Sperry Sarah H, Kwapil Thomas R
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Behav Sleep Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;20(1):90-99. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2021.1890076. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Although sleep disturbances are well documented in bipolar spectrum disorders (BSDs), significantly less research has examined whether these disturbances are present in those at risk for developing BSDs or with subsyndromal symptoms. The present study examined associations between risk for BSDs, as measured by the Hypomanic Personality Scale (HPS), and sleep assessed using experience sampling. We assessed whether intraindividual variability in sleep was associated with affect, cognition, and behavior in daily life and potential directionality of these relationships.
233 young adults oversampled for high scores on the HPS completed 14 days of experience sampling assessing total sleep time (TST), bed/rise time, sleep quality, affect (negative and positive affect), cognition (difficulty concentrating, racing thoughts), and behavior (impulsivity) in daily life. We used Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling (DSEM) to assess within-person links between sleep and bipolar spectrum psychopathology.
HPS scores were associated with less TST, later bedtime, and more variable TST and bedtime. Variability in TST was associated with negative affect, difficulty concentrating/racing thoughts, and impulsivity. Within-person decreases in sleep were associated with next day increases in negative affect, stress, difficulty concentrating, and racing thoughts.
Measurement of sleep was limited. Future studies should examine both objective measures of sleep (e.g., actigraphy) and fragmentation in sleep.
Risk for BSD was associated with similar patterns of sleep disruptions as seen in BSDs. Important dynamic links between sleep and bipolar spectrum psychopathology emerged indicating that sleep is an important target for improving symptoms of BSDs in daily life.
尽管双相谱系障碍(BSD)中的睡眠障碍已有充分记录,但对于这些障碍是否存在于有患BSD风险或有亚综合征症状的人群中的研究要少得多。本研究通过轻躁狂人格量表(HPS)测量了BSD风险与使用经验抽样法评估的睡眠之间的关联。我们评估了睡眠的个体内变异性是否与日常生活中的情感、认知和行为相关,以及这些关系的潜在方向性。
233名在HPS上得分较高的年轻成年人完成了为期14天的经验抽样,评估了总睡眠时间(TST)、上床/起床时间、睡眠质量、情感(消极和积极情感)、认知(注意力不集中、思维奔逸)和日常生活中的行为(冲动性)。我们使用动态结构方程模型(DSEM)来评估睡眠与双相谱系精神病理学之间的个体内联系。
HPS得分与较短的TST、较晚的就寝时间以及TST和就寝时间的更大变异性相关。TST的变异性与消极情感、注意力不集中/思维奔逸以及冲动性相关。个体内睡眠减少与次日消极情感、压力、注意力不集中和思维奔逸的增加相关。
睡眠测量有限。未来的研究应同时检查睡眠的客观测量方法(如活动记录仪)和睡眠碎片化情况。
BSD风险与BSD中观察到的类似睡眠中断模式相关。睡眠与双相谱系精神病理学之间出现了重要的动态联系,表明睡眠是改善日常生活中BSD症状的重要靶点。