• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dynamic locking plate vs. cannulated cancellous screw for displaced intracapsular hip fracture: A comparative study.动力锁定钢板与空心松质骨螺钉治疗移位型髋关节囊内骨折的对比研究
J Orthop. 2021 Feb 12;24:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
2
Dynamic locking plate vs. simple cannulated screws for nondisplaced intracapsular hip fracture: A comparative study.动力锁定钢板与简单空心螺钉治疗无移位囊内髋部骨折的比较研究
Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):424-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.054. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
3
The outcome of intracapsular hip fracture fixation using the Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) locking plate system or cannulated cancellous screws: A comparative study involving 2004 patients.使用Targon股骨颈（TFN）锁定钢板系统或空心松质骨螺钉进行囊内髋部骨折固定的疗效：一项涉及2004例患者的比较研究。
Injury. 2017 Nov;48(11):2555-2562. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.063. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Is dynamic locking plate(Targon FN) a better choice for treating of intracapsular hip fracture? A meta-analysis.动力锁定接骨板（Targon FN）治疗囊内型髋部骨折是否更优？一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.044. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Comparison of early complications between the use of a cannulated screw locking plate and multiple cancellous screws in the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in young adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial.空心螺钉锁定钢板与多枚松质骨螺钉治疗青年成人移位型囊内髋部骨折的早期并发症比较：一项随机对照临床试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Aug 13;13(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0901-3.
6
Dynamic Locking Plate versus Multiple Cancellous Screws for the Fixation of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures: Long-Term Results and Quality-Of-Life Assessment Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.动力锁定钢板与多枚松质骨螺钉固定囊内股骨颈骨折的比较：基于患者报告结局指标的长期结果及生活质量评估
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 16;13(4):1123. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041123.
7
Is dynamic locking plate superior than other implants for intracapsular hip fracture: A meta-analysis.动力锁定钢板在治疗髋关节囊内骨折方面是否优于其他植入物：一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(47):e13001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013001.
8
A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw Versus Multiple Cannulated Compression Screw Fixation in Undisplaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures.动力髋螺钉与多枚空心加压螺钉固定治疗无移位股骨颈囊内骨折的比较研究
Cureus. 2022 Nov 17;14(11):e31619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31619. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Outcomes of internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures using dynamic locking plate system (Targon FN).使用动力锁定钢板系统（Targon FN）治疗髋关节囊内骨折的内固定效果。
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):829-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.019. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
the Targon femoral neck hip screw versus cannulated screws for internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the hip: a randomised controlled trial.经颈股骨 Targon 钉与空心钉治疗髋关节囊内骨折的内固定：一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2014 May;96-B(5):652-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.33391.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of cancellous screws in a sliding compression configuration and angle-stable sliding compression implants for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in the non-elderly predominantly below 65 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非老年（主要为65岁以下）股骨颈骨折内固定中滑动加压型松质骨螺钉与角度稳定型滑动加压植入物的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jun 16;96:443-451. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44034.
2
Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.带腓骨支撑植骨的动力髋螺钉（DHS）在治疗股骨颈粉碎性骨折（FNF）时是否更具优势？与新型股骨颈植入系统的对比分析。
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Apr 29;59(6):824-832. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Risk assessment of femoral head AVN following reduction and fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in patients younger than 65 years over a 10 year follow up.65岁以下患者囊内髋部骨折复位内固定术后10年随访期间股骨头缺血性坏死的风险评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 17;15(1):5691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89974-2.
4
Surgical treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.老年人股骨颈骨折的手术治疗选择。
Int Orthop. 2022 May;46(5):1111-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05314-3. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation--a prospective cohort study.英国髋部骨折人群健康相关生活质量的恢复。华威髋部创伤评估——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):372-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.35738.
2
The Targon FN system for the management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures: minimum 2-year experience and outcome in an independent hospital.用于治疗股骨颈囊内骨折的塔尔贡FN系统：一家独立医院的至少2年经验及结果
Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar;7(1):22-8. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.1.22. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
3
the Targon femoral neck hip screw versus cannulated screws for internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the hip: a randomised controlled trial.经颈股骨 Targon 钉与空心钉治疗髋关节囊内骨折的内固定：一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2014 May;96-B(5):652-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.33391.
4
Targon Femoral Neck for femoral-neck fracture fixation: lessons learnt from a series of one hundred and thirty five consecutive cases.用于股骨颈骨折固定的塔尔贡（Targon）：从连续135例病例中吸取的经验教训。
Int Orthop. 2014 Mar;38(3):595-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2176-y. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
5
Angular stable multiple screw fixation (Targon FN) versus standard SHS for the fixation of femoral neck fractures.用于股骨颈骨折固定的角稳定多螺钉固定（Targon FN）与标准动力髋螺钉（SHS）的比较
Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.026. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
6
Internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the hip using a dynamic locking plate: Two-year follow-up of 320 patients.动力锁定钢板内固定治疗髋关节囊内骨折：320 例患者 2 年随访结果
Bone Joint J. 2013 Oct;95-B(10):1402-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31511.
7
Biomechanical analysis of the sliding hip screw, cannulated screws and Targon1 FN in intracapsular hip fractures in cadaver femora.滑动髋螺钉、空心螺钉及Targon1 FN在尸体股骨囊内髋部骨折中的生物力学分析
Injury. 2011 Feb;42(2):183-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.021.
8
Undisplaced femoral neck fractures--no problems? A consecutive study of 224 patients treated with internal fixation.无移位股骨颈骨折——没问题？ 224 例内固定治疗的连续研究。
Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):274-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
9
Posterior multifragmentation of the femoral neck: does it portend a poor outcome in internally fixed intracapsular hip fractures?股骨颈后多骨折块：是否预示着囊内固定髋关节骨折的不良结局？
Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):280-2. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Nov 30.
10
Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.垂直型股骨颈骨折：四种固定技术的力学分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Sep;21(8):544-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31814b822e.

动力锁定钢板与空心松质骨螺钉治疗移位型髋关节囊内骨折的对比研究

Dynamic locking plate vs. cannulated cancellous screw for displaced intracapsular hip fracture: A comparative study.

作者信息

Warschawski Yaniv, Rutenberg Tal Frenkel, Factor Shai, Tudor Adirian, Sharfman Zachary, Morgan Samuel, Lichtenstein Adi, Snir Nimrod

机构信息

Orthopedic Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Ichilov Hospital, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Orthopedic Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2021 Feb 12;24:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.008
PMID:33679022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902286/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus regarding the optimal device for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. This retrospective study compared two techniques (1) cannulated cancellous screw (CCS), and (2) Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) plate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data regarding gender, operational data, complications, pain, Quality of life and function scores were retrieved.

RESULTS

103 patients were included, 42 were treated using CCS, compared to 61 treated using TFN. Operative time shorter for CCS (p = 0.019). Complication rates were not different (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

As CCS method take shorter operating time and reduced costs, CCS should be used for the treatment of displaced ICHF.

摘要

引言

对于移位性囊内髋关节骨折的最佳治疗器械尚无共识。本回顾性研究比较了两种技术：（1）空心松质骨螺钉（CCS），和（2）Targon股骨颈（TFN）钢板。

材料与方法

收集有关性别、手术数据、并发症、疼痛、生活质量和功能评分的数据。

结果

纳入103例患者，42例采用CCS治疗，61例采用TFN治疗。CCS的手术时间较短（p = 0.019）。并发症发生率无差异（p > 0.05）。

结论

由于CCS方法手术时间短且成本降低，因此CCS应用于移位性囊内髋关节骨折的治疗。