Elshenawy Enas A, Alawy Safa B, Alghonemy Wafaa Yahia, El Dosoky Ahmed Ibrahime
Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, 31773, Tanta, Egypt.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, 31773, Tanta, Egypt.
BDJ Open. 2025 May 5;11(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00332-w.
to compare the effect of using a pre-reacted glass-ionomer (PRG) barrier coat versus silver diamine fluoride (SDF) varnish treatment before orthodontic bracket bonding to prevent white spot lesions (WSL). The effect of these materials on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets was evaluated through an in vitro study.
One hundred-five premolars were used; forty-two specimens were designated for comparing SDF versus PRG-barrier coat using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with elemental analysis and microhardness testing (n = 21/group). Tested materials were applied in a split-tooth design protocol (side A: control, side B: treated). Measurement was made at baseline and after bracket placement and exposure to the pH cycle. A polarized light microscope (PLM) was used for qualitative examination. Sixty-three specimens were intended for shear bond strength (SBS) testing after the pH cycle as follows: control group (no treatment), SDF group, and PRG-barrier coat group (n = 21/group). Statistical analysis was done using Paired T-test.
SEM for specimens treated by SDF or PRG revealed enamel remineralization with calcium deposits and small porosities between the crystallites. All groups had a significant difference regarding the Ca/P ratio and microhardness. Baseline hardness for both groups was significantly higher than the treated sides, which was significantly higher than the non-treated sides (P = 0.000*) and (P = 0.000*) in accordance with the Paired T-test. In comparing SDF with PRG-coat groups, the T-test showed non-significant differences in mean differences between treated and baseline hardness values (T = 0.32, P = 0.74). PLM for treated specimens by SDF or PRG depicted an evident remineralized surface enamel layer. SBS values did not differ significantly between groups.
As confirmed by SEM and PLM, applying either SDF varnish or PRG-barrier coat before bonding orthodontic brackets could effectively prevent the development of WSL and achieve surface enamel protection. In addition, the two applied varnishes showed slightly higher shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets compared to the control group, with the SDF slightly higher than PRG. Also, clinical translation is needed in future research to evaluate the study.
比较在正畸托槽粘结前使用预反应玻璃离子(PRG)屏障涂层与氟化银胺(SDF)清漆治疗预防白斑病变(WSL)的效果。通过一项体外研究评估这些材料对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
使用105颗前磨牙;42个样本用于通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)结合元素分析和显微硬度测试比较SDF与PRG屏障涂层(n = 21/组)。测试材料采用分牙设计方案应用(A侧:对照,B侧:处理)。在基线以及托槽放置和暴露于pH循环后进行测量。使用偏光显微镜(PLM)进行定性检查。63个样本用于在pH循环后进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试,如下:对照组(未处理)、SDF组和PRG屏障涂层组(n = 21/组)。使用配对T检验进行统计分析。
对经SDF或PRG处理的样本进行SEM显示,牙釉质再矿化,有钙沉积且微晶之间存在小孔隙。所有组在钙磷比和显微硬度方面均有显著差异。根据配对T检验,两组的基线硬度均显著高于处理侧,处理侧又显著高于未处理侧(P = 0.000*)和(P = 0.000*)。在比较SDF组与PRG涂层组时,T检验显示处理后与基线硬度值之间的平均差异无显著差异(T = 0.32,P = 0.74)。对经SDF或PRG处理的样本进行PLM显示有明显的再矿化表面牙釉质层。各组之间的SBS值无显著差异。
如SEM和PLM所证实,在粘结正畸托槽前应用SDF清漆或PRG屏障涂层可有效预防WSL的发生并实现表面牙釉质保护。此外,与对照组相比,两种应用的清漆显示正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度略高,SDF略高于PRG。而且,未来研究需要进行临床转化以评估该研究。