Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;259(9):2521-2531. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05113-3. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
To introduce an ETDRS grid-based classification for macula involving retinal detachment (MIRD) with or without center (foveal) involvement and to identify biomarkers in preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) associated with a favorable postoperative functional outcome in eyes with center involving retinal detachment (CIRD). One hundred and two eyes of 102 consecutive patients (f/m: 35/67) with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, preoperative evidence of MIRD (perifoveal involvement of ≤ 6.0 mm), and successful retinal surgery were included in this retrospective cohort study. Eyes were assigned to 5 grades of MIRD (G1-G5), based on the extent of detachment in the ETDRS grid. Eyes with a detached foveal status (CIRD) were assigned to G4 or G5. In CIRD, the following OCT biomarkers were quantified and correlated with mean BCVA (logMAR) at 3 months postsurgery, using univariate and multivariable regression models: grade of detachment, extent of intraretinal edema, height of foveal detachment, subretinal folds, and epiretinal membrane. Forty-one of 102 eyes (40.2%) presented with an attached foveal status, defined as either outer (G1: 11.8%) or inner (G2: 18.6%) macular involvement or fovea-threatening MIRD (G3: 9.8%). Sixty-one eyes (59.8%) showed CIRD (G4 or G5). Eyes with CIRD had significantly worse postoperative BCVA than eyes without foveal involvement (0.355 logMAR vs. 0.138 logMAR, p<0.001). If CIRD was limited to three outer ETDRS quadrants (G4), mean BCVA was better compared to CIRD involving all four ETDRS quadrants (G5) (0.254 logMAR vs. 0.522 logMAR, p<0.001). Reading ability (BCVA ≤ 0.4 logMAR) was restored in 97.6% of eyes with G1-G3 compared to 86.9% of eyes with G4 (p=0.072) and 52.4% of eyes with G5 (p<0.001). In multivariable regression analysis of eyes with CIRD, a lower grade of detachment (G4 vs. G5: p<0.05) and lower extent of cystoid edema (focal/none vs. wide: p<0.001) were both associated with better postoperative function. The functional outcome after MIRD may be worse in the presence of foveal involvement (CIRD), but a lower grade of detachment and the absence of intraretinal edema can predict a good recovery in spite of CIRD.
引入一种基于 ETDRS 网格的黄斑脱离(MIRD)分类方法,涉及视网膜脱离(MIRD)伴或不伴有中心(黄斑中心凹)受累,并确定术前光学相干断层扫描(OCT)中的生物标志物与中心受累性视网膜脱离(CIRD)患者术后功能结局的有利相关。本回顾性队列研究纳入了 102 例连续患者(f/m:35/67)的 102 只眼,这些患者患有原发性孔源性视网膜脱离,术前存在 MIRD 证据(旁中心累及≤6.0mm),并成功进行了视网膜手术。根据 ETDRS 网格中脱离的范围,将眼分为 5 级 MIRD(G1-G5)。有脱离黄斑状态(CIRD)的眼被分配到 G4 或 G5。在 CIRD 中,使用单变量和多变量回归模型,对以下 OCT 生物标志物进行量化,并与术后 3 个月的平均 BCVA(logMAR)相关联:脱离程度、视网膜内水肿程度、黄斑脱离高度、视网膜下皱褶和视网膜内膜。102 只眼中有 41 只(40.2%)呈现出附着的黄斑状态,定义为外(G1:11.8%)或内(G2:18.6%)黄斑受累或黄斑威胁性 MIRD(G3:9.8%)。61 只眼(59.8%)表现为 CIRD(G4 或 G5)。与无黄斑受累的眼相比,CIRD 眼的术后 BCVA 明显更差(0.355 logMAR 与 0.138 logMAR,p<0.001)。如果 CIRD 仅限于三个外 ETDRS 象限(G4),则与涉及所有四个 ETDRS 象限(G5)的 CIRD 相比,平均 BCVA 更好(0.254 logMAR 与 0.522 logMAR,p<0.001)。与 G4 组(p=0.072)和 G5 组(p<0.001)相比,G1-G3 组中有 97.6%的眼恢复了阅读能力(BCVA≤0.4 logMAR),而 G4 组中有 86.9%的眼和 G5 组中有 52.4%的眼。在 CIRD 眼的多变量回归分析中,较低的脱离分级(G4 与 G5:p<0.05)和较低的囊样水肿程度(局灶性/无 vs. 广泛:p<0.001)均与术后功能恢复较好相关。在存在黄斑受累(CIRD)的情况下,MIRD 后的功能结果可能更差,但较低的脱离分级和无视网膜内水肿可预测即使存在 CIRD 也能很好地恢复。