athlete's well-being.教练与运动员的依恋关系及教练-运动员关系的质量:对运动员幸福感的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(15):1454-64. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.898183. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
An attachment theory perspective in the examination of relational processes associated with coach-athlete dyads.从依恋理论视角考察与教练-运动员对关系相关的过程。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013 Apr;35(2):156-67. doi: 10.1123/jsep.35.2.156.
6
Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q).教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q)的比利时教练版本的心理测量特性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20(5):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x.
7
The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation.教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q):编制与初步验证
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004 Aug;14(4):245-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x.