Kaplan Elif Canseza, Wagner Anita E, Toffanin Paolo, Başkent Deniz
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:623787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623787. eCollection 2021.
Earlier studies have shown that musically trained individuals may have a benefit in adverse listening situations when compared to non-musicians, especially in speech-on-speech perception. However, the literature provides mostly conflicting results. In the current study, by employing different measures of spoken language processing, we aimed to test whether we could capture potential differences between musicians and non-musicians in speech-on-speech processing. We used an offline measure of speech perception (sentence recall task), which reveals a post-task response, and online measures of real time spoken language processing: gaze-tracking and pupillometry. We used stimuli of comparable complexity across both paradigms and tested the same groups of participants. In the sentence recall task, musicians recalled more words correctly than non-musicians. In the eye-tracking experiment, both groups showed reduced fixations to the target and competitor words' images as the level of speech maskers increased. The time course of gaze fixations to the competitor did not differ between groups in the speech-in-quiet condition, while the time course dynamics did differ between groups as the two-talker masker was added to the target signal. As the level of two-talker masker increased, musicians showed reduced lexical competition as indicated by the gaze fixations to the competitor. The pupil dilation data showed differences mainly in one target-to-masker ratio. This does not allow to draw conclusions regarding potential differences in the use of cognitive resources between groups. Overall, the eye-tracking measure enabled us to observe that musicians may be using a different strategy than non-musicians to attain spoken word recognition as the noise level increased. However, further investigation with more fine-grained alignment between the processes captured by online and offline measures is necessary to establish whether musicians differ due to better cognitive control or sound processing.
早期研究表明,与非音乐家相比,受过音乐训练的人在不利的听觉环境中可能具有优势,尤其是在语音对语音感知方面。然而,文献大多提供了相互矛盾的结果。在当前的研究中,通过采用不同的口语处理测量方法,我们旨在测试是否能够捕捉音乐家和非音乐家在语音对语音处理方面的潜在差异。我们使用了一种语音感知的离线测量方法(句子回忆任务),该方法揭示了任务后的反应,以及实时口语处理的在线测量方法:注视跟踪和瞳孔测量。我们在两种范式中使用了复杂度相当的刺激,并测试了相同的参与者群体。在句子回忆任务中,音乐家比非音乐家正确回忆出更多的单词。在眼动追踪实验中,随着语音掩蔽器水平的增加,两组对目标词和竞争词图像的注视次数都减少了。在安静语音条件下,两组对竞争词的注视时间进程没有差异,而当在目标信号中添加双说话者掩蔽器时,两组的时间进程动态有所不同。随着双说话者掩蔽器水平的增加,音乐家对竞争词的注视表明词汇竞争减少。瞳孔扩张数据主要在一个目标与掩蔽器比例上显示出差异。这无法就两组在认知资源使用方面的潜在差异得出结论。总体而言,眼动追踪测量使我们能够观察到,随着噪声水平的增加,音乐家在实现口语单词识别时可能使用了与非音乐家不同的策略。然而,需要进一步研究,使在线和离线测量所捕捉的过程之间有更精细的匹配,以确定音乐家是否因更好的认知控制或声音处理而存在差异。