Victor Christina R
College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;11:612771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612771. eCollection 2020.
Loneliness has been reframed from a 'social problem of old age' into a major public health problem. This transformation has been generated by findings from observational studies of a relationship between loneliness and a range of negative health outcomes including dementia. From a public health perspective, key to evaluating the relationship between loneliness and dementia is examining how studies define and measure loneliness, the exposure variable, and dementia the outcome. If we are not consistently measuring these then building a body of evidence for the negative health outcomes of loneliness is problematic. Three key criteria had to meet for studies to be included in our analysis. To test the proposition that loneliness is a cause of dementia we only included longitudinal studies. For inclusion studies had to measure loneliness at baseline, have samples free of dementia and assess dementia at follow up (specified as a minimum of 12 months). We identified 11 papers published between 2000 and 2018 that meet these criteria. These studies included seven different countries and only one was specifically focused upon dementia: all other studies were cohort studies focused upon ageing and health and wellbeing. There was extensive heterogeneity in how studies measured loneliness and dementia and in the use of co-variates. Loneliness was measured by either self-rating scales ( = 8) or scales ( = 3). Dementia was assessed by clinical tests ( = 5), diagnostic/screening tools ( = 3), cognitive function tests ( = 1), and self-reported doctor diagnosis ( = 2). Substantial variation in loneliness prevalence (range 5-20%) and dementia incidence (5-30 per 1000 person years at risk). Six studies did not report a statistically significant relationship between loneliness and dementia. Significant excess risk of dementia among those who were lonely ranged from 15% to 64%. None of these studies are directly comparable as four different loneliness and dementia measures were used. We suggest that the evidence to support a relationship between loneliness and dementia is inconclusive largely because of methodological limitations of existing studies. If we wish to develop this evidence base, then using a consistent set of loneliness and dementia outcome measures in major longitudinal studies would be of benefit.
孤独已从“老年社会问题”重新界定为一个重大的公共卫生问题。这种转变源于观察性研究的结果,这些研究揭示了孤独与一系列负面健康结果(包括痴呆症)之间的关系。从公共卫生角度来看,评估孤独与痴呆症之间关系的关键在于审视研究如何定义和衡量孤独(暴露变量)以及痴呆症(结果变量)。如果我们对这些变量的测量不一致,那么为孤独的负面健康结果建立证据体系就会存在问题。要纳入我们的分析,研究必须满足三个关键标准。为了检验孤独是痴呆症病因这一命题,我们只纳入了纵向研究。纳入的研究必须在基线时测量孤独感,样本无痴呆症,并在随访时评估痴呆症(规定至少为12个月)。我们确定了2000年至2018年间发表的11篇符合这些标准的论文。这些研究涵盖七个不同国家,只有一项专门针对痴呆症:所有其他研究都是关注老龄化、健康和幸福的队列研究。在研究如何测量孤独感和痴呆症以及协变量的使用方面存在广泛的异质性。孤独感通过自评量表(=8)或量表(=3)来测量。痴呆症通过临床测试(=5)、诊断/筛查工具(=3)、认知功能测试(=1)和自我报告的医生诊断(=2)来评估。孤独感患病率(范围为5 - 20%)和痴呆症发病率(每1000人年风险中有5 - 30例)存在很大差异。六项研究未报告孤独感与痴呆症之间具有统计学意义的关系。孤独者患痴呆症的显著额外风险在15%至64%之间。由于使用了四种不同的孤独感和痴呆症测量方法,这些研究都无法直接进行比较。我们认为,支持孤独与痴呆症之间存在关联的证据尚无定论,这主要是由于现有研究的方法学局限性。如果我们希望拓展这一证据基础,那么在主要的纵向研究中使用一套一致的孤独感和痴呆症结果测量方法将是有益的。