Macchi Laura, Poli Francesco, Caravona Laura, Vezzoli Michela, Franchella Miriam A G, Bagassi Maria
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Sep 27;15(3):595-613. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1794. eCollection 2019 Sep.
The previous research attempts to reduce the influence of the belief bias on deductive thinking have often been unsuccessful and, when they succeeded, they failed to replicate. In this paper, we propose a new way to see an old problem. Instead of considering the analytical abilities of the respondent, we focus on the communicative characteristics of the experimental task. By changing the pragmatics into play through a subtle manipulation of the instruction of the syllogism problem, we obtained a strong improvement in the accuracy of the performance in both untrained and trained in logic respondents. We suggest that current models of deductive thinking should be broadened to consider also communicative understanding as part of the processing of the problem.
以往试图减少信念偏差对演绎思维影响的研究往往并不成功,即便成功了,其结果也无法复现。在本文中,我们提出了一种看待老问题的新方法。我们不再考虑被试的分析能力,而是专注于实验任务的交流特征。通过对三段论问题的指导语进行巧妙操控,使语用发挥作用,我们发现,无论是未经逻辑训练的被试还是接受过逻辑训练的被试,其作答准确性都有了显著提高。我们建议,当前的演绎思维模型应加以扩展,将交流理解也纳入问题处理过程之中。