• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护患者、家属与医护人员之间的信任:概念框架的构建及案例研究

Trust in Intensive Care Patients, Family, and Healthcare Professionals: The Development of a Conceptual Framework Followed by a Case Study.

作者信息

Lemmers Anne Lotte, van der Voort Peter H J

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, OLVG Hospital, P.O. Box 95500, 1090HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 15;9(2):208. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020208.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare9020208
PMID:33671940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7919028/
Abstract

Intensive care patients experience anxiety, pain, uncertainty, and total dependency. In general, it is important to develop trust between the healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and their family. Trust building in the ICU setting is challenging because of the time sensitivity of decision making and the dependency of patients on health care professionals. The objectives of this study are the development of a trust framework and then to use this framework in a case study in the intensive care. In three steps we developed a comprehensive trust framework from the literature concerning trust. First, we identified the elements of trust. Second, we adapted and integrated the dimensions to six concepts to construct the trust framework. Third, these concepts are incorporated into a comprehensive trust framework. In a case study we explored the facilitators and barriers within this framework in eight semi-open interviews with healthcare professionals and eight patients or partners. Trust was first explored inductively and then deductively. We showed that HCPs, patients, and family have largely the same perspective regarding the facilitators of trust, in which communication emerged as the most important one. Other facilitators are maintaining an open feedback culture for HCPs and being aware of patients' physical and informational privacy. Patients want to be approached as an individual with individual needs. Dishonesty and differences in values and norms were the most important barriers. To contribute to a positive perception of health delivery and to avoid conflicts between HCP and patients or their family we formulated five practical recommendations.

