Heitmann Janika, de Jong Peter J
Verslavingszorg Noord Nederland, Groningen, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 15;12:626326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626326. eCollection 2021.
Current cognitive models of addiction imply that speeded detection and increased distraction from substance cues might both independently contribute to the persistence of addictive behavior. Speeded detection might lower the threshold for experiencing craving, whereas increased distraction might further increase the probability of entering a bias-craving-bias cycle, thereby lowering the threshold for repeated substance use. This study was designed to examine whether indeed both attentional processes are involved in substance use disorders. Both attentional processes were indexed by an Odd-One-Out visual search task in individuals diagnosed with alcohol use disorder (AUD; = 63) and cannabis use disorder (CUD; = 28). To test whether the detection and/or the distraction component are characteristic for AUD and CUD, their indices were compared with matched individuals without these diagnoses (respectively, = 63 and = 28). Individuals with CUD showed speeded detection of cannabis cues; the difference in detection between AUD and the comparison group remained inconclusive. Neither the AUD nor the CUD group showed more distraction than the comparison groups. The sample size of the CUD group was relatively small. In addition, participants made relatively many errors in the attentional bias (AB) task, which might have lowered its sensitivity to detect ABs. The current study provided no support for the proposed role of increased distraction in CUD and AUD. The findings did, however, provide support for the view that speeded detection might be involved in CUD. Although a similar trend was evident for AUD, the evidence was weak and remained therefore inconclusive.
当前的成瘾认知模型表明,对物质线索的快速检测和注意力分散增加可能都独立地导致成瘾行为的持续存在。快速检测可能会降低渴望体验的阈值,而注意力分散增加可能会进一步增加进入偏差-渴望-偏差循环的可能性,从而降低重复使用物质的阈值。本研究旨在检验这两种注意力过程是否确实都与物质使用障碍有关。通过一项“找出不同项”视觉搜索任务,对诊断为酒精使用障碍(AUD;n = 63)和大麻使用障碍(CUD;n = 28)的个体的这两种注意力过程进行了评估。为了测试检测和/或注意力分散成分是否是AUD和CUD的特征,将他们的指标与未患这些疾病的匹配个体(分别为n = 63和n = 28)进行了比较。患有CUD的个体对大麻线索的检测速度加快;AUD与对照组之间的检测差异尚无定论。AUD组和CUD组的注意力分散均不比对照组多。CUD组的样本量相对较小。此外,参与者在注意力偏差(AB)任务中犯的错误相对较多,这可能降低了该任务检测AB的敏感性。本研究没有为注意力分散增加在CUD和AUD中所起的作用提供支持。然而,研究结果确实支持了快速检测可能与CUD有关的观点。虽然AUD也有类似趋势,但证据薄弱,因此尚无定论。