Noh Kyoung Jin, Baik Hyoung-Seon, Han Sang-Sun, Jang Woowon, Choi Yoon Jeong
Private Practice, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Mar 25;51(2):126-134. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.126.
This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis: there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns.
This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups: condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles.
The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group ( < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups ( < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups ( < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group ( < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height.
TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
本研究旨在评估以下零假设:颞下颌关节(TMJ)结构形态在垂直和矢状向头影测量模式方面不存在差异。
本回顾性研究纳入了131名无TMJ症状的参与者。参与者根据矢状向头影测量关系分为I类、II类和III类组,并根据垂直向头影测量关系分为高角、均角和低角组。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描图像进行以下测量,并在组间进行比较:髁突体积、髁突大小(宽度、长度和高度)、关节窝大小(长度和高度)以及髁突前极、上极和后极处的髁突 - 关节窝间隙。
零假设被拒绝。III类组的髁突宽度、髁突高度和关节窝高度值大于II类组(<0.05)。高角组的髁突体积和上关节间隙明显小于其他两个垂直组(<0.001),而高角组的关节窝长度和高度明显大于其他组(<0.01)。低角组的髁突宽度大于高角组(<0.01)。矢状向和垂直向头影测量模式在关节窝长度和高度方面显示出具有统计学意义的交互作用。
TMJ形态在不同的骨骼头影测量模式中存在差异。关节窝长度和高度受垂直和矢状骨骼模式相互作用的影响。