• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于淋病预防的抗菌漱口液(OMEGA):一项随机、双盲、平行分组、多中心试验。

Antiseptic mouthwash for gonorrhoea prevention (OMEGA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial.

机构信息

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):647-656. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30704-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30704-0
PMID:33676595
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To address the increasing incidence of gonorrhoea and antimicrobial resistance, we compared the efficacy of Listerine and Biotène mouthwashes for preventing gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men (MSM).

METHODS

The OMEGA trial was a multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind randomised controlled trial among MSM, done at three urban sexual health clinics and one general practice clinic in Australia. Men were eligible if they were diagnosed with oropharyngeal gonorrhoea by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) in the previous 30 days or were aged 16-24 years. They were randomly assigned to receive Listerine (intervention) or Biotène (control) via a computer-generated sequence (1:1 ratio, block size of four). Participants, clinicians, data collectors, data analysts, and outcome adjudicators were masked to the interventions after assignment. Participants were instructed to rinse and gargle with 20 mL of mouthwash for 60 s at least once daily for 12 weeks. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected by research nurses every 6 weeks, and participants provided saliva samples every 3 weeks, to be tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae with NAAT and quantitative PCR. The primary outcome was proportion of MSM diagnosed with oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae infection at any point over the 12-week period, defined as a positive result for either oropharyngeal swabs or saliva samples by NAAT, and the cumulative incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea at the week 12 visit. A modified intention-to-treat analysis for the primary outcome was done that included men who provided at least one follow-up specimen over the 12-week study period. The trial was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000247471).

FINDINGS

Between March 30, 2016, and Oct 26, 2018, 786 MSM were screened and 256 were excluded. 264 MSM were randomly assigned to the Biotène group and 266 to the Listerine group. The analysis population included 227 (86%) men in the Biotène group and 219 (82%) in the Listerine group. Oropharyngeal gonorrhoea was detected in ten (4%) of 227 of MSM in the Biotène group and in 15 (7%) of 219 in the Listerine group (adjusted risk difference 2·5%, 95% CI -1·8 to 6·8). The cumulative incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea at the week 12 visit did not differ between the two mouthwash groups (adjusted risk difference 3·1%, 95% CI -1·4 to 7·7).

INTERPRETATION

Listerine did not reduce the incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea compared with Biotène. However, previous research suggests that mouthwash might reduce the infectivity of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea; therefore, further studies of mouthwash examining its inhibitory effect on N gonorrhoeae are warranted to determine if it has a potential role for the prevention of transmission.

FUNDING

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

摘要

背景

为应对淋病发病率上升和抗菌药物耐药问题,我们比较了李施德林和比基尼(Biotène)漱口水对男男性行为者(MSM)预防淋病的效果。

方法

OMEGA 试验是一项在澳大利亚 3 家城市性健康诊所和 1 家普通诊所进行的多中心、平行组、双盲随机对照试验,纳入对象为过去 30 天内经核酸扩增试验(NAAT)诊断为咽淋病或年龄在 16-24 岁的 MSM。采用计算机生成的序列(1:1 比例,区组大小为 4)将他们随机分为李施德林(干预)或比基尼(对照)组。参与者、临床医生、数据收集者、数据分析师和结局评估者在分组后对干预措施进行盲法。参与者被指示每天至少用 20 毫升漱口水漱口 60 秒,持续 12 周。研究护士每 6 周采集咽拭子,参与者每 3 周采集唾液样本,通过 NAAT 和定量 PCR 检测淋病奈瑟菌。主要结局为 12 周期间任何时间 MSM 诊断为咽淋病的比例,定义为咽拭子或唾液样本的 NAAT 检测均为阳性,以及第 12 周就诊时咽淋病的累积发病率。对主要结局进行了改良意向治疗分析,纳入至少在 12 周研究期间提供了一次随访标本的男性。该试验在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12616000247471)注册。

结果

2016 年 3 月 30 日至 2018 年 10 月 26 日,共筛选了 786 名 MSM,其中 256 名被排除。264 名 MSM 被随机分配至比基尼组,266 名分配至李施德林组。分析人群包括比基尼组 227 名(86%)和李施德林组 219 名(82%)男性。比基尼组 10 名(4%)和李施德林组 15 名(7%)男性(调整风险差 2·5%,95%CI-1·8 至 6·8)检测出咽淋病。两组在第 12 周就诊时的咽淋病累积发病率无差异(调整风险差 3·1%,95%CI-1·4 至 7·7)。

解释

与比基尼组相比,李施德林并未降低咽淋病发病率。然而,先前的研究表明,漱口水可能会降低淋病奈瑟菌的传染性;因此,需要进一步研究漱口水对淋病奈瑟菌的抑制作用,以确定其在预防传播方面是否具有潜在作用。

