Warschawski Yaniv, Rutenberg Tal Frenkel, Factor Shai, Tudor Adirian, Sharfman Zachary, Morgan Samuel, Lichtenstein Adi, Snir Nimrod
Orthopedic Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Ichilov Hospital, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Orthopedic Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Orthop. 2021 Feb 12;24:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
There is no consensus regarding the optimal device for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. This retrospective study compared two techniques (1) cannulated cancellous screw (CCS), and (2) Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) plate.
Data regarding gender, operational data, complications, pain, Quality of life and function scores were retrieved.
103 patients were included, 42 were treated using CCS, compared to 61 treated using TFN. Operative time shorter for CCS (p = 0.019). Complication rates were not different (p > 0.05).
As CCS method take shorter operating time and reduced costs, CCS should be used for the treatment of displaced ICHF.
对于移位性囊内髋关节骨折的最佳治疗器械尚无共识。本回顾性研究比较了两种技术:(1)空心松质骨螺钉(CCS),和(2)Targon股骨颈(TFN)钢板。
收集有关性别、手术数据、并发症、疼痛、生活质量和功能评分的数据。
纳入103例患者,42例采用CCS治疗,61例采用TFN治疗。CCS的手术时间较短(p = 0.019)。并发症发生率无差异(p > 0.05)。
由于CCS方法手术时间短且成本降低,因此CCS应用于移位性囊内髋关节骨折的治疗。