Suppr超能文献

帕金森病中使用H型线圈的双侧重复经颅磁刺激:一项随机、假对照研究。

Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With the H-Coil in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study.

作者信息

Spagnolo Francesca, Fichera Mario, Chieffo Raffaella, Dalla Costa Gloria, Pisa Marco, Volonté Maria Antonietta, Falautano Monica, Zangen Abraham, Comi Giancarlo, Leocani Letizia

机构信息

Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology - INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 18;11:584713. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.584713. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Pilot open-label application of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with H-coil in Parkinson's Disease (PD) have shown promising results. To evaluate safety and efficacy of high-frequency rTMS with H-coil in PD in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Sixty patients with PD were randomized into 3 groups: M1-PFC (real stimulation on primary motor-M1 and pre-frontal cortices-PFC), M1 (real rTMS on M1, sham on PFC), Sham (apparent stimulation). Primary outcome was baseline-normalized percent improvement in UPDRS part III OFF-therapy at the end of treatment (12 rTMS sessions, 4 weeks). Secondary outcomes were improvement in UPDRS part III sub-scores, timed tests, and neuropsychological tests. Statistical analysis compared improvement following real and sham stimulation at the end of the protocol using either a -test or a Mann-Whitney test. All patients tolerated the treatment and concluded the study. One patient from M1-PFC group was excluded from the analysis due to newly discovered uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. No serious adverse effect was recorded. At the end of treatment, patients receiving real rTMS (M1-PFC and M1 combined) showed significantly greater improvement compared to sham in UPDRS part III total score ( = 0.007), tremor subscore ( = 0.011), and lateralized sub-scores ( = 0.042 for the more affected side; = 0.012 for the less affected side). No significant differences have been oserved in safety and efficacy outcomes between the two real rTMS groups. Notably, mild, not-distressing and transient dyskinesias occurred in 3 patients after real rTMS in OFF state. The present findings suggest that high-frequency rTMS with H-coil is a safe and potentially effective procedure and prompt larger studies for validation as add-on treatment in PD.

摘要

使用H型线圈进行高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在帕金森病(PD)中的初步开放标签应用已显示出有前景的结果。在一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究中评估使用H型线圈进行高频rTMS治疗PD的安全性和有效性。60例PD患者被随机分为3组:M1-前额叶皮质组(对初级运动皮质-M1和前额叶皮质-PFC进行真实刺激)、M1组(对M1进行真实rTMS,对PFC进行假刺激)、假刺激组(模拟刺激)。主要结局是治疗结束时(12次rTMS治疗,4周)非治疗状态下统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第三部分相对于基线的改善百分比。次要结局是UPDRS第三部分各亚评分、计时测试和神经心理学测试的改善情况。统计分析使用t检验或曼-惠特尼检验比较方案结束时真实刺激和假刺激后的改善情况。所有患者均耐受治疗并完成研究。M1-前额叶皮质组的1例患者因新发现的未控制糖尿病被排除在分析之外。未记录到严重不良反应。治疗结束时,接受真实rTMS(M1-前额叶皮质组和Ml组合计)的患者在UPDRS第三部分总分(P = 0.007)、震颤亚评分(P = 0.011)和侧别亚评分(患侧较重者P = 0.042;患侧较轻者P = 0.012)方面与假刺激组相比改善显著更大。两个真实rTMS组在安全性和有效性结局方面未观察到显著差异。值得注意的是,3例患者在真实rTMS治疗后处于非治疗状态时出现了轻度、不令人困扰且短暂的运动障碍。目前的研究结果表明,使用H型线圈进行高频rTMS是一种安全且可能有效的治疗方法,并促使开展更大规模的研究以验证其作为PD附加治疗的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3fe/7930321/8994318f7ae1/fneur-11-584713-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验