Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Division of Adolescent and School Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jun;68(6):1040-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
To synthesize the diverse body of literature on sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) and sexual health education.
We conducted a systematic search of the literature on SGMY and sexual health education, including SGMY perspectives on sexual health education, the acceptability or effectiveness of programs designed for SGMY, and SGMY-specific results of sexual health education programs delivered to general youth populations.
A total of 32 articles were included. Sixteen qualitative studies with SGMY highlight key perspectives underscoring how youth gained inadequate knowledge from sexual health education experiences and received content that excluded their identities and behaviors. Thirteen studies examined the acceptability or effectiveness of sexual health interventions designed for SGMY from which key characteristics of inclusive sexual health education relating to development, content, and delivery emerged. One study found a sexual health education program delivered to a general population of youth was also acceptable for a subsample of sexual minority girls.
Future research on SGMY experiences should incorporate populations understudied, including younger adolescents, sexual minority girls, and transgender persons. Further, the effectiveness of inclusive sexual health education in general population settings requires further study.
综合有关性少数群体青年(SGMY)和性健康教育的多种文献。
我们对 SGMY 和性健康教育的文献进行了系统检索,包括 SGMY 对性健康教育的看法、为 SGMY 设计的项目的可接受性或有效性,以及向普通青年群体提供的性健康教育项目的 SGMY 特异性结果。
共纳入 32 篇文章。16 项针对 SGMY 的定性研究强调了青年从性健康教育经历中获得的知识不足以及接受的内容排除了他们的身份和行为的关键观点。13 项研究检查了专为 SGMY 设计的性健康干预措施的可接受性或有效性,从中出现了与发展、内容和传递相关的包容性性健康教育的关键特征。一项研究发现,向一般青年群体提供的性健康教育计划也可接受性少数群体女孩的亚组。
未来有关 SGMY 经验的研究应纳入研究不足的人群,包括较年轻的青少年、性少数群体女孩和跨性别者。此外,包容性性健康教育在一般人群中的有效性需要进一步研究。