• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用个人紧急响应系统对德国患者30天内紧急医院转运进行预测建模:回顾性研究及与美国的比较

Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of German Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response: Retrospective Study and Comparison with the United States.

作者信息

Op den Buijs Jorn, Pijl Marten, Landgraf Andreas

机构信息

Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Philips DACH, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 8;9(3):e25121. doi: 10.2196/25121.

DOI:10.2196/25121
PMID:33682679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7985802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Predictive analytics based on data from remote monitoring of elderly via a personal emergency response system (PERS) in the United States can identify subscribers at high risk for emergency hospital transport. These risk predictions can subsequently be used to proactively target interventions and prevent avoidable, costly health care use. It is, however, unknown if PERS-based risk prediction with targeted interventions could also be applied in the German health care setting.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives were to develop and validate a predictive model of 30-day emergency hospital transport based on data from a German PERS provider and compare the model with our previously published predictive model developed on data from a US PERS provider.

METHODS

Retrospective data of 5805 subscribers to a German PERS service were used to develop and validate an extreme gradient boosting predictive model of 30-day hospital transport, including predictors derived from subscriber demographics, self-reported medical conditions, and a 2-year history of case data. Models were trained on 80% (4644/5805) of the data, and performance was evaluated on an independent test set of 20% (1161/5805). Results were compared with our previously published prediction model developed on a data set of PERS users in the United States.

RESULTS

German PERS subscribers were on average aged 83.6 years, with 64.0% (743/1161) females, with 65.4% (759/1161) reported 3 or more chronic conditions. A total of 1.4% (350/24,847) of subscribers had one or more emergency transports in 30 days in the test set, which was significantly lower compared with the US data set (2455/109,966, 2.2%). Performance of the predictive model of emergency hospital transport, as evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), was 0.749 (95% CI 0.721-0.777), which was similar to the US prediction model (AUC=0.778 [95% CI 0.769-0.788]). The top 1% (12/1161) of predicted high-risk patients were 10.7 times more likely to experience an emergency hospital transport in 30 days than the overall German PERS population. This lift was comparable to a model lift of 11.9 obtained by the US predictive model.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in emergency care use, PERS-based collected subscriber data can be used to predict use outcomes in different international settings. These predictive analytic tools can be used by health care organizations to extend population health management into the home by identifying and delivering timelier targeted interventions to high-risk patients. This could lead to overall improved patient experience, higher quality of care, and more efficient resource use.

摘要

背景

基于美国通过个人应急响应系统(PERS)对老年人进行远程监测的数据进行的预测分析,可以识别出有紧急住院运输高风险的用户。这些风险预测随后可用于主动进行干预,并防止不必要的、昂贵的医疗保健使用。然而,基于PERS的风险预测与针对性干预措施是否也能应用于德国的医疗保健环境尚不清楚。

目的

目标是基于德国PERS供应商的数据开发并验证一个30天紧急住院运输的预测模型,并将该模型与我们之前基于美国PERS供应商的数据开发并发表的预测模型进行比较。

方法

使用德国PERS服务的5805名用户的回顾性数据来开发并验证一个30天住院运输的极端梯度提升预测模型,包括从用户人口统计学、自我报告的医疗状况以及2年病例数据历史中得出的预测因素。模型在80%(4644/5805)的数据上进行训练,并在20%(1161/5805)的独立测试集上评估性能。将结果与我们之前基于美国PERS用户数据集开发并发表的预测模型进行比较。

结果

德国PERS用户的平均年龄为83.6岁,女性占64.0%(743/1161),65.4%(759/1161)的用户报告有3种或更多慢性病。在测试集中,共有1.4%(350/24847)的用户在30天内有一次或多次紧急运输,这与美国数据集(2455/109966,2.2%)相比显著更低。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估的紧急住院运输预测模型的性能为0.749(95%CI 0.721 - 0.777),这与美国预测模型(AUC = 0.778 [95%CI 0.769 - 0.788])相似。预测的高风险患者中前1%(12/1161)在30天内经历紧急住院运输的可能性是德国PERS总体人群的10.7倍。这种提升与美国预测模型获得的11.9的模型提升相当。

