Department of Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta, GA 30354, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 23;18(4):2194. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042194.
The impact of individuals' mobility on the degree of error in estimates of exposure to ambient PM2.5 concentrations is increasingly reported in the literature. However, the degree to which accounting for mobility reduces error likely varies as a function of two related factors-individuals' routine travel patterns and the local variations of air pollution fields. We investigated whether individuals' routine travel patterns moderate the impact of mobility on individual long-term exposure assessment. Here, we have used real-world time-activity data collected from 2013 participants in Erie/Niagara counties, New York, USA, matched with daily PM2.5 predictions obtained from two spatial exposure models. We further examined the role of the spatiotemporal representation of ambient PM2.5 as a second moderator in the relationship between an individual's mobility and the exposure measurement error using a random effect model. We found that the effect of mobility on the long-term exposure estimates was significant, but that this effect was modified by individuals' routine travel patterns. Further, this effect modification was pronounced when the local variations of ambient PM2.5 concentrations were captured from multiple sources of air pollution data ('a multi-sourced exposure model'). In contrast, the mobility effect and its modification were not detected when ambient PM2.5 concentration was estimated solely from sparse monitoring data ('a single-sourced exposure model'). This study showed that there was a significant association between individuals' mobility and the long-term exposure measurement error. However, the effect could be modified by individuals' routine travel patterns and the error-prone representation of spatiotemporal variability of PM2.5.
个体流动性对环境 PM2.5 浓度暴露估计误差程度的影响在文献中越来越多地被报道。然而,考虑到流动性可以减少多少误差可能因两个相关因素而有所不同——个体的日常出行模式和空气污染场的局部变化。我们调查了个体的日常出行模式是否会影响流动性对个体长期暴露评估的影响。在这里,我们使用了从美国纽约州伊利/尼亚加拉县 2013 名参与者收集的真实世界的时间活动数据,并与从两个空间暴露模型获得的每日 PM2.5 预测进行了匹配。我们进一步使用随机效应模型,检查了环境 PM2.5 的时空表示作为个体流动性和暴露测量误差之间关系的第二个调节剂的作用。我们发现,流动性对长期暴露估计的影响是显著的,但这种影响受到个体日常出行模式的修饰。进一步,当从多个空气污染数据来源捕获环境 PM2.5 浓度的局部变化时,这种效应修饰更为明显(“多源暴露模型”)。相比之下,当仅从稀疏监测数据估计环境 PM2.5 浓度时(“单源暴露模型”),流动性效应及其修饰都未被检测到。本研究表明,个体流动性与长期暴露测量误差之间存在显著关联。然而,这种影响可以通过个体的日常出行模式和 PM2.5 的时空可变性的易错表示来修饰。