资金

澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会。

相似文献

1
Antiseptic mouthwash for gonorrhoea prevention (OMEGA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial.用于淋病预防的抗菌漱口液(OMEGA):一项随机、双盲、平行分组、多中心试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):647-656. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30704-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
A multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of daily use of antibacterial mouthwash against oropharyngeal gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men: the OMEGA (Oral Mouthwash use to Eradicate GonorrhoeA) study protocol.一项多中心双盲随机对照试验,评估每日使用抗菌漱口水对男男性行为者口咽淋病的疗效:OMEGA(使用口腔漱口水根除淋病)研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2541-3.
3
The Impact of Mouthwash on the Oropharyngeal Microbiota of Men Who Have Sex with Men: a Substudy of the OMEGA Trial.漱口水对男男性行为者口咽微生物群的影响:OMEGA 试验的子研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0175721. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01757-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Antiseptic mouthwash against pharyngeal : a randomised controlled trial and an in vitro study.用于咽部的抗菌漱口水:一项随机对照试验和一项体外研究。
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Mar;93(2):88-93. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052753. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
5
An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of antiseptic mouthwash versus antibiotics for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment (OMEGA2).一项针对口腔淋病治疗的含漱剂与抗生素(OMEGA2)的开放性、平行组、随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 9;10(1):19386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76184-1.
6
Adherence to, and acceptability of, Listerine mouthwash as a potential preventive intervention for pharyngeal gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men in Australia: a longitudinal study.澳大利亚男男性行为者中,利斯特林漱口水作为咽部淋病潜在预防干预措施的依从性和可接受性:一项纵向研究。
Sex Health. 2016 Oct;13(5):494-496. doi: 10.1071/SH16026.
7
The effect of daily usage of Listerine Cool Mint mouthwash on the oropharyngeal microbiome: a substudy of the PReGo trial.使用李施德林清凉薄荷漱口水对口咽微生物组的影响:PReGo 试验的子研究。
J Med Microbiol. 2024 Jun;73(6). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001830.
8
Antibacterial mouthwash to prevent sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PReGo): a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.使用抗菌漱口水预防男男性行为者中接受 HIV 暴露前预防(PReGo)的人发生性传播感染:一项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):657-667. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30778-7. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Neisseria gonorrhoeae Transmission Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: An Anatomical Site-Specific Mathematical Model Evaluating the Potential Preventive Impact of Mouthwash.淋病奈瑟菌在男男性行为者中的传播:评估漱口液潜在预防效果的基于解剖部位的数学模型。
Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Oct;44(10):586-592. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000661.
10
Potential effect of antiseptic mouthwash on the incidence of among men who have sex with men: a mathematical modelling study.含漱剂对男男性行为人群中 发生率影响的潜在作用:一项数学建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052823.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationale and Ethical Assessment of an Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea Controlled Human Infection Model.口咽淋病受控人体感染模型的原理与伦理评估
J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 15;231(4):841-848. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf029.
2
The incubation for urethral gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men with and without oropharyngeal gonorrhoea.男性尿道淋病的潜伏期,包括有和无咽淋病的男男性行为者。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Sep 27;152:e104. doi: 10.1017/S095026882400089X.
3
Acceptability of Doxycycline Prophylaxis, Prior Antibiotic Use, and Knowledge of Antimicrobial Resistance Among Australian Gay and Bisexual Men and Nonbinary People.
澳大利亚男同性恋者、双性恋者和非二元性别者中多西环素预防的可接受性、既往抗生素使用情况及抗菌药物耐药性知识
Sex Transm Dis. 2025 Feb 1;52(2):73-80. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002079. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
4
Behind Prep Decisions: Understanding User Patterns and Discontinuation Factors in Real-World.准备决策背后的原因:理解真实世界中用户模式和中断因素。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Sep;28(9):2979-2989. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04383-2. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
5
Understanding Risk Factors for Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea Among Sex Workers Attending Sexual Health Clinics in 2 Australian Cities: Mixed Methods Study.了解在澳大利亚两个城市的性健康诊所就诊的性工作者中口咽淋病的风险因素:混合方法研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 20;10:e46845. doi: 10.2196/46845.
6
High-Risk Sexual Activities and Condom Use Patterns During Group Sex Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Melbourne, Australia.在澳大利亚墨尔本,男男性行为者群体性行为中的高危性行为和避孕套使用模式。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2023 Aug 15;93(5):356-363. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003211.
7
The Discovery of Oropharyngeal Microbiota with Inhibitory Activity against Pathogenic and : An In Vitro Study of Clinical Isolates.具有抗致病活性的口咽微生物群的发现及:临床分离株的体外研究
Microorganisms. 2022 Dec 16;10(12):2497. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122497.
8
Non-conventional interventions to prevent gonorrhea or syphilis among men who have sex with men: A scoping review.预防男男性行为者淋病或梅毒的非常规干预措施:一项范围综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 20;9:952476. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.952476. eCollection 2022.
9
Inhibitory Activity of Antibacterial Mouthwashes and Antiseptic Substances against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.抗菌漱口水和防腐物质对淋病奈瑟菌的抑制活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jun 21;66(6):e0004222. doi: 10.1128/aac.00042-22. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
The SARS-CoV2 envelope differs from host cells, exposes procoagulant lipids, and is disrupted in vivo by oral rinses.SARS-CoV2 的包膜与宿主细胞不同,暴露促凝脂质,并在体内被口腔冲洗所破坏。
J Lipid Res. 2022 Jun;63(6):100208. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100208. Epub 2022 Apr 15.