Nuffield Dept of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Dept of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, UK; Dept of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.
Cortex. 2021 May;138:24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Human decisions are susceptible to biases, but establishing causal roles of brain areas has proved to be difficult. Here we studied decision biases in 17 people with unilateral medial prefrontal cortex damage and a rare patient with bilateral ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) lesions. Participants learned to choose which of two options was most likely to win, and then bet money on the outcome. Thus, good performance required not only selecting the best option, but also the amount to bet. Healthy people were biased by their previous bet, as well as by the unchosen option's value. Unilateral medial prefrontal lesions reduced these biases, leading to more rational decisions. Bilateral vmPFC lesions resulted in more strategic betting, again with less bias from the previous trial, paradoxically improving performance overall. Together, the results suggest that vmPFC normally imposes contextual biases, which in healthy people may actually be suboptimal in some situations.
人类的决策容易受到偏见的影响,但证明确定大脑区域的因果作用具有一定难度。在这里,我们研究了 17 名单侧内侧前额叶皮质损伤患者和一名罕见的双侧腹内侧前额皮质(vmPFC)损伤患者的决策偏差。参与者需要学习选择两个选项中最有可能获胜的选项,然后根据结果下注。因此,良好的表现不仅需要选择最佳选项,还需要确定下注的金额。健康人会受到之前下注和未选中选项价值的影响而产生偏见。单侧内侧前额叶损伤减少了这些偏见,导致更理性的决策。双侧 vmPFC 损伤导致更具策略性的下注,而且之前试验的偏见更小,令人费解的是,整体表现得到了提高。总之,结果表明 vmPFC 通常会产生情境偏见,而在某些情况下,这种偏见在健康人群中实际上可能并不理想。