Favaro Jaqueline Costa, de Mello Peixoto Yana Cosendey Toledo, Geha Omar, Dias Flaviana Alves, Guiraldo Ricardo Danil, Lopes Murilo Baena, Berger Sandrine Bittencourt
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Parana, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jan 12;46(1):e7. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e7. eCollection 2021 Feb.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of different anticaries agents, such as experimental agents based on silver nanoparticles (SNPs) and silver diamine fluoride (SDF), on the micro-shear bond strength (μ-SBS) of composite resin applied to intact enamel (IE) or demineralized enamel (DE).
Sixty dental enamel fragments were collected from human third molars and categorized into 6 groups ( = 10): positive control (IE), negative control (DE), IE + SDF, DE + SDF, IE + SNP and DE + SNP. Samples from DE, DE + SDF and DE + SNP groups were subjected to pH cycling; superficial microhardness test was performed to confirm demineralization. Resin composite build-ups were applied to the samples (0.75-mm diameter and 1-mm height) after the treatments (except for IE and DE groups); μ-SBS was also evaluated. Samples were analyzed under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification to identify failure patterns. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's and Dunnett's tests ( < 0.05).
There was no significant difference among the IE, IE + SNP, DE + SDF, and DE + SNP groups. The IE + SDF and DE groups recorded the highest and the lowest μ-SBS values, respectively. Adhesive-type failures were the most frequent for all treatments.
Anticaries agents did not have a negative effect on the μ-SBS of composite resin when it was used on IE or DE.
本研究旨在调查不同防龋剂,如基于银纳米颗粒(SNPs)和氟化亚锡(SDF)的实验性制剂,对应用于完整釉质(IE)或脱矿釉质(DE)的复合树脂微剪切粘结强度(μ-SBS)的影响。
从人类第三磨牙收集60个牙釉质碎片,分为6组(每组n = 10):阳性对照组(IE)、阴性对照组(DE)、IE + SDF组、DE + SDF组、IE + SNP组和DE + SNP组。对DE、DE + SDF和DE + SNP组的样本进行pH循环处理;进行表面显微硬度测试以确认脱矿情况。处理后(IE和DE组除外),将树脂复合材料堆积在样本上(直径0.75 mm,高度1 mm);还评估了μ-SBS。在40倍放大倍数的立体显微镜下分析样本以确定失败模式。数据进行单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验和Dunnett检验(P < 0.05)。
IE组、IE + SNP组、DE + SDF组和DE + SNP组之间无显著差异。IE + SDF组和DE组分别记录了最高和最低的μ-SBS值。所有处理中,粘结型失败最为常见。
当防龋剂应用于IE或DE时,对复合树脂的μ-SBS没有负面影响。