Suppr超能文献

D-二聚体和纤维蛋白原在人工关节置换术后感染诊断中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Role of D-dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):692-700. doi: 10.1111/os.12969. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

Abstract

The diagnostic potential of D-dimer and fibrinogen to detect periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee is not well-understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether D-Dimer and fibrinogen can be used as effective biomarkers to screen PJI. A systematic review of the literature indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was performed. All studies using D-dimer levels in serum or plasma, or fibrinogen levels in plasma, for the diagnosis of PJI were included. Meta-analysis estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), were calculated using a random-effects model, and used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers. A total of nine studies were analyzed, and their quality was considered to be acceptable. D-dimer gave a limited diagnostic value if serum and plasma combined: sensitivity (0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63 to 0.87]), specificity (0.67, 95% CI [0.54 to 0.78]), DOR (6.81, 95% CI [2.67 to 17.37]), and AUSROC (0.78, 95% CI [0.74 to 0.82]). Plasma D-dimer levels were associated with less satisfactory sensitivity (0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.71), specificity (0.58, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.66), DOR (2.52, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.90), and AUSROC (0.65, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.69). Serum D-dimer levels showed higher corresponding values of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94), 0.76 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), 24.24 (95% CI 10.07 to 58.32), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93). Plasma fibrinogen showed acceptable corresponding values of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85), 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.85), 10.14 (95% CI 6.16 to 16.70), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86). Serum D-dimer may be an effective marker for the diagnosis of PJI in hip and knee arthroplasty patients, and it may show higher diagnostic potential than plasma fibrinogen. Plasma D-dimer may have limited diagnostic potential.

摘要

D-二聚体和纤维蛋白原诊断髋关节和膝关节假体周围关节感染(PJI)的潜力尚未被充分了解。本研究旨在确定 D-二聚体和纤维蛋白原是否可作为有效的生物标志物来筛查 PJI。我们对 Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase 和 Google Scholar 数据库中索引的文献进行了系统回顾。纳入了所有使用血清或血浆中的 D-二聚体水平或血浆中的纤维蛋白原水平来诊断 PJI 的研究。使用随机效应模型计算了包括敏感度、特异度、诊断比值比(DOR)和汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUSROC)在内的荟萃分析估计值,并用于评估这些生物标志物的诊断准确性。共分析了 9 项研究,其质量被认为是可以接受的。如果将血清和血浆结合使用,D-二聚体的诊断价值有限:敏感度(0.77,95%置信区间[CI] [0.63 至 0.87])、特异度(0.67,95%CI [0.54 至 0.78])、DOR(6.81,95%CI [2.67 至 17.37])和 AUSROC(0.78,95%CI [0.74 至 0.82])。血浆 D-二聚体水平与较低的敏感度(0.65,95%CI 0.57 至 0.71)、特异度(0.58,95%CI 0.50 至 0.66)、DOR(2.52,95%CI 1.64 至 3.90)和 AUSROC(0.65,95%CI 0.61 至 0.69)相关。血清 D-二聚体水平的相应值更高,分别为 0.89(95%CI 0.79 至 0.94)、0.76(95%CI 0.55 至 0.89)、24.24(95%CI 10.07 至 58.32)和 0.91(95%CI 0.88 至 0.93)。血浆纤维蛋白原的相应值为 0.79(95%CI 0.70 至 0.85)、0.73(95%CI 0.57 至 0.85)、10.14(95%CI 6.16 至 16.70)和 0.83(95%CI 0.79 至 0.86)。血清 D-二聚体可能是髋关节和膝关节置换术患者 PJI 的有效诊断标志物,其诊断潜力可能高于血浆纤维蛋白原。血浆 D-二聚体可能具有有限的诊断潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e424/8126916/58859bf6d39c/OS-13-692-g002.jpg

相似文献

3
Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 17;15(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01853-w.
5
[Diagnostic value of D-dimer for chronic periprosthetic infection after hip and knee joint replacement].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 1;58(6):464-468. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191106-00550.
6
The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 16;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y.
7
Circulating D-Dimer versus Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-Analysis.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;22(2):200-210. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.298. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Meta-analysis of serum and/or plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01808-1.
9
D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jul 16;15(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01761-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 18;145(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05627-5.
2
An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jun 30;16:120308. doi: 10.52965/001c.120308. eCollection 2024.
4
Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Utility of Biomarkers in 2023.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;12(6):1054. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061054.
5
Utility of D-dimer in total joint arthroplasty.
World J Orthop. 2023 Mar 18;14(3):90-102. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i3.90.
6
Role of Biomarkers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;12(12):2958. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122958.
8
Limited value of coagulation parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection.
Int Orthop. 2022 Oct;46(10):2189-2194. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05495-x. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
Diagnostic value of platelet indices in infected nonunion: a retrospective study.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 4;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03096-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Oct;29(10):3287-3298. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06154-7. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
[Diagnostic accuracy of artery peak velocity variation measured by bedside real-time ultrasound for prediction of fluid responsiveness: a Meta-analysis].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191226-00018.
3
The Predictive Value of d-Dimer Test for Venous Thromboembolism During Puerperium: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029620901786. doi: 10.1177/1076029620901786.
4
The Utility of Serum d-Dimer for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1692-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.034. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Screening for Periprosthetic Joint Infections With ESR and CRP: The Ideal Cutoffs.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1351-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.040. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Combined Measurement of D-Dimer and C-Reactive Protein Levels: Highly Accurate for Diagnosing Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jan;35(1):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Comparison of D-dimer with CRP and ESR for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jul 29;14(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1282-y.
10
Plasma Fibrin Degradation Product and D-Dimer Are of Limited Value for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2454-2460. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验