AP-HP.Centre-Université de Paris, DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie, Paris, France; Inserm, UMS011, Population-based Epidemiological Cohorts, Villejuif, France.
Université de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, Département de Médecine Générale, Paris, France; Inserm, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR 1153, METHODS Team, Paris, France.
J Psychosom Res. 2021 May;144:110410. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110410. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Cognitive empathy might decrease during medical school. Factors associated with its evolution remain poorly understood, as well as whether such factors could moderate the effect of an intervention to preserve cognitive empathy. The aim was to explore the associations between personality traits and both cognitive empathy at baseline and its changes at follow-up. The possible effect of an intervention depended upon personality traits was also examined.
The cohort consisted of fourth year medical students and the associations between personality traits, using the Short Big Five Inventory, and cognitive empathy changes at 3-month, using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student version (JSE-S), were examined. A randomization in two groups (Balint groups versus no intervention) allowed examining whether the effect of the intervention depended upon personality traits. Linear regressions were adjusted for gender, anticipated specialty choice, parental education, living status, financial insecurity, randomization group and baseline JSE-S.
The cohort included 311 participants from October 2015 to December 2016 at Paris Diderot and Paris Descartes University. At follow-up, there was a JSE-S total score increase of 1.22(SD:9.10) in the intervention group, compared to a decrease of 1.64(SD:10.74) in the other group. Baseline JSE-S was positively associated with Extraversion and Conscientiousness and negatively with Neuroticism. In contrast, we found no associations between baseline personality traits and JSE-S change. There were no interactions between personality traits and randomization group.
Although personality might be linked with cognitive empathy, medical students may benefit from strategies designed for improving cognitive empathy regardless of their personality.
认知同理心可能会在医学院学习期间下降。与认知同理心演变相关的因素仍知之甚少,也不清楚这些因素是否可以调节保护认知同理心的干预措施的效果。本研究旨在探讨人格特质与基线时认知同理心及其随访时变化之间的关系。还检查了干预效果是否取决于人格特质。
该队列由四年级医学生组成,使用短式大五人格量表(Short Big Five Inventory)评估人格特质,使用杰斐逊同理心量表学生版(Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student version,JSE-S)评估认知同理心在 3 个月时的变化。随机分为两组(巴林特小组与无干预组),可以检验干预效果是否取决于人格特质。线性回归调整了性别、预期专业选择、父母教育程度、居住状态、经济不安全感、随机分组和基线 JSE-S。
2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 12 月,在巴黎狄德罗大学和巴黎笛卡尔大学共纳入 311 名参与者。在随访时,干预组的 JSE-S 总分增加了 1.22(SD:9.10),而对照组则减少了 1.64(SD:10.74)。基线 JSE-S 与外向性和尽责性呈正相关,与神经质呈负相关。相反,我们发现基线人格特质与 JSE-S 变化之间没有关联。人格特质与随机分组之间没有交互作用。
尽管人格可能与认知同理心有关,但无论其人格如何,医学生可能都受益于旨在提高认知同理心的策略。