• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q)的比利时教练版本的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q).

机构信息

Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20(5):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x
PMID:19804577
Abstract

The study examined the psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). The questionnaire includes three dimensions (Closeness, Commitment, and Complementarity) in a model that intends to measure the quality of the coach-athlete relationship. Belgian coaches (n=144) of athletes who performed at various competition levels in such sports as football, basketball, and volleyball responded to the CART-Q and to the Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS). A confirmatory factor analysis proved to be slightly more satisfactory for a three-order factor model, compared with a hierarchical first-order factor model. The three factors showed acceptable internal consistency scores. Moreover, functional associations between the three factors and coach leadership behaviors were found offering support to the instrument's concurrent validity. The findings support previous validation studies and verify the psychometric properties of the CART-Q applied to Belgian coaches of team sports.

摘要

本研究考察了比利时教练版的《教练-运动员关系问卷》(CART-Q)的心理测量学特性。该问卷包含三个维度(亲近、承诺和互补),旨在测量教练-运动员关系的质量。在足球、篮球和排球等运动项目中,不同比赛水平的运动员的比利时教练(n=144)对 CART-Q 和运动领导力量表(LSS)进行了回应。与层次式一阶因子模型相比,三阶因子模型的验证性因子分析结果略为理想。三个因素显示出可接受的内部一致性得分。此外,还发现了三个因素与教练领导行为之间的功能关联,为该工具的同时效度提供了支持。研究结果支持了先前的验证研究,并验证了适用于比利时团队运动教练的 CART-Q 的心理测量学特性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q).教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q)的比利时教练版本的心理测量特性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20(5):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x.
2
The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation.教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q):编制与初步验证
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004 Aug;14(4):245-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x.
3
What makes coaches tick? The impact of coaches' intrinsic and extrinsic motives on their own satisfaction and that of their athletes.教练的动力源自何处?教练的内在和外在动机对其自身满意度以及运动员满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Oct;18(5):664-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00705.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
4
The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS-S): A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version.《运动教练行为量表(CBS-S):瑞典语版本的心理测量学评估》
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Jan;26(1):116-23. doi: 10.1111/sms.12359. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire for Coaches and Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷马来语版对教练和运动员的心理测量特性
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;31(3):241-251. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.3.19. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Initial Validation of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire in a Sample of Portuguese Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷在葡萄牙运动员样本中的初步验证
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1360-1377. doi: 10.1177/00315125241254437. Epub 2024 May 17.
7
Coaching competency and satisfaction with the coach: a multi-level structural equation model.教练能力和对教练的满意度:多层次结构方程模型。
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):411-22. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.538710.
8
[Psychometric evaluation of the Coach Orientation Questionnaire with a Spanish sample of handball coaches].[对手球教练的西班牙样本进行教练导向问卷的心理测量评估]
Psicothema. 2007 Nov;19(4):699-705.
9
Understanding sport-related drinking motives in college athletes: psychometric analyses of the Athlete Drinking Scale.了解大学生运动员与运动相关的饮酒动机:运动员饮酒量表的心理测量分析。
Addict Behav. 2008 Jul;33(7):974-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.03.001.
10
Effects of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on collective efficacy.教练领导风格和教练-运动员关系对集体效能的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Apr;24(2):454-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01527.x. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire for Coaches and Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷马来语版对教练和运动员的心理测量特性
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;31(3):241-251. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.3.19. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Initial Validation of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire in a Sample of Portuguese Athletes.教练-运动员关系问卷在葡萄牙运动员样本中的初步验证
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1360-1377. doi: 10.1177/00315125241254437. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
The Validation of Direct and Meta Versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (ArCART-Q) in the Arabic Language: Their Relationship to Athlete's Satisfaction with Individual Performance.
《教练-运动员关系问卷(ArCART-Q)的直接和元版本在阿拉伯语中的验证:与运动员对个人表现的满意度的关系》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):1998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041998.