Department of Geography, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, Pakistan.
Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, CH-8001 Zürich, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 27;18(5):2336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052336.
The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China in late December 2019 became the harbinger of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, geospatial techniques, such as modeling and mapping, have helped in disease pattern detection. Here we provide a synthesis of the techniques and associated findings in relation to COVID-19 and its geographic, environmental, and socio-demographic characteristics, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology for scoping reviews. We searched PubMed for relevant articles and discussed the results separately for three categories: disease mapping, exposure mapping, and spatial epidemiological modeling. The majority of studies were ecological in nature and primarily carried out in China, Brazil, and the USA. The most common spatial methods used were clustering, hotspot analysis, space-time scan statistic, and regression modeling. Researchers used a wide range of spatial and statistical software to apply spatial analysis for the purpose of disease mapping, exposure mapping, and epidemiological modeling. Factors limiting the use of these spatial techniques were the unavailability and bias of COVID-19 data-along with scarcity of fine-scaled demographic, environmental, and socio-economic data-which restrained most of the researchers from exploring causal relationships of potential influencing factors of COVID-19. Our review identified geospatial analysis in COVID-19 research and highlighted current trends and research gaps. Since most of the studies found centered on Asia and the Americas, there is a need for more comparable spatial studies using geographically fine-scaled data in other areas of the world.
2019 年 12 月下旬,中国武汉爆发的 SARS-CoV-2 疫情成为 COVID-19 大流行的先兆。在大流行期间,地理空间技术,如建模和制图,有助于发现疾病模式。在这里,我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)方法进行范围审查,综合了与 COVID-19 及其地理、环境和社会人口学特征相关的技术和相关发现。我们在 PubMed 上搜索了相关文章,并分别讨论了三类结果:疾病制图、暴露制图和空间流行病学建模。大多数研究的性质是生态学的,主要在中国、巴西和美国进行。最常用的空间方法是聚类、热点分析、时空扫描统计和回归建模。研究人员使用广泛的空间和统计软件来应用空间分析,以进行疾病制图、暴露制图和流行病学建模。这些空间技术的使用受到限制,原因是 COVID-19 数据的可用性和偏差以及缺乏细粒度的人口、环境和社会经济数据,这限制了大多数研究人员探索 COVID-19 潜在影响因素的因果关系。我们的综述确定了 COVID-19 研究中的地理空间分析,并强调了当前的趋势和研究差距。由于大多数研究都集中在亚洲和美洲,因此需要在世界其他地区使用地理上细粒度的数据进行更多可比的空间研究。