Suppr超能文献

动力锁定钢板与空心松质骨螺钉治疗移位型髋关节囊内骨折的对比研究

Dynamic locking plate vs. cannulated cancellous screw for displaced intracapsular hip fracture: A comparative study.

作者信息

Warschawski Yaniv, Rutenberg Tal Frenkel, Factor Shai, Tudor Adirian, Sharfman Zachary, Morgan Samuel, Lichtenstein Adi, Snir Nimrod

机构信息

Orthopedic Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Ichilov Hospital, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Orthopedic Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2021 Feb 12;24:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus regarding the optimal device for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. This retrospective study compared two techniques (1) cannulated cancellous screw (CCS), and (2) Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) plate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data regarding gender, operational data, complications, pain, Quality of life and function scores were retrieved.

RESULTS

103 patients were included, 42 were treated using CCS, compared to 61 treated using TFN. Operative time shorter for CCS (p = 0.019). Complication rates were not different (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

As CCS method take shorter operating time and reduced costs, CCS should be used for the treatment of displaced ICHF.

摘要

引言

对于移位性囊内髋关节骨折的最佳治疗器械尚无共识。本回顾性研究比较了两种技术:(1)空心松质骨螺钉(CCS),和(2)Targon股骨颈(TFN)钢板。

材料与方法

收集有关性别、手术数据、并发症、疼痛、生活质量和功能评分的数据。

结果

纳入103例患者,42例采用CCS治疗,61例采用TFN治疗。CCS的手术时间较短(p = 0.019)。并发症发生率无差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

由于CCS方法手术时间短且成本降低,因此CCS应用于移位性囊内髋关节骨折的治疗。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验