结论

尽管在紧急护理使用方面存在差异,但基于PERS收集的用户数据可用于预测不同国际环境下的使用结果。这些预测分析工具可被医疗保健组织用于通过识别并向高风险患者提供更及时的针对性干预措施,将人群健康管理扩展到家庭。这可能会带来整体改善的患者体验、更高的护理质量以及更有效的资源利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/b390f7785528/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/052bf0b296e3/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/6c0b9b06e7e1/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/1071fd17d45a/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/43fc104dd36e/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/b390f7785528/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/052bf0b296e3/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/6c0b9b06e7e1/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/1071fd17d45a/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/43fc104dd36e/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e58/7985802/b390f7785528/medinform_v9i3e25121_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of German Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response: Retrospective Study and Comparison with the United States.使用个人紧急响应系统对德国患者30天内紧急医院转运进行预测建模:回顾性研究及与美国的比较
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 8;9(3):e25121. doi: 10.2196/25121.
2
Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response System: Prognostic Retrospective Study.使用个人应急响应系统对患者30天内急诊医院转运进行预测建模:预后回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Nov 27;6(4):e49. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9907.
3
Evaluating the Impact of a Risk Assessment System With Tailored Interventions in Germany: Protocol for a Prospective Study With Matched Controls.评估德国一个采用定制干预措施的风险评估系统的影响:一项匹配对照前瞻性研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 1;9(10):e17584. doi: 10.2196/17584.
4
Healthcare utilization in older patients using personal emergency response systems: an analysis of electronic health records and medical alert data : Brief Description: A Longitudinal Retrospective Analyses of healthcare utilization rates in older patients using Personal Emergency Response Systems from 2011 to 2015.使用个人紧急响应系统的老年患者的医疗保健利用情况:电子健康记录和医疗警报数据的分析:简要描述:对2011年至2015年使用个人紧急响应系统的老年患者医疗保健利用率进行的纵向回顾性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2196-1.
5
Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems.个人应急响应系统的满意度及使用情况
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Aug;43(4):219-23. doi: 10.1007/s00391-010-0127-4.
6
Profile differences of purchasers, non-purchasers, and users and non-users of Personal Emergency Response Systems: Results of a prospective cohort study.个人紧急响应系统购买者、非购买者、使用者和非使用者的特征差异:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Oct;10(4):607-610. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
7
8
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
9
10
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Algoplaque Hydrocolloid Dressing Combined with Nanosilver Antibacterial Gel under Predictive Nursing in the Treatment of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury.预测性护理下 Algoplaque 水胶体敷料联合纳米银抗菌凝胶治疗医疗器械相关性压力损伤的效果。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 11;2022:9756602. doi: 10.1155/2022/9756602. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive analytics and tailored interventions improve clinical outcomes in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.预测性分析与个性化干预可改善老年人的临床结局:一项随机对照试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jun 10;4(1):97. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00463-y.
2
Evaluating the Impact of a Risk Assessment System With Tailored Interventions in Germany: Protocol for a Prospective Study With Matched Controls.评估德国一个采用定制干预措施的风险评估系统的影响:一项匹配对照前瞻性研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 1;9(10):e17584. doi: 10.2196/17584.
3
Potentially avoidable hospitalisations of German nursing home patients? A cross-sectional study on utilisation patterns and potential consequences for healthcare.
德国养老院患者的潜在可避免住院治疗?利用模式及其对医疗保健的潜在影响的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e025269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025269.
4
Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response System: Prognostic Retrospective Study.使用个人应急响应系统对患者30天内急诊医院转运进行预测建模:预后回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Nov 27;6(4):e49. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9907.
5
Evaluating the Impact of a Web-Based Risk Assessment System (CareSage) and Tailored Interventions on Health Care Utilization: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.评估基于网络的风险评估系统(CareSage)及定制干预措施对医疗保健利用的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 9;7(5):e10045. doi: 10.2196/10045.
6
[Acute and emergency care of geriatric patients : Old ways - new paths].[老年患者的急性和急诊护理:旧方法 - 新路径]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Dec;50(8):669-671. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1305-4. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Motives for self-referral to the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature.自我前往急诊科就诊的动机:文献系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1935-z.
8
Patient motives behind low-acuity visits to the emergency department in Germany: a qualitative study comparing urban and rural sites.德国低急症患者前往急诊科就诊的动机:一项比较城市和农村地区的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 16;6(11):e013323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013323.
9
Predicting Emergency Department Visits.预测急诊科就诊情况。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2016 Jul 20;2016:438-45. eCollection 2016.
10
The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services: An Integrative Review.个人应急响应系统作为初级卫生保健服务中的一项技术创新:一项综合综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 14;18(7):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5727.