Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 23;18(4):2199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042199.
The prevailing sex education (SE) model falls within a neoliberal prevention- and risk-oriented paradigm. This model ignores the identity dimension of sexuality, is based on the cis-heteronormative and ethnocentric matrix and stigmatizes sexual and cultural diversity; this has significant consequences for sexually and culturally diverse adolescents and youth. In this study, we explored the potential of the identity dimension of SE to prevent violence toward sexual and cultural diversity. Specifically, our objective was to identify the influence of heteronormative and ethnocentric variables on violence exerted against trans* and gender-diverse people and people from minority ethnic groups.
A total of 623 Spanish adolescents with a mean age of 14.73 years and an age range of 13 to 18 years participated in the study. Students completed a questionnaire that included measures regarding violence toward sexual and cultural diversity, gender stereotypes, sexist attitudes and rejection of sexual and cultural diversity. We performed two hierarchical linear regression models.
Students who exerted the highest amount of violence toward trans* and gender-diverse people were those who showed the lowest endorsement of expressive traits and the highest endorsement of instrumental traits as well as the highest level of hostile sexist, heteronormative and hostile racist attitudes (the five predictor variables explained 29.1% of the variance of gender-bashing). These same variables-except expressiveness-and benevolent sexism explained 46.1% of the variance of rejection of minority ethnic groups.
There is a need for a comprehensive, intercultural, critical and queer SE aimed at transforming the classroom into a space that promotes social transformation through an educational practice that is transgressive and critical of cis-heteronormativity and normative ethnocentrism.
当前的性教育(SE)模式属于新自由主义的预防和风险导向范式。这种模式忽略了性的身份维度,基于顺性别和异性恋规范以及种族中心主义,污名化了性和文化多样性;这对性和文化多样化的青少年和青年产生了重大影响。在这项研究中,我们探讨了 SE 的身份维度在预防针对性和文化多样性的暴力方面的潜力。具体来说,我们的目标是确定性别规范和种族中心变量对跨性别和性别多样化的人以及少数族裔群体的暴力行为的影响。
共有 623 名西班牙青少年参与了这项研究,他们的平均年龄为 14.73 岁,年龄范围为 13 至 18 岁。学生们完成了一份问卷,其中包括针对针对性和文化多样性、性别刻板印象、性别歧视态度和对性和文化多样性的排斥的测量。我们进行了两个层次线性回归模型。
对跨性别和性别多样化的人施加最高程度暴力的学生是那些表现出最低表达特质和最高工具特质、最高程度敌对性别歧视、性别规范和敌对种族主义态度的学生(五个预测变量解释了 29.1%的性别攻击差异)。除了表达力和仁慈的性别歧视外,这些相同的变量解释了对少数民族排斥的 46.1%的差异。
需要进行全面、跨文化、批判性和酷儿的 SE,旨在通过具有挑战性和批判性的教育实践,将课堂转变为促进社会变革的空间,这种实践反对顺性别和异性恋规范以及规范的种族中心主义。