摘要

重症监护患者会经历焦虑、疼痛、不确定性和完全的依赖。一般来说,在医护人员、患者及其家属之间建立信任很重要。在重症监护环境中建立信任具有挑战性,因为决策具有时间敏感性,且患者依赖医护人员。本研究的目的是制定一个信任框架,然后在重症监护的案例研究中使用该框架。我们通过三个步骤从有关信任的文献中制定了一个全面的信任框架。首先,我们确定了信任的要素。其次,我们将这些维度调整并整合为六个概念以构建信任框架。第三,将这些概念纳入一个全面的信任框架。在一个案例研究中,我们通过对医护人员和八名患者或其家属进行八次半开放式访谈,探索了该框架内的促进因素和障碍。信任首先通过归纳法进行探索,然后通过演绎法进行探索。我们发现,医护人员、患者和家属在信任促进因素方面的看法基本相同,其中沟通是最重要的因素。其他促进因素包括为医护人员保持开放的反馈文化以及意识到患者的身体和信息隐私。患者希望被视为有个人需求的个体。不诚实以及价值观和规范的差异是最重要的障碍。为了促进对医疗服务的积极认知并避免医护人员与患者或其家属之间的冲突,我们提出了五条实用建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/86be2b6b4766/healthcare-09-00208-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/ee22dac006e0/healthcare-09-00208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/917bff6eaa7e/healthcare-09-00208-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/86be2b6b4766/healthcare-09-00208-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/ee22dac006e0/healthcare-09-00208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/917bff6eaa7e/healthcare-09-00208-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7e/7919028/86be2b6b4766/healthcare-09-00208-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in Intensive Care Patients, Family, and Healthcare Professionals: The Development of a Conceptual Framework Followed by a Case Study.重症监护患者、家属与医护人员之间的信任:概念框架的构建及案例研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 15;9(2):208. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020208.
2
Exploring Factors Affecting Health Care Providers' Behaviors for Maintaining Continuity of Care in Kerala, India; A Qualitative Analysis Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.探讨影响印度喀拉拉邦医疗保健提供者维持连续性护理行为的因素;使用理论领域框架的定性分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;10:891103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.891103. eCollection 2022.
3
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review.患者和医疗保健专业人员对衰弱和老年患者围手术期护理中共同决策的感知促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09120-4.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study.多学科坐骨神经痛治疗中实施共享决策的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 23;8:95. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-95.
5
Healthcare Providers' Impact on the Care Experiences of Patients with Endometriosis: The Value of Trust.医疗保健提供者对子宫内膜异位症患者护理体验的影响:信任的价值。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(10):1981-1993. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2048468. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Healthcare professionals' perceptions on barriers and facilitators to DMARD use in rheumatoid arthritis.医疗保健专业人员对类风湿关节炎中 DMARD 使用的障碍和促进因素的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07459-0.
7
eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients' and Health Care Providers' Use of Health-Related Internet Information.电子健康、参与式医疗与伦理关怀:一项关于患者及医疗服务提供者对健康相关互联网信息使用情况的焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e155. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3792.
8
Disentangling trust of patients with rare cancer in their healthcare professionals and the healthcare system: a qualitative interview study.剖析罕见癌症患者对其医疗保健专业人员及医疗保健系统的信任:一项定性访谈研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun;19(3):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01531-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
9
Shared communication processes within healthcare teams for rare diseases and their influence on healthcare professionals' innovative behavior and patient satisfaction.医疗团队内部在罕见病方面的沟通流程及其对医疗专业人员创新行为和患者满意度的影响。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 21;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-40.
10
They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.他们受到了伤害:关于机构和医疗服务提供者背叛的报告,以及与埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征患者当前症状、未满足的需求和医疗期望的关联。
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021 Jun 14;2:26330040211022033. doi: 10.1177/26330040211022033. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
In Defence of Causing Patients to Worry: Ethical Issues in the Communication of Diagnostic Uncertainty.为引发患者担忧辩护:诊断不确定性沟通中的伦理问题
Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):700-708. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13436. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: 'Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged … '.患者对重症监护病房物理治疗的看法:“你的身体需要去一个地方恢复能量……”
South Afr J Crit Care. 2023 Dec 13;39(3):e1092. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2023.v39i3.1092. eCollection 2023.
3
Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving healthcare service quality through performance management.通过绩效管理提高医疗服务质量。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2019 Jun 28;32(3):477-492. doi: 10.1108/LHS-02-2019-0006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
The impact of patient-physician alliance on trust following an adverse event.医患联盟对不良事件后信任的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jul;102(7):1342-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
A Framework for Increasing Trust Between Patients and the Organizations That Care for Them.
概念化、衡量信任、不信任和怀疑:对推进健康公平和建立值得信赖关系的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):465-484. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-061022-044737. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
Exploring the Relationship Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Trust in Physicians from Spousal and Parent-Child Perspectives.从配偶和亲子角度探讨不确定性不耐受与对医生信任之间的关系。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jun 13;16:2173-2186. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S413821. eCollection 2023.
5
Disparities in Unilateral Do Not Resuscitate Order Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠肺炎大流行期间单侧不复苏医嘱使用的差异。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;51(8):1012-1022. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005863. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Improve Communicating Uncertainty in Intensive Care Unit With Patient and Family (ICU-PF).改善重症监护病房中患者及家属对不确定性的认知(ICU-PF)。
Cureus. 2021 Dec 30;13(12):e20837. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20837. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Six-Month Outcomes in COVID-19 ICU Patients and Their Family Members: A Prospective Cohort Study.新冠重症监护病房患者及其家属的六个月结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 8;9(7):865. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070865.
增强患者与护理他们的组织之间信任的框架。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):539-540. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19186.
4
The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting.在初级保健环境中,以患者为中心的护理和护理共同创造对于满足多病症患者的护理满意度以及身体和社会幸福感的重要性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y.
5
Trust in times of health reform.健康改革时期的信任
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Identifying improvement opportunities for patient- and family-centered care in the ICU: Using qualitative methods to understand family perspectives.识别 ICU 中以患者和家庭为中心的护理的改进机会:使用定性方法了解家庭观点。
J Crit Care. 2019 Feb;49:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
7
Reducing the Stress on Clinicians Working in the ICU.减轻重症监护病房临床医生的工作压力。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):1981-1982. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14285.
8
The status of ethics in Swedish health care management: a qualitative study.瑞典医疗保健管理中的伦理状况:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3436-8.
9
About Politeness, Face, and Feedback: Exploring Resident and Faculty Perceptions of How Institutional Feedback Culture Influences Feedback Practices.关于礼貌、面子和反馈:探究住院医师和教师对机构反馈文化如何影响反馈实践的看法。
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1348-1358. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002193.
10
Cultural competence in healthcare in the community: A concept analysis.社区医疗保健中的文化能力:一项概念分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):590-603. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12556. Epub 2018 Mar